• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

输精管切除术:另一种(更好的)绝育形式。

Vasectomy: the other (better) form of sterilization.

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA.

出版信息

Contraception. 2011 Apr;83(4):310-5. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.08.019. Epub 2010 Oct 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2010.08.019
PMID:21397087
Abstract

Male sterilization (vasectomy) is the most effective form and only long-acting form of contraception available to men in the United States. Compared to female sterilization, it is more efficacious, more cost-effective, and has lower rates of complications. Despite these advantages, in the United States, vasectomy is utilized at less than half the rate of female sterilization. In addition, vasectomy is least utilized among black and Latino populations, groups with the highest rates of female sterilization. This review provides an overview of vasectomy use and techniques, and explores reasons for the disparity in vasectomy utilization in the United States.

摘要

男性绝育(输精管切除术)是美国男性可用的最有效且唯一长效的避孕形式。与女性绝育相比,它更有效、更具成本效益,且并发症发生率更低。尽管有这些优势,但在美国,输精管切除术的使用率还不到女性绝育的一半。此外,输精管切除术在黑人和拉丁裔人群中的使用率最低,而这两个群体的女性绝育率最高。本文综述了输精管切除术的使用和技术,并探讨了美国输精管切除术使用率差异的原因。

相似文献

1
Vasectomy: the other (better) form of sterilization.输精管切除术:另一种(更好的)绝育形式。
Contraception. 2011 Apr;83(4):310-5. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.08.019. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
2
Bringing men to the table: sterilization can be for him or for her.让男性参与进来:绝育可以是为了他,也可以是为了她。
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;57(4):731-40. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000060.
3
Reversing the United States sterilization paradox by increasing vasectomy utilization.通过提高输精管切除术的使用率来扭转美国绝育的悖论。
Contraception. 2011 Apr;83(4):289-90. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.08.017. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
4
Contraceptive sterilization use among married men in the United States: results from the male sample of the National Survey of Family Growth.美国已婚男性避孕绝育措施使用情况:全国家庭增长调查男性样本结果。
Contraception. 2010 Sep;82(3):230-5. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.03.018. Epub 2010 Jul 15.
5
Sterilization.灭菌
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;111(1):189-203. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000298621.98372.62.
6
He's a real man: a qualitative study of the social context of couples' vasectomy decisions among a racially diverse population.他是个真正的男人:一项关于不同种族人群夫妇间输精管切除术决定的社会背景的定性研究。
Am J Mens Health. 2013 May;7(3):206-13. doi: 10.1177/1557988312465888. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
7
IMAP statement on voluntary surgical contraception (sterilization).国际助产士联合会关于自愿手术避孕(绝育)的声明。
IPPF Med Bull. 1993 Jun;27(3):1-2.
8
The provision of sterilization services by private physicians.私人医生提供的绝育服务。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1985 Sep-Oct;17(5):216-20.
9
[Vasectomy: who regrets it and why?].
Ugeskr Laeger. 1994 Apr 18;156(16):2377-80.
10
Sterilization.灭菌
Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1984 Dec;11(3):603-40.

引用本文的文献

1
A review of the changing landscape of vasectomy trends in the United States in the post-dobbs era.对多布斯时代后美国输精管切除术趋势变化格局的综述。
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Apr 4. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01053-2.
2
Vasectomy and prostate cancer risk: a pooled of cohort studies and Mendelian randomization analysis.输精管切除术与前列腺癌风险:队列研究与孟德尔随机化分析的汇总
BMC Cancer. 2025 Feb 24;25(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13750-8.
3
Physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs regarding practices of male and female surgical sterilization procedures in Lebanon.
黎巴嫩医生对男性和女性手术绝育程序的知识、态度及信念。
Contracept Reprod Med. 2025 Jan 24;10(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40834-025-00336-9.
4
Associations of vasectomy with sexual dysfunctions and the sex life of middle-aged men.输精管结扎术与性功能障碍及中年男性性生活的关联。
Andrology. 2025 May;13(4):665-674. doi: 10.1111/andr.13804. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
5
Qualitative Analysis of Men's Involvement in Family Planning in The Philippines: An Ecological Assessment.菲律宾男性参与计划生育的定性分析:生态评估。
Am J Mens Health. 2023 Jul-Aug;17(4):15579883231191359. doi: 10.1177/15579883231191359.
6
Assessing Vasectomy-Related Information on YouTube: An Analysis of the Quality, Understandability, and Actionability of Information.评估 YouTube 上的输精管切除术相关信息:信息质量、可理解性和可操作性分析。
Am J Mens Health. 2022 Mar-Apr;16(2):15579883221094716. doi: 10.1177/15579883221094716.
7
Association between vasectomy and risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.输精管切除术与前列腺癌风险之间的关联:一项荟萃分析。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Dec;24(4):962-975. doi: 10.1038/s41391-021-00368-7. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
8
Male partners and medical staff's perception on contributing factors of Family Planning (FP) in Fiji.男性伴侣及医务人员对斐济计划生育影响因素的看法。
Heliyon. 2021 Jan 24;7(1):e06068. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06068. eCollection 2021 Jan.
9
Married Men and Vasectomy: A Focused Group Study in an Urban Community in Ghana.已婚男性与输精管切除术:加纳一个城市社区的焦点小组研究
SAGE Open Nurs. 2018 Oct 26;4:2377960818790380. doi: 10.1177/2377960818790380. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
10
Male Contraception.男性避孕。
Yale J Biol Med. 2020 Sep 30;93(4):603-613. eCollection 2020 Sep.