• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Determining the optimal number of lymph nodes harvested during esophagectomy.确定食管癌切除术中清扫淋巴结的最佳数量。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Jun;7(3):387-94. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2015.12.02.
2
Cervical lymph node metastasis classified as regional nodal staging in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after radical esophagectomy and three-field lymph node dissection.在根治性食管切除术和三野淋巴结清扫术后,颈淋巴结转移在胸段食管鳞状细胞癌中被归类为区域淋巴结分期。
BMC Surg. 2014 Dec 19;14:110. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-110.
3
Lymph node harvest in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.新辅助放化疗后食管癌的淋巴结清扫。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Sep;20(9):3038-43. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2988-4. Epub 2013 Apr 28.
4
Effect of the number of lymph nodes sampled on postoperative survival of lymph node-negative esophageal cancer.取样淋巴结数量对淋巴结阴性食管癌患者术后生存的影响。
Cancer. 2008 Mar 15;112(6):1239-46. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23309.
5
The number of lymph nodes with metastasis predicts survival in patients with esophageal or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma who receive preoperative chemoradiation.发生转移的淋巴结数量可预测接受术前放化疗的食管或食管胃交界腺癌患者的生存率。
Cancer. 2006 Mar 1;106(5):1017-25. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21693.
6
A study about different findings of PET-CT between neoadjuvant and non-neoadjuvant therapy: SUVmax is not a reliable predictor of lymphatic involvement after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer.一项关于新辅助治疗与非新辅助治疗之间PET-CT不同结果的研究:SUVmax并非食管癌新辅助治疗后淋巴结受累的可靠预测指标。
J Thorac Dis. 2016 May;8(5):784-94. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.03.20.
7
Association of Lymph Node Status With Survival in Patients After Liver Resection for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma in an Italian Multicenter Analysis.意大利多中心分析:肝门部胆管癌肝切除术后淋巴结状态与生存的关系。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Oct 1;151(10):916-922. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1769.
8
How does the number of resected lymph nodes influence TNM staging and prognosis for esophageal carcinoma?切除的淋巴结数量如何影响食管癌的 TNM 分期和预后?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Mar;17(3):784-90. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0818-5. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
9
Clinical fate of T0N1 esophageal cancer: results from the National Cancer Database.T0N1期食管癌的临床转归:来自国家癌症数据库的结果
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2018 Oct;9(5):880-886. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2018.08.08.
10
Therapeutic value of lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.新辅助化疗后食管癌鳞状细胞癌淋巴结清扫的治疗价值
J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jul;112(1):60-5. doi: 10.1002/jso.23965. Epub 2015 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Dissected Lymph Node Count and Positive Lymph Node Ratio Following Esophagectomy on Long-Term Outcomes in Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.食管癌切除术后清扫淋巴结数量及阳性淋巴结比例对长期预后的影响:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Ann Surg Open. 2025 Jun 13;6(2):e587. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000587. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Transcervical Endoscopic Esophageal Mobilization: An Approach to Transhiatal Esophagectomy.经宫颈内镜下食管游离术:一种经裂孔食管切除术的方法。
Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep. 2024 Sep 28;3(1):201-205. doi: 10.1016/j.atssr.2024.09.011. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Prognostic significance of the number of lymph nodes dissection in esophageal adenocarcinoma patients.食管腺癌患者淋巴结清扫数量的预后意义
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 May;9(5):3406-3415. doi: 10.21037/tcr-19-2802.
4
TRANSHIATAL ESOPHAGECTOMY IS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH POOR QUALITY LYMPHADENECTOMY.经胸食管切除术与淋巴结清扫质量不佳无关。
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2019 Dec 20;32(4):e1475. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020190001e1475. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
The total number of resected lymph node is not a prognostic factor for recurrence in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergone transthoracic esophagectomy.胸段食管癌患者经胸食管切除术,清扫淋巴结总数不是复发的预后因素。
J Surg Oncol. 2011 Apr;103(5):416-20. doi: 10.1002/jso.21850.
2
Cancer statistics, 2010.癌症统计数据,2010 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Sep-Oct;60(5):277-300. doi: 10.3322/caac.20073. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
3
Comparison of survival and recurrence pattern between two-field and three-field lymph node dissections for upper thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.比较二野和三野淋巴结清扫术治疗中上胸段食管鳞癌的生存和复发模式。
J Thorac Oncol. 2010 May;5(5):707-12. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181d3ccb2.
4
Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer.食管癌的最佳淋巴结清扫术。
Ann Surg. 2010 Jan;251(1):46-50. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b2f6ee.
5
The number of lymph nodes removed predicts survival in esophageal cancer: an international study on the impact of extent of surgical resection.切除的淋巴结数量可预测食管癌患者的生存率:一项关于手术切除范围影响的国际研究。
Ann Surg. 2008 Oct;248(4):549-56. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318188c474.
6
Effect of the number of lymph nodes sampled on postoperative survival of lymph node-negative esophageal cancer.取样淋巴结数量对淋巴结阴性食管癌患者术后生存的影响。
Cancer. 2008 Mar 15;112(6):1239-46. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23309.
7
Clinical impact of lymphadenectomy extent in resectable esophageal cancer.可切除食管癌淋巴结清扫范围的临床影响
J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Nov;11(11):1384-93; discussion 1393-4. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0264-2. Epub 2007 Sep 2.
8
Lymph node dissection impact on staging and survival of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, based on U.S. population data.基于美国人群数据,淋巴结清扫对肝外胆管癌分期及生存的影响。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Feb;11(2):158-65. doi: 10.1007/s11605-006-0018-6.
9
Extent of lymph node retrieval and pancreatic cancer survival: information from a large US population database.淋巴结清扫范围与胰腺癌生存率:来自美国大型人群数据库的信息
Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Sep;13(9):1189-200. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9016-x. Epub 2006 Sep 6.
10
Impact of total lymph node count on staging and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: data from a large US-population database.胃癌胃切除术后总淋巴结计数对分期及生存的影响:来自美国大型人群数据库的数据
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Oct 1;23(28):7114-24. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.14.621.

