• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似的因素可以预测挥鞭样损伤后残疾和创伤后应激障碍轨迹。

Similar factors predict disability and posttraumatic stress disorder trajectories after whiplash injury.

机构信息

Centre for National Research on Disability and Rehabilitation Medicine (CONROD), University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Pain. 2011 Jun;152(6):1272-1278. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.01.056. Epub 2011 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.pain.2011.01.056
PMID:21396780
Abstract

Distinct developmental trajectories for neck disability and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms after whiplash injury have recently been identified. This study aimed to identify baseline predictors of membership to these trajectories and to explore their dual development. In a prospective study, 155 individuals with whiplash were assessed at <1 month, 3, 6, and 12 months postinjury. Outcomes at each time point were assessed according to the Neck Disability Index and the Posttraumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale. Baseline predictor variables were age, gender, initial pain (based on a visual analogue scale [VAS]), pressure pain thresholds (PPT), cold pain thresholds (CPT), and sympathetic vasoconstrictor responses. Group-based trajectory analytical techniques were used to parameterise the optimal trajectories and to identify baseline predictors. A dual trajectory analysis was used to explore probabilities of conditional and joint trajectory group membership. CPT > or = 13° C (OR = 26.320, 95% CI = 4.981-139.09), initial pain level (VAS) (OR = 4.3, 95% CI = 4.98-139.1), and age (OR = 1.109, 95% CI = 1.043-1.180) predicted a chronic/severe disability trajectory. The same baseline factors also predicted chronic moderate/severe PTSD (CPT > or = 13° C, OR = 9.7, 95% CI = 2.22-42.44; initial pain level [VAS]: OR = 2.13, 95% CI = 1.43-3.17; age: OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.01-1.14). There was good correspondence of trajectory group for both disability and PTSD. These findings support the proposal of links between the development of chronic neck related disability and PTSD after whiplash injury. Developmental trajectories of disability and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after whiplash injury are mostly in synchrony, and similar factors predict their membership. This suggests links between the development of chronic neck pain-related disability and PTSD.

摘要

颈痛障碍和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状在挥鞭伤后的发展轨迹最近已被确定。本研究旨在识别这些轨迹的基线预测因素,并探讨其双重发展。在一项前瞻性研究中,对 155 名挥鞭伤患者在受伤后<1 个月、3、6 和 12 个月进行评估。根据颈痛障碍指数和创伤后应激障碍诊断量表评估每个时间点的结局。基线预测变量包括年龄、性别、初始疼痛(基于视觉模拟量表[VAS])、压力疼痛阈值(PPT)、冷痛阈值(CPT)和交感神经血管收缩反应。使用基于群组的轨迹分析技术来参数化最佳轨迹并识别基线预测因素。使用双轨迹分析来探讨条件和联合轨迹组成员资格的概率。CPT≥13°C(OR=26.320,95%CI=4.981-139.09)、初始疼痛水平(VAS)(OR=4.3,95%CI=4.98-139.1)和年龄(OR=1.109,95%CI=1.043-1.180)预测慢性/严重残疾轨迹。同样的基线因素也预测慢性中度/重度 PTSD(CPT≥13°C,OR=9.7,95%CI=2.22-42.44;初始疼痛水平[VAS]:OR=2.13,95%CI=1.43-3.17;年龄:OR=1.07,95%CI=1.01-1.14)。残疾和 PTSD 的轨迹组之间有很好的对应关系。这些发现支持了挥鞭伤后慢性颈部相关残疾和 PTSD 发展之间存在联系的观点。挥鞭伤后残疾和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的发展轨迹大多同步,相似的因素预测其归属。这表明慢性颈部疼痛相关残疾和 PTSD 的发展之间存在联系。

