• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者行冠状动脉搭桥术联合颈动脉内膜切除术与单纯冠状动脉搭桥术的多中心经验

CAS-OPCABG vs OPCABG-alone in patients with asymptomatic carotid Stenosis: Multi-center experience.

作者信息

Wen Mingxiu, Li Jinzhang, Jia Songhao, Wang Shipan, Zhao Shuanglei, Su Pixiong, Xu Dong, Gong Ming

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Beijing Lab for Cardiovascular Precision Medicine, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 Dec 14;56:101497. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101497. eCollection 2025 Feb.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101497
PMID:39790479
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11714374/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to evaluate the relationship between carotid stenting and off-pump coronary artery grafting (CAS-OPCABG) and OPCABG only in patients with asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis.

METHODS

This study retrospectively included 669 patients with asymptomatic severe carotid artery stenosis who underwent OPCABG at multiple centers. After propensity score matching for baseline characteristics, the study compared two groups of patients with clinical data, early and midterm death, stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI).

RESULTS

After matching, there was no significant difference between two groups at baseline. The rates of early stroke, midterm stroke, and intensive care unit (ICU) stay were significantly lower in the CAS OPCABG group, yet the use of the internal mammary artery (IMA) was comparatively lower. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that there was no significant difference in midterm mortality between two groups. In the bilateral asymptomatic carotid stenosis subgroup, the early stroke rate was significantly lower after CAS-OPCABG, but there was no significant difference in the unilateral carotid stenosis subgroup. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified previous atrial fibrillation, previous stroke, aortic atherosclerosis, bilateral carotid stenosis and the use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) as significant risk factors for early postoperative stroke, CAS emerged as a protective factor. Use of IMA was found to be a protective factor against postoperative mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

CAS-OPCABG is an efficacious and safe approach for the treatment of asymptomatic severe carotid artery stenosis, effectively decreasing the incidence of postoperative stroke.

摘要

目的

旨在评估无症状重度颈动脉狭窄患者行颈动脉支架置入术与非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(CAS-OPCABG)及单纯OPCABG之间的关系。

方法

本研究回顾性纳入了多家中心行OPCABG的669例无症状重度颈动脉狭窄患者。在对基线特征进行倾向评分匹配后,研究比较了两组患者的临床资料、早期和中期死亡、卒中及心肌梗死(MI)情况。

结果

匹配后,两组在基线时无显著差异。CAS-OPCABG组的早期卒中、中期卒中和重症监护病房(ICU)住院率显著更低,但乳内动脉(IMA)的使用率相对较低。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,两组中期死亡率无显著差异。在双侧无症状颈动脉狭窄亚组中,CAS-OPCABG术后早期卒中率显著更低,但在单侧颈动脉狭窄亚组中无显著差异。多因素逻辑回归分析确定既往房颤、既往卒中、主动脉粥样硬化、双侧颈动脉狭窄及主动脉内球囊泵(IABP)的使用为术后早期卒中的显著危险因素,CAS为保护因素。发现IMA的使用是预防术后死亡的保护因素。

