• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病管理能否在基层医疗环境中安全地转由执业护士负责?一项随机对照试验。

Can diabetes management be safely transferred to practice nurses in a primary care setting? A randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Diabetes Centre, Isala Clinics, Langerhans Medical Research Foundation, Zwolle, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2011 May;20(9-10):1264-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03562.x. Epub 2011 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03562.x
PMID:21401764
Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in a primary care setting can be safely transferred to practice nurses.

BACKGROUND

Because of the increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus and the burden of caring for individual patients, the demand type 2 diabetes mellitus patients place on primary health care resources has become overwhelming.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial.

METHODS

The patients in the intervention group were cared for by practice nurses who treated glucose levels, blood pressure and lipid profile according to a specified protocol. The control group received conventional care from a general practitioner. The primary outcome measure was the mean decrease seen in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels at the end of the follow-up period (14 months).

RESULTS

A total of 230 patients was randomised with 206 completing the study. The between-group differences with respect to reduction in HbA1c, blood pressure and lipid profile were not significant. Blood pressure decreased significantly in both groups; 7.4/3.2 mm Hg in the intervention group and 5.6/1.0 mm Hg in the control group. In both groups, more patients met the target values goals for lipid profile compared to baseline. In the intervention group, there was some deterioration in the health-related quality of life and an increase in diabetes-related symptoms. Patients being treated by a practice nurse were more satisfied with their treatment than those being treated by a general practitioner.

CONCLUSION

Practice nurses achieved results, which were comparable to those achieved by a general practitioner with respect to clinical parameters with better patient satisfaction.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

This study shows that diabetes management in primary care can be safely transferred to practice nurses.

摘要

目的和目标

确定在初级保健环境中管理 2 型糖尿病是否可以安全地转移给执业护士。

背景

由于 2 型糖尿病的患病率不断增加以及照顾个体患者的负担增加,2 型糖尿病患者对初级卫生保健资源的需求已经不堪重负。

设计

随机对照试验。

方法

干预组的患者由执业护士照顾,他们根据特定方案治疗血糖水平、血压和血脂谱。对照组接受全科医生的常规护理。主要观察指标是随访期结束时(14 个月)糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平的平均下降。

结果

共随机分配了 230 名患者,其中 206 名完成了研究。在 HbA1c、血压和血脂谱方面,两组之间的降低差异无统计学意义。两组的血压均显著下降;干预组下降 7.4/3.2mmHg,对照组下降 5.6/1.0mmHg。在两组中,与基线相比,更多的患者达到了血脂谱的目标值。在干预组中,健康相关生活质量有所恶化,糖尿病相关症状有所增加。接受执业护士治疗的患者比接受全科医生治疗的患者对治疗更满意。

