• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[一款无需额外储水的氧气浓缩器和加湿器的临床评估]

[Clinical evaluation of an oxygen concentrator and humidifier that does not require additional reservoir water].

作者信息

Burioka Naoto, Nakamoto Sachiko, Fukuoka Yasushi, Shimizu Eiji

机构信息

Division of School of Health Science, Department of Pathobiological Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University.

出版信息

Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai Zasshi. 2011 Feb;49(2):81-6.

PMID:21400902
Abstract

A conventional humidifier with a reservoir of water for humidification can produce micro-aerosols contaminated with bacteria. The present study was undertaken to determine the clinical efficiency of a membrane humidifier that does not require additional reservoir water. We analyzed relative room air humidity and oxygen levels obtained from 2 pressure-swing adsorption (PSA)-type oxygen concentrators with membrane humidifiers. A significant correlation was found between relative room air humidity and that of oxygen moistened by a membrane humidifier. Several patients with chronic respiratory failure experienced improvements in subjectively reported nasal dryness using an oxygen concentrator with a membrane humidifier. This device avoids the need to change reservoir water, and may improve patient quality of life in the home.

摘要

带有用于加湿的水箱的传统加湿器会产生被细菌污染的微气溶胶。本研究旨在确定一种无需额外水箱用水的膜式加湿器的临床效果。我们分析了从2台配备膜式加湿器的变压吸附(PSA)型制氧机获得的相对室内空气湿度和氧气水平。发现相对室内空气湿度与经膜式加湿器加湿的氧气的湿度之间存在显著相关性。几名慢性呼吸衰竭患者使用配备膜式加湿器的制氧机后,主观报告的鼻腔干燥情况有所改善。该设备无需更换水箱用水,可能会改善患者在家中的生活质量。

相似文献

1
[Clinical evaluation of an oxygen concentrator and humidifier that does not require additional reservoir water].[一款无需额外储水的氧气浓缩器和加湿器的临床评估]
Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai Zasshi. 2011 Feb;49(2):81-6.
2
Efficacy of newly developed pressure swing adsorption type oxygen concentrator with membrane humidifier: comparison with conventional oxygen concentrator with bubble water humidifier.新型带膜加湿器的变压吸附式制氧机的疗效:与传统带气泡水加湿器的制氧机的比较。
Intern Med. 1997 Dec;36(12):861-4. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.36.861.
3
Clinical and in vitro evaluation of membrane humidifier that does not require addition of water.无需加水的膜式加湿器的临床及体外评估
Respir Med. 2000 Jan;94(1):71-5. doi: 10.1053/rmed.1999.0673.
4
Clinical utility of a newly developed pressure swing adsorption-type oxygen concentrator with a membrane humidifier.一种新开发的带有膜加湿器的变压吸附式制氧机的临床应用
Respiration. 1997;64(4):268-72. doi: 10.1159/000196685.
5
Bacterial colonisation of humidifier attachments on oxygen concentrators prescribed for long term oxygen therapy: a district review.长期氧疗用制氧机加湿器附件的细菌定植情况:一项地区性综述
Thorax. 1991 Apr;46(4):257-8. doi: 10.1136/thx.46.4.257.
6
Humidification of inspired oxygen is increased with pre-nasal cannula, compared to intranasal cannula.与经鼻插管相比,经鼻前导管可增加吸入氧气的湿化。
Respir Care. 2013 Aug;58(8):1323-8. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02215. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
7
Bacterial contamination potential of sterile, prefilled humidifiers and nebulizer reservoirs.
Heart Lung. 1979 Nov-Dec;8(6):1117-21.
8
[Characteristics of several humidifiers for CPAP-therapy, invasive and non-invasive ventilation and oxygen therapy under standardised climatic conditions in a climatic chamber].[在气候舱标准化气候条件下,用于持续气道正压通气治疗、有创和无创通气及氧疗的几种加湿器的特性]
Pneumologie. 2008 Jun;62(6):324-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1038127.
9
Filters reduce the risk of bacterial transmission from contaminated heated humidifiers used with CPAP for obstructive sleep apnea.过滤器可降低使用持续气道正压通气(CPAP)治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停时,受污染的加热加湿器造成细菌传播的风险。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2007 Dec 15;3(7):700-5.
10
A comparison of the rate of bacterial contamination for prefilled disposable and reusable oxygen humidifiers.预填充一次性和可重复使用的氧气加湿器细菌污染率的比较。
J Crit Care. 2005 Jun;20(2):172-5; discussion 175. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2005.01.002.