确定食管癌切除术中清扫淋巴结的最佳数量。

Determining the optimal number of lymph nodes harvested during esophagectomy.

作者信息

Almhanna Khaldoun, Weber Jill, Shridhar Ravi, Hoffe Sarah, Strosberg Jonathan, Meredith Kenneth

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida 334612, USA.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Jun;7(3):387-94. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2015.12.02.

DOI:10.21037/jgo.2015.12.02
PMID:27284471
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4880760/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We examined the impact of the number of lymph nodes (LNs) removed during esophagectomy on outcomes in esophageal cancer (EC).

METHODS

From a comprehensive EC database we identified patients who underwent curative resection from 1994 to 2011. The impact of total LNs retrieved on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was investigated.

RESULTS

In total, 635 patients were identified. Patients were divided on the basis of total number of LNs removed (<8, 9-12, 13-20, and >20). The 5-year OS and DFS rates for the group by LN category were (43%, 42%, 55%, and 36%, P=0.1836) and (44%, 37%, 46%, and 36%, P=0.5166), respectively. Total number of LNs assessed did not correlate with reduced risk of recurrence or improved survival. On multivariate analysis controlling for age, sex, histology, neoadjuvant therapy, only removal of 13-20 LN's correlated to improved oncologic outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In a tertiary cancer center, we demonstrated that only removal of 13-20 LNs during esophagectomy correlated to improved survival. While the importance of standardized pathologic examination and adequate nodal staging is of utmost importance for patients with EC undergoing esophagectomy the optimum number of LNs removed clearly warrants further investigation.

摘要

背景

我们研究了食管癌(EC)手术中切除的淋巴结数量对预后的影响。

方法

从一个全面的EC数据库中,我们确定了1994年至2011年接受根治性切除的患者。研究了获取的总淋巴结数量对无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)的影响。

结果

总共确定了635例患者。根据切除的淋巴结总数(<8、9 - 12、13 - 20和>20)对患者进行分组。按淋巴结类别分组的5年总生存率和无病生存率分别为(43%、42%、55%和36%,P = 0.1836)和(44%、37%、46%和36%,P = 0.5166)。评估的淋巴结总数与降低复发风险或改善生存率无关。在对年龄、性别、组织学、新辅助治疗进行多因素分析时,仅切除13 - 20枚淋巴结与改善肿瘤学结局相关。

结论

在一家三级癌症中心,我们证明食管癌手术中仅切除13 - 20枚淋巴结与生存率提高相关。虽然标准化病理检查和充分的淋巴结分期对接受食管癌手术的患者至关重要,但切除的最佳淋巴结数量显然值得进一步研究。