结论

执业护士在临床参数方面取得了与全科医生相当的结果,同时患者满意度更高。

临床相关性

本研究表明,初级保健中的糖尿病管理可以安全地转移给执业护士。

相似文献

1
Can diabetes management be safely transferred to practice nurses in a primary care setting? A randomised controlled trial.糖尿病管理能否在基层医疗环境中安全地转由执业护士负责?一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Nurs. 2011 May;20(9-10):1264-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03562.x. Epub 2011 Mar 15.
2
A randomised controlled trial to compare minimally invasive glucose monitoring devices with conventional monitoring in the management of insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (MITRE).一项比较微创血糖监测设备与传统监测方法在胰岛素治疗糖尿病管理中的随机对照试验(MITRE)。
Health Technol Assess. 2009 May;13(28):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta13280.
3
Diabetes specialist nurse as main care provider for patients with type 2 diabetes.糖尿病专科护士作为2型糖尿病患者的主要护理提供者。
Neth J Med. 2009 Jul-Aug;67(7):279-84.
4
Model of care for the management of complex Type 2 diabetes managed in the community by primary care physicians with specialist support: an open controlled trial.社区中由初级保健医生管理伴有专科支持的复杂 2 型糖尿病的护理模式:一项开放对照试验。
Diabet Med. 2013 Sep;30(9):1112-21. doi: 10.1111/dme.12251. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
5
Nurse-led psychological intervention for type 2 diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial (Diabetes-6 study) in primary care.护士主导的 2 型糖尿病心理干预:初级保健中的一项集群随机对照试验(Diabetes-6 研究)。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Aug;68(673):e531-e540. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X696185. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
6
A prospective clinical trial of specialist renal nursing in the primary care setting to prevent progression of chronic kidney: a quality improvement report.一项在基层医疗环境中开展的专科肾脏护理预防慢性肾脏病进展的前瞻性临床试验:质量改进报告。
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Sep 20;15:155. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-155.
7
Effectiveness of a training course for general practice nurses in motivation support in type 2 diabetes care: a cluster-randomised trial.针对全科护士开展的2型糖尿病护理动机支持培训课程的效果:一项整群随机试验。
PLoS One. 2014 May 5;9(5):e96683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096683. eCollection 2014.
8
Patient Engagement and Coaching for Health: The PEACH study--a cluster randomised controlled trial using the telephone to coach people with type 2 diabetes to engage with their GPs to improve diabetes care: a study protocol.患者健康参与与指导:PEACH研究——一项整群随机对照试验,通过电话指导2型糖尿病患者与全科医生合作以改善糖尿病护理:研究方案
BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Apr 11;8:20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-20.
9
Effectiveness of general practice based, practice nurse led telephone coaching on glycaemic control of type 2 diabetes: the Patient Engagement and Coaching for Health (PEACH) pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.基于全科医疗、由执业护士主导的电话辅导对 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制的效果:患者参与和健康辅导(PEACH)实用性群组随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2013 Sep 18;347:f5272. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5272.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Glycemic Control in Adult Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Receiving Care Through a Nurse-Led Diabetic Follow-Up Clinic Versus Conventional Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial.通过护士主导的糖尿病随访诊所与传统护理对2型糖尿病成年患者进行血糖控制:一项随机对照试验。
Cureus. 2025 Feb 25;17(2):e79659. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79659. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Patient Experience in Older Adults with Diabetes: A Narrative Review on Interventions to Improve Patient Experience and Research Gaps.老年糖尿病患者的就医体验:关于改善就医体验的干预措施及研究差距的叙述性综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Dec 13;12(24):2530. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12242530.
3
Effects of task-shifting from primary care physicians to nurses: an overview of systematic reviews.
从初级保健医生向护士进行任务转移的效果:系统评价概述。
Hum Resour Health. 2024 Nov 11;22(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12960-024-00956-3.
4
Advanced Practice Providers in Burn Care, 2013-2022.2013 - 2022年烧伤护理领域的高级执业提供者
J Burn Care Res. 2025 Jan 24;46(1):166-170. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irae179.
5
The effectiveness of the role of advanced nurse practitioners compared to physician-led or usual care: A systematic review.与医生主导的护理或常规护理相比,高级执业护士角色的有效性:一项系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2021 Jun 17;3:100034. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2021.100034. eCollection 2021 Nov.
6
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.糖尿病护理质量改进策略:对成年糖尿病患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513.
7
How does the quality of care for type 2 diabetic patients benefit from GPs-nurses' teamwork? A staggered difference-in-differences design based on a French pilot program.2 型糖尿病患者的护理质量如何从全科医生-护士团队合作中受益?基于法国试点项目的双重差分设计。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2023 Sep;23(3):433-466. doi: 10.1007/s10754-023-09354-z. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
8
Leveraging Registered Dietitian Nutritionists and Registered Nurses in Medication Management to Reduce Therapeutic Inertia.利用注册营养师和注册护士进行药物管理以减少治疗惰性。
Diabetes Spectr. 2022 Fall;35(4):491-503. doi: 10.2337/ds21-0104. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
9
Educational Strategies to Promote Adherence to Treatment in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease.促进心血管疾病患者治疗依从性的教育策略。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 10;19(16):9841. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169841.
10
Non-adherence to guideline recommendations for insulins: a qualitative study amongst primary care practitioners.不遵守胰岛素指南推荐:基层医疗保健从业者的定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jun 13;23(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01760-5.