相似文献

1
Similar factors predict disability and posttraumatic stress disorder trajectories after whiplash injury.相似的因素可以预测挥鞭样损伤后残疾和创伤后应激障碍轨迹。
Pain. 2011 Jun;152(6):1272-1278. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.01.056. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
2
Trajectories of posttraumatic stress symptoms after whiplash: A prospective cohort study.创伤后应激症状的轨迹:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Eur J Pain. 2019 Mar;23(3):515-525. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1325. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
3
Compensation claim lodgement and health outcome developmental trajectories following whiplash injury: A prospective study.挥鞭样损伤后赔偿申请提出和健康结果发展轨迹:一项前瞻性研究。
Pain. 2010 Jul;150(1):22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.02.013. Epub 2010 Mar 21.
4
Course of recovery for whiplash associated disorders in a compensation setting.赔偿环境下挥鞭样损伤相关疾病的恢复过程。
Injury. 2015 Nov;46(11):2118-29. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.08.038. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
5
Derivation of a clinical prediction rule to identify both chronic moderate/severe disability and full recovery following whiplash injury.制定一种临床预测规则,以识别挥鞭样损伤后慢性中重度残疾和完全康复。
Pain. 2013 Oct;154(10):2198-2206. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
6
Differential development of sensory hypersensitivity and a measure of spinal cord hyperexcitability following whiplash injury.颈鞭损伤后感觉过敏和脊髓兴奋性增高的差异发展。
Pain. 2010 Sep;150(3):501-506. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.06.003. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
7
Addition of posttraumatic stress and sensory hypersensitivity more accurately estimates disability and pain than fear avoidance measures alone after whiplash injury.与仅采用恐惧回避测量方法相比,将创伤后应激和感觉超敏反应纳入考量能更准确地评估挥鞭伤后的残疾程度和疼痛情况。
Pain. 2016 Aug;157(8):1645-1654. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000564.
8
Predictive factors of chronic pain and disability in whiplash: a Delphi poll.挥鞭样损伤后慢性疼痛和残疾的预测因素:德尔菲法调查
Eur J Pain. 2008 Jan;12(1):30-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2007.02.004. Epub 2007 Apr 2.
9
The Impact of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder on Physiological Arousal, Disability, and Sensory Pain Thresholds in Patients With Chronic Whiplash.创伤后应激障碍对慢性挥鞭伤患者生理唤醒、残疾及感觉疼痛阈值的影响
Clin J Pain. 2016 Aug;32(8):645-53. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000309.
10
Trauma-focused cognitive behaviour therapy and exercise for chronic whiplash: protocol of a randomised, controlled trial.创伤聚焦认知行为疗法与运动治疗慢性挥鞭伤:一项随机对照试验方案
J Physiother. 2015 Oct;61(4):218. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantifying Impairments in the Subacute Phase of Whiplash Associated Disorders-A Cross-Sectional Study.量化挥鞭样损伤相关疾病亚急性期的功能障碍——一项横断面研究
Life (Basel). 2025 Mar 31;15(4):562. doi: 10.3390/life15040562.
2
Exploring sex as a moderator of other prognostic variables in whiplash associated disorder: An observational study.探讨性别在挥鞭样损伤相关障碍中作为其他预后变量的调节因素:一项观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 26;18(4):e0282640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282640. eCollection 2023.
3
Implementation of a novel stratified PAthway of CarE for common musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions in primary care: protocol for a multicentre pragmatic randomised controlled trial (the PACE MSK trial).
在初级保健中实施新型分层 PAthway of CarE 治疗常见肌肉骨骼 (MSK) 疾病的方案:多中心实用随机对照试验 (PACE MSK 试验) 协议。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 30;11(12):e057705. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057705.
4
Tolerability and efficacy of duloxetine for the prevention of persistent musculoskeletal pain after trauma and injury: a pilot three-group randomized controlled trial.度洛西汀预防创伤和损伤后持续性肌肉骨骼疼痛的耐受性和疗效:一项三臂随机对照试验。
Pain. 2023 Apr 1;164(4):855-863. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002782. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
5
A clinical test to assess isometric cervical strength in chronic whiplash associated disorder (WAD): a reliability study.一项评估慢性颈挥鞭伤相关障碍(WAD)等速颈椎力量的临床测试:一项可靠性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Aug 1;23(1):736. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05703-0.
6
Perceived Injustice as a Determinant of the Severity of Post-traumatic Stress Symptoms Following Occupational Injury.职业伤害后创伤后应激症状严重程度的决定因素:感知不公正。
J Occup Rehabil. 2023 Mar;33(1):134-144. doi: 10.1007/s10926-022-10056-5. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
7
Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms and Pain Sensitization After Whiplash Injury: A Longitudinal Cohort Study With Quantitative Sensory Testing.挥鞭样损伤后创伤后应激症状与疼痛敏化:一项采用定量感觉测试的纵向队列研究
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 15;3:908048. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2022.908048. eCollection 2022.
8
Do expectations of recovery improve risk assessment for people with whiplash-associated disorders? Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study.对颈背部挥鞭伤相关障碍患者的康复预期是否能改善风险评估?一项前瞻性队列研究的二次分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Apr 27;23(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05242-8.
9
Does Pain Extent Predict Ongoing Pain and Disability in Patients with Chronic Whiplash-Associated Disorders?疼痛程度能否预测慢性挥鞭样损伤相关疾病患者的持续性疼痛和残疾情况?
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 22;11(3):555. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030555.
10
Neurocognition after motor vehicle collision and adverse post-traumatic neuropsychiatric sequelae within 8 weeks: Initial findings from the AURORA study.机动车事故后神经认知功能障碍和 8 周内不良创伤后神经精神后遗症:AURORA 研究的初步发现。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Feb 1;298(Pt B):57-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.104. Epub 2021 Nov 17.