Suppr超能文献

细胞外液容量与肾小球滤过率:它们在肾病患者和健康个体中的关系及变异性

Extracellular fluid volume and glomerular filtration rate: their relation and variabilities in patients with renal disease and healthy individuals.

作者信息

Peters A Michael, Glass Daphne M, Bird Nicholas J

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Harley St Clinic, London, UK.

出版信息

Nucl Med Commun. 2011 Jul;32(7):649-53. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e3283457466.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The slope-only technique for measuring glomerular filtration rate (GFR) relies on extracellular fluid volume (ECV) remaining within narrow limits. Although this requirement is met in healthy individuals, ECV may deviate or vary more in patients with abnormal renal function.

METHODS

We examined the correlation between surface area-scaled ECV and GFR, and their coefficients of variation (CVs), measured from simultaneous, multisample clearances of 51Cr-EDTA and iohexol in 20 healthy volunteers and 60 patients with a range of renal functions. We also compared scaled GFR and ECV, and their CVs, measured from three-sample, slope-intercept clearance of 51Cr-EDTA in 921 patients routinely referred for GFR measurement.

RESULTS

In the 80 participants undergoing multisample, dual-indicator clearance, there was no correlation between GFR measured with one indicator and ECV measured with the other. CVs of GFR in the 60 patients were 48.1 and 44.6% for 51Cr-EDTA and iohexol, respectively, but the CVs of ECV were only 12.3 and 15.4%. These differences were less marked in the healthy participants with corresponding CVs of 13.9 and 14.9% for GFR, and 11.7 and 12.2% for ECV. There was no correlation between scaled GFR and ECV in patients having slope-intercept clearance; CVs of GFR and ECV were 32.4 and 17.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In unselected patient populations, there is no correlation between GFR and ECV. The CV of ECV is slightly higher in patients than healthy individuals but, in both, is less than the CV of GFR. These data do not detract from the use of slope-only GFR.

摘要

引言

仅基于斜率的肾小球滤过率(GFR)测量技术依赖于细胞外液体积(ECV)保持在狭窄范围内。虽然健康个体满足这一要求,但肾功能异常的患者中ECV可能会偏离或变化更大。

方法

我们检测了20名健康志愿者和60名具有不同肾功能的患者通过同时进行的51Cr - 乙二胺四乙酸(51Cr - EDTA)和碘海醇多样本清除率所测得的表面积标准化ECV与GFR之间的相关性,以及它们的变异系数(CVs)。我们还比较了921名常规进行GFR测量的患者通过51Cr - EDTA的三样本、斜率截距清除率所测得的标准化GFR和ECV及其CVs。

结果

在80名进行多样本、双指示剂清除率检测的参与者中,用一种指示剂测得的GFR与用另一种指示剂测得的ECV之间无相关性。60名患者中,51Cr - EDTA和碘海醇测得的GFR的CVs分别为48.1%和44.6%,但ECV的CVs仅为12.3%和15.4%。在健康参与者中这些差异不太明显,GFR的相应CVs为13.9%和14.9%,ECV的为11.7%和12.2%。进行斜率截距清除率检测的患者中,标准化GFR与ECV之间无相关性;GFR和ECV的CVs分别为32.4%和17.8%。

结论

在未经过筛选的患者群体中,GFR与ECV之间无相关性。患者中ECV的CV略高于健康个体,但两者均小于GFR的CV。这些数据并不影响仅基于斜率的GFR的应用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验