• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸段食管癌患者经胸食管切除术,清扫淋巴结总数不是复发的预后因素。

The total number of resected lymph node is not a prognostic factor for recurrence in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergone transthoracic esophagectomy.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Chutung Veterans Hospital, Hsinchu County, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 2011 Apr;103(5):416-20. doi: 10.1002/jso.21850.

DOI:10.1002/jso.21850
PMID:21400526
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The total number of resected lymph nodes (TLN) has been shown to predict survival in esophageal cancer, but its relationship with recurrence has been rarely reported. We aim to study the prognostic factors in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients, with a particular focus on the role of TLN.

METHODS

Two hundred sixty-eight ESCC patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy were selected for the study. A Cox regression model was used to identify prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Recurrence occurred in 115 of 268 patients. The median time to recurrence was 10 months (range, 1-58). The recurrence-free survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 62.3%, 32.1%, and 28.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified age (P = 0.001), N stage (N1-3 vs. N0, P = 0.001), tumor length (P = 0.019), and development of recurrence (P < 0.001) as independent prognostic factors for overall survival, whereas T (T3/4 vs. T1/2, P = 0.029) and N stage (N1-3 vs. N0, P = 0.017) were independent prognostic factors for recurrence. TLN was a significant factor only when predicting overall survival in N0 patients (HR, 0.976; 95% CI, 0.953-0.999; P = 0.042).

CONCLUSION

The TLN is not a prognostic factor for recurrence in ESCC patients undergone transthoracic esophagectomy.

摘要

背景

切除的淋巴结总数(TLN)已被证明可预测食管癌的生存率,但很少有报道其与复发的关系。我们旨在研究食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者的预后因素,特别关注 TLN 的作用。

方法

选择 268 例接受经胸食管切除术的 ESCC 患者进行研究。使用 Cox 回归模型确定预后因素。

结果

268 例患者中有 115 例复发。复发的中位时间为 10 个月(范围,1-58)。1、3 和 5 年无复发生存率分别为 62.3%、32.1%和 28.5%。多变量分析确定年龄(P=0.001)、N 分期(N1-3 与 N0,P=0.001)、肿瘤长度(P=0.019)和复发的发生(P<0.001)是总生存的独立预后因素,而 T 分期(T3/4 与 T1/2,P=0.029)和 N 分期(N1-3 与 N0,P=0.017)是复发的独立预后因素。仅当预测 N0 患者的总生存时,TLN 才是一个显著因素(HR,0.976;95%CI,0.953-0.999;P=0.042)。

结论

TLN 不是经胸食管切除术治疗的 ESCC 患者复发的预后因素。

相似文献

1
The total number of resected lymph node is not a prognostic factor for recurrence in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergone transthoracic esophagectomy.胸段食管癌患者经胸食管切除术,清扫淋巴结总数不是复发的预后因素。
J Surg Oncol. 2011 Apr;103(5):416-20. doi: 10.1002/jso.21850.
2
Prediction of lymph node status in superficial esophageal carcinoma.浅表性食管癌淋巴结状态的预测
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Nov;15(11):3278-88. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0065-1. Epub 2008 Aug 26.
3
[Influence of number of removed lymph nodes on the TNM staging and survival in advanced esophageal carcinoma].[切除淋巴结数量对晚期食管癌TNM分期及生存的影响]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2007 Aug;29(8):604-8.
4
Effect of the number of lymph nodes sampled on postoperative survival of lymph node-negative esophageal cancer.取样淋巴结数量对淋巴结阴性食管癌患者术后生存的影响。
Cancer. 2008 Mar 15;112(6):1239-46. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23309.
5
[Lymphatic metastasis intensity of and lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].[胸段食管鳞状细胞癌的淋巴转移强度及淋巴结清扫术]
Ai Zheng. 2006 May;25(5):604-8.
6
[Recurrence patterns of esophageal cancer after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy--a report of 196 cases].[Ivor-Lewis食管切除术后食管癌的复发模式——196例报告]
Ai Zheng. 2006 Jan;25(1):96-9.
7
[Analysis of the survival in patients after surgical resection of thoracic esophageal cancer].[胸段食管癌手术切除术后患者的生存分析]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2009 Jul;31(7):541-5.
8
Predicting systemic disease in patients with esophageal cancer after esophagectomy: a multinational study on the significance of the number of involved lymph nodes.食管癌切除术后患者全身性疾病的预测:关于受累淋巴结数量意义的多国研究
Ann Surg. 2008 Dec;248(6):979-85. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181904f3c.
9
Extracapsular lymph node involvement differs between squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.食管鳞状细胞癌和腺癌的囊外淋巴结受累情况有所不同。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Feb;16(2):447-53. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0248-9. Epub 2008 Nov 27.
10
Prognostic factors and patterns of recurrence in esophageal cancer assert arguments for extended two-field transthoracic esophagectomy.食管癌的预后因素和复发模式支持广泛的两野经胸食管癌切除术。
Am J Surg. 2010 Oct;200(4):446-53. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.12.006. Epub 2010 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Achieving adequate lymph node dissection in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinomas by radical lymphadenectomy: Beyond the scope of numbers of harvested lymph nodes.通过根治性淋巴结清扫术在治疗食管鳞状细胞癌时实现充分的淋巴结清扫:超越所收获淋巴结数量的范畴。
Oncol Lett. 2019 Aug;18(2):1617-1630. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10465. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
2
Determining the optimal number of lymph nodes harvested during esophagectomy.确定食管癌切除术中清扫淋巴结的最佳数量。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Jun;7(3):387-94. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2015.12.02.
3
Recurrence risk model for esophageal cancer after radical surgery.
根治性手术后食管癌的复发风险模型。
Chin J Cancer Res. 2013 Oct;25(5):549-55. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2013.10.05.
4
Open versus thoracoscopic esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.食管鳞状细胞癌患者开放性与胸腔镜下食管切除术的比较
World J Surg. 2014 Feb;38(2):402-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2265-5.
5
Adjuvant radiation therapy and lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer: a SEER database analysis.食管癌辅助放疗和淋巴结清扫术:SEER 数据库分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Aug;17(8):1339-45. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2192-7. Epub 2013 Jun 8.
6
Body mass index and perioperative complications after oesophagectomy for adenocarcinoma: a systematic database review.体质量指数与腺癌患者食管癌术后围手术期并发症:系统数据库回顾。
BMJ Open. 2013 May 2;3(5):e001336. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001336.