Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, and School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Magn Reson Med. 2011 Aug;66(2):564-73. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22812. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
The aim of this study was to design a computer algorithm to assess the extent of cardiac edema from triple inversion recovery MR images of the human left ventricular myocardium. Twenty-one patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction were scanned within 48 h of the onset of symptoms. Eight patients were scanned a second time, 4 weeks after the initial event. Myocardial edema was detected in 27 of 29 studies using visual contour-based manual segmentation. A reference standard, created from the segmentations of three raters by voxel-wise majority voting, was compared to the edema mass estimates obtained using a newly developed computer algorithm. At baseline (n=20), the reference standard yielded an edema mass of 16.4±15.0 g (mean±SD) and the computer algorithm edema mass was 16.4±12.6 g. At follow-up (n=7), the reference standard edema mass was 7.1±4.4 g compared to 16.3±7.7 g at baseline. Computer algorithm estimates showed the same pattern of change with 5.7±5.7 g at follow-up compared to 20.8±13.8 g at baseline. Although there was a significant degree of discrepancy between reference standard and computer algorithm estimates of edema mass in individual patients, their overall agreement was good, with intraclass correlation coefficient ICC(3, 1)=0.753.
本研究旨在设计一种计算机算法,以评估人类左心室心肌三重反转恢复磁共振图像中心脏水肿的程度。21 名急性心肌梗死患者在症状发作后 48 小时内接受扫描。8 名患者在初次发病后 4 周再次接受扫描。使用基于视觉轮廓的手动分割,在 29 项研究中的 27 项中检测到心肌水肿。将由三位评分者的分割通过体素投票创建的参考标准与使用新开发的计算机算法获得的水肿质量估计进行比较。在基线(n=20)时,参考标准得出的水肿质量为 16.4±15.0 g(平均值±标准差),而计算机算法的水肿质量为 16.4±12.6 g。在随访时(n=7),参考标准的水肿质量为 7.1±4.4 g,而基线时为 16.3±7.7 g。计算机算法的估计值显示出相同的变化模式,随访时为 5.7±5.7 g,而基线时为 20.8±13.8 g。尽管在个别患者中,参考标准和计算机算法对水肿质量的估计值存在显著差异,但它们的总体一致性良好,组内相关系数 ICC(3,1)=0.753。