• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

右侧经腹腔镜单部位供肾切取术是否可行?

Is right-sided laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy feasible?

机构信息

Department of Urology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA.

出版信息

Urology. 2011 Jun;77(6):1365-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.09.064. Epub 2011 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2010.09.064
PMID:21397302
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To present our initial experience with right-sided laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy (LESS-RDN). Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) donor nephrectomy, although in its infancy, represents a potential exciting advancement over conventional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN). Almost all of the reported cases thus far have been left-sided kidneys.

METHODS

Between August 2009 and June 2010, a total of 85 consecutive LESS DN were performed. Of these, 6 (7%) were LESS-RDN. Donor outcomes analyzed included operative time, estimated blood loss, complications, visual analog pain scores, and recovery time. Renal vein lengths were measured on preoperative computed tomography scans. Recipient outcomes analyzed included recipient creatinine at discharge and at 1 and 3 months. All data were prospectively accrued in an institutional review board-approved database.

RESULTS

Five LESS-RDN were successfully performed. One case was converted to hand-assisted laparoscopy to optimize hilar dissection. The mean (± SE) operative time until allograft extraction was 89 ± 5.1 minutes, total operative time was 146 ± 12.8 minutes, warm ischemia time was 3.9 ± 0.2 minutes, and estimated blood loss was 92 ± 27 mL. The mean renal vein length was 2.7 ± 0.3 cm. There were no perioperative complications. All allografts functioned after transplantation. When compared with a matched cohort of LESS-LDN, there was no difference in allograft function at discharge and at 1 and 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Although technically challenging, LESS-RDN in experienced hands can be performed safely and should be considered as an alternative if it is the preferred kidney for transplantation.

摘要

目的

介绍我们在右侧经腹腔镜单部位供肾切取术(LESS-RDN)方面的初步经验。虽然经腹腔镜单部位(LESS)供肾切取术尚处于起步阶段,但它代表了一种相对于传统腹腔镜供肾切取术(LDN)的潜在令人兴奋的进步。迄今为止,几乎所有报道的病例都是左侧肾脏。

方法

2009 年 8 月至 2010 年 6 月,共进行了 85 例连续的 LESS-DN,其中 6 例(7%)为 LESS-RDN。分析了供者的手术时间、估计失血量、并发症、视觉模拟疼痛评分和恢复时间等结果。术前 CT 扫描测量肾静脉长度。分析了受者的出院时和 1 个月、3 个月时的肌酐水平。所有数据均前瞻性地纳入机构审查委员会批准的数据库中。

结果

5 例 LESS-RDN 手术成功完成。1 例转为手助腹腔镜以优化肾门解剖。供肾取出的平均(± SE)手术时间为 89±5.1 分钟,总手术时间为 146±12.8 分钟,热缺血时间为 3.9±0.2 分钟,估计失血量为 92±27ml。平均肾静脉长度为 2.7±0.3cm。无围手术期并发症。所有移植物在移植后均能正常工作。与 LESS-LDN 相匹配的队列相比,在出院时和 1 个月、3 个月时的移植物功能无差异。

结论

虽然具有挑战性,但在有经验的医生手中,LESS-RDN 可以安全地进行,并且如果它是首选的移植肾,应考虑作为一种替代方法。

相似文献

1
Is right-sided laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy feasible?右侧经腹腔镜单部位供肾切取术是否可行?
Urology. 2011 Jun;77(6):1365-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.09.064. Epub 2011 Mar 12.
2
Comparison of right and left laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.腹腔镜下右半与左半活体供肾切除术的比较。
BJU Int. 2006 Oct;98(4):843-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06429.x.
3
Laparoendoscopic single site live donor nephrectomy: initial experience.经脐单部位腹腔镜活体供肾切除术:初步经验。
J Urol. 2010 Nov;184(5):2049-53. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.138. Epub 2010 Sep 18.
4
Is reluctance to right-sided laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy justified?对右侧腹腔镜活体供肾肾切除术的抵触是否合理?
Eur Urol. 2007 May;51(5):1171-2. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.021. Epub 2007 Jan 12.
5
Comparison of complications of laparoscopic versus laparoendoscopic single site donor nephrectomy using the modified Clavien grading system.采用改良 Clavien 分级系统比较腹腔镜与经脐单孔腹腔镜供肾切取术的并发症。
J Urol. 2011 Oct;186(4):1386-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.05.053.
6
Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy and conventional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: donor and recipient outcomes.腹腔镜单部位供肾切取术与传统腹腔镜供肾切取术的比较:供者和受者结局。
Urology. 2011 Dec;78(6):1332-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.04.077. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
7
Comparison of laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) and conventional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy at a single institution.单中心腹腔镜下单部位手术(LESS)与传统腹腔镜供肾切术的比较。
BJU Int. 2013 Jul;112(2):198-206. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11763.x. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
8
Pfannenstiel laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) vs conventional multiport laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.经脐单部位腹腔镜与传统多孔腹腔镜活体供肾切取术的前瞻性随机对照研究。
BJU Int. 2013 Sep;112(5):616-22. doi: 10.1111/bju.12202. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
9
Why we consistently use the left donor kidney in living related transplantation: initial experience of right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and comparison with left nephrectomy.为何我们在亲属活体肾移植中持续选用左侧供肾:右侧腹腔镜供肾切除术的初步经验及与左侧肾切除术的比较
Transplant Proc. 2006 Sep;38(7):1977-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.06.023.
10
Laparoendoscopic single-site plus one trocar donor nephrectomy using the GelPort: initial clinical experience.经 GelPort 行腹腔镜单部位附加一穿刺器供肾切除术:初步临床经验。
Urology. 2013 Feb;81(2):308-12. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.09.048.

引用本文的文献

1
Maximizing the donor pool: left versus right laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy--systematic review and meta-analysis.扩大供体库:腹腔镜下左肾与右肾活体供肾切除术的比较——系统评价与荟萃分析
Int Urol Nephrol. 2014 Aug;46(8):1511-9. doi: 10.1007/s11255-014-0671-8. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
2
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in kidney surgery: clinical experience and future perspectives.腹腔镜单孔手术在肾脏手术中的应用:临床经验与未来展望。
Curr Urol Rep. 2013 Oct;14(5):496-505. doi: 10.1007/s11934-013-0346-5.
3
Laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy.
腹腔镜单孔供体肾切除术
Indian J Urol. 2012 Jan;28(1):65-70. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.94960.