结论

CAS-OPCABG是治疗无症状重度颈动脉狭窄的一种有效且安全的方法,可有效降低术后卒中发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5067/11714374/3df50e0c5b3c/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5067/11714374/d10666e6d103/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5067/11714374/3df50e0c5b3c/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5067/11714374/d10666e6d103/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5067/11714374/3df50e0c5b3c/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
CAS-OPCABG vs OPCABG-alone in patients with asymptomatic carotid Stenosis: Multi-center experience.无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者行冠状动脉搭桥术联合颈动脉内膜切除术与单纯冠状动脉搭桥术的多中心经验
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 Dec 14;56:101497. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101497. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Effect of on-pump vs. off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with non-dialysis-dependent severe renal impairment: propensity-matched analysis from the UK registry dataset.非透析依赖型严重肾功能损害患者体外循环与非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的效果:基于英国注册数据集的倾向匹配分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Feb 13;11:1341123. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1341123. eCollection 2024.
3
Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in elderly patients at 30 days: a propensity score matching study.非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗老年患者 30 天的比较:倾向评分匹配研究。
Postgrad Med J. 2024 May 18;100(1184):414-420. doi: 10.1093/postmj/qgad120.
4
Outcomes following carotid revascularization in patients with prior ipsilateral carotid artery stenting in the Vascular Quality Initiative.血管质量倡议中既往同侧颈动脉支架置入术后行颈动脉血运重建术的患者结局。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Dec;80(6):1705-1715.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.08.024. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
5
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting With and Without Manipulation of the Ascending Aorta: A Network Meta-Analysis.冠状动脉旁路移植术联合与不联合升主动脉操作:一项网状 Meta 分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Feb 28;69(8):924-936. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.071.
6
Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stents Should Be Used with Caution in Patients with Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis.对于无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者,经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术应谨慎使用。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;54:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
7
Primary carotid artery stenting versus carotid artery stenting for postcarotid endarterectomy stenosis.原发性颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术后狭窄的颈动脉支架置入术对比
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Nov;50(5):1031-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.06.051. Epub 2009 Aug 22.
8
Myocardial revascularization by off pump coronary bypass surgery (OPCABG): a ten year review.非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术(OPCABG)心肌血运重建:十年回顾
Ulster Med J. 2008 May;77(2):106-9.
9
Early outcomes after carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis.无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者行颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的早期疗效比较。
Stroke. 2015 Jan;46(1):120-5. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006209. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
10
Effect of a significant asymptomatic unilateral carotid artery stenosis on outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.严重无症状单侧颈动脉狭窄对接受冠状动脉旁路移植术患者预后的影响。
Kardiol Pol. 2014;72(10):954-9. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2014.0113.

本文引用的文献

1
Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease.编辑推荐——欧洲血管外科学会(ESVS)2023年动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉和椎动脉疾病管理临床实践指南
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Jan;65(1):7-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.04.011. Epub 2022 May 20.
2
Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines for management of extracranial cerebrovascular disease.血管外科学会颅外脑血管疾病管理临床实践指南
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1S):4S-22S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.04.073. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
3
Concomitant carotid endarterectomy and cardiac surgery does not decrease postoperative stroke rates.
同期颈动脉内膜切除术和心脏手术并不会降低术后脑卒中发生率。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Aug;72(2):589-596.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.10.072. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
4
Association Between Coronary Artery Bypass Surgical Techniques and Postoperative Stroke.冠状动脉旁路手术技术与术后中风的关联。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Dec 17;8(24):e013650. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013650. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
5
Editor's Choice - Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease: 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS).编辑推荐——动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉和椎动脉疾病的管理:欧洲血管外科学会(ESVS)2017年临床实践指南
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Jan;55(1):3-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.06.021. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
6
Comparison of Trends and In-Hospital Outcomes of Concurrent Carotid Artery Revascularization and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: The United States Experience 2004 to 2012.比较 2004 年至 2012 年美国同期颈动脉血运重建术和冠状动脉旁路移植术的趋势和院内结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Feb 13;10(3):286-298. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.11.032.
7
Long-Term Results of Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Carotid-Artery Stenosis.颈动脉狭窄支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术的长期结果
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 17;374(11):1021-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505215. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
8
Morbidity but not mortality is decreased after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术后发病率降低,但死亡率未降低。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Mar;97(3):831-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.08.062. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
9
Staged carotid artery stenting and coronary artery bypass surgery versus isolated coronary artery bypass surgery in concomitant coronary and carotid disease.分期颈动脉支架置入术与冠状动脉搭桥术对比单纯冠状动脉搭桥术治疗合并冠心病和颈动脉疾病
J Invasive Cardiol. 2013 Jan;25(1):8-12.
10
Stroke after cardiac surgery and its association with asymptomatic carotid disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.心脏手术后的中风及其与无症状颈动脉疾病的关系:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 May;41(5):607-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.02.016. Epub 2011 Mar 10.