The Department of Vascular Surgery at Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 May;41(5):607-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.02.016. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
(i) Prevalence of stroke in neurologically symptomatic/asymptomatic patients with unilateral/bilateral carotid disease (including occlusion) undergoing cardiac surgery without prophylactic carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid stenting (CAS). (ii) Prevalence of stroke in asymptomatic patients with unilateral/bilateral carotid disease (excluding occlusion) who underwent isolated cardiac surgery. (iii) Prevalence of stroke in the hemisphere ipsilateral to a non-operated asymptomatic stenosis in patients with severe bilateral carotid disease undergoing a synchronous unilateral CEA + cardiac procedure.
Systematic Review and meta-analysis.
Cardiac surgery patients with a symptomatic/asymptomatic 50-99% stenosis or occlusion incurred a 7.4% stroke risk (95%CI 4.8-9.9), increasing to 9.1% (95%CI 4.8-16) in those with 80-99% stenoses or occlusion. After excluding patients with a history of stroke/TIA and those with isolated/bilateral occlusions, the stroke risk fell to 3.8% (95%CI 2.0-4.8) in patients with asymptomatic 50-99% stenoses and 2.0% in those with 70-99% stenoses (95%CI 1.0-5.7). The prevalence of ipsilateral stroke in patients with a unilateral, asymptomatic 50-99% stenosis was 2.0% (1.0-3.8), while the risk of any stroke was only 2.9% (2%-5.7%). These risks did not increase with stenosis severity (70-99%, 80-99%). Patients with bilateral, asymptomatic 50-99% stenoses or a 50-99% stenosis + contralateral occlusion incurred a 6.5% stroke risk following cardiac surgery, while the risk of death/stroke was 9.1% (3.8%-20.6%). Patients with bilateral 80-99% stenoses undergoing a unilateral synchronous cardiac/carotid revascularisation incurred a 5.7% risk of stroke in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the non-operated, contralateral stenosis.
There is no compelling evidence supporting a role for prophylactic CEA/CAS in cardiac surgery patients with unilateral asymptomatic carotid disease. Prophylactic CEA/CAS might still be considered in patients with severe, bilateral asymptomatic carotid disease, but such a strategy would only benefit 1-2% of all cardiac surgery patients.
(i)在未行预防性颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)或颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)的单侧/双侧颈动脉疾病(包括闭塞)伴神经症状/无症状的心脏手术患者中,卒中的发生率。(ii)在单侧颈动脉疾病(不包括闭塞)且仅行心脏手术的无症状患者中,卒中的发生率。(iii)在严重双侧颈动脉疾病且同期行单侧 CEA+心脏手术的患者中,对非手术侧无症状狭窄同侧半球发生卒中的发生率。
系统综述和荟萃分析。
伴症状性/无症状性 50-99%狭窄或闭塞的心脏手术患者卒中风险为 7.4%(95%CI 4.8-9.9),80-99%狭窄或闭塞患者卒中风险增至 9.1%(95%CI 4.8-16)。排除有卒中/TIA 病史的患者和孤立性/双侧闭塞患者后,无症状性 50-99%狭窄患者的卒中风险降至 3.8%(95%CI 2.0-4.8),70-99%狭窄患者的卒中风险降至 2.0%(95%CI 1.0-5.7)。单侧、无症状性 50-99%狭窄患者同侧卒中的发生率为 2.0%(1.0-3.8),而任何卒中的风险仅为 2.9%(2%-5.7%)。这些风险与狭窄严重程度(70-99%,80-99%)无关。双侧无症状性 50-99%狭窄或 50-99%狭窄+对侧闭塞的心脏手术后患者卒中风险为 6.5%,而死亡/卒中风险为 9.1%(3.8%-20.6%)。同期行单侧心脏/颈动脉血运重建术的双侧 80-99%狭窄患者,未手术侧对侧狭窄同侧半球卒中风险为 5.7%。
无确切证据支持预防性 CEA/CAS 应用于单侧无症状性颈动脉疾病的心脏手术患者。严重双侧无症状性颈动脉疾病患者仍可考虑预防性 CEA/CAS,但该策略仅使所有心脏手术患者中的 1-2%获益。