Suppr超能文献

基于全科医疗、由执业护士主导的电话辅导对 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制的效果:患者参与和健康辅导(PEACH)实用性群组随机对照试验。

Effectiveness of general practice based, practice nurse led telephone coaching on glycaemic control of type 2 diabetes: the Patient Engagement and Coaching for Health (PEACH) pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

General Practice and Primary Health Care Academic Centre, University of Melbourne, 200 Berkeley St, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ. 2013 Sep 18;347:f5272. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5272.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of goal focused telephone coaching by practice nurses in improving glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes in Australia.

DESIGN

Prospective, cluster randomised controlled trial, with general practices as the unit of randomisation.

SETTING

General practices in Victoria, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

59 of 69 general practices that agreed to participate recruited sufficient patients and were randomised. Of 829 patients with type 2 diabetes (glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) >7.5% in the past 12 months) who were assessed for eligibility, 473 (236 from 30 intervention practices and 237 from 29 control practices) agreed to participate.

INTERVENTION

Practice nurses from intervention practices received two days of training in a telephone coaching programme, which aimed to deliver eight telephone and one face to face coaching episodes per patient.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary end point was mean absolute change in HbA1c between baseline and 18 months in the intervention group compared with the control group.

RESULTS

The intervention and control patients were similar at baseline. None of the practices dropped out over the study period; however, patient attrition rates were 5% in each group (11/236 and 11/237 in the intervention and control group, respectively). The median number of coaching sessions received by the 236 intervention patients was 3 (interquartile range 1-5), of which 25% (58/236) did not receive any coaching sessions. At 18 months' follow-up the effect on glycaemic control did not differ significantly (mean difference 0.02, 95% confidence interval -0.20 to 0.24, P=0.84) between the intervention and control groups, adjusted for HbA1c measured at baseline and the clustering. Other biochemical and clinical outcomes were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A practice nurse led telephone coaching intervention implemented in the real world primary care setting produced comparable outcomes to usual primary care in Australia. The addition of a goal focused coaching role onto the ongoing generalist role of a practice nurse without prescribing rights was found to be ineffective.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN50662837.

摘要

目的

评估以目标为导向的执业护士电话辅导在改善澳大利亚 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制方面的效果。

设计

前瞻性、集群随机对照试验,以全科医生为随机单位。

地点

澳大利亚维多利亚州的全科医生诊所。

参与者

69 家同意参与的全科医生诊所中,有 59 家招募了足够的患者并进行了随机分组。在评估了 829 名糖化血红蛋白(过去 12 个月内>7.5%)合格的 2 型糖尿病患者中,有 473 名(30 家干预实践中的 236 名和 29 家对照实践中的 237 名)同意参与。

干预措施

干预实践中的执业护士接受了为期两天的电话辅导方案培训,该方案旨在为每位患者提供 8 次电话和 1 次面对面辅导。

主要观察指标

主要终点为干预组与对照组之间在基线和 18 个月时 HbA1c 的平均绝对变化。

结果

干预组和对照组患者在基线时相似。在研究期间,没有任何实践退出;然而,每组的患者流失率为 5%(干预组 11/236,对照组 11/237)。236 名干预患者接受的辅导课程中位数为 3 次(四分位间距 1-5),其中 25%(58/236)未接受任何辅导课程。在 18 个月的随访中,血糖控制效果在干预组和对照组之间没有显著差异(平均差异 0.02,95%置信区间 -0.20 至 0.24,P=0.84),调整了基线时的 HbA1c 和聚类因素。两组的其他生化和临床结局相似。

结论

在澳大利亚真实的初级保健环境中实施的以执业护士为主导的电话辅导干预措施与常规初级保健的效果相当。在没有处方权的情况下,将以目标为导向的辅导角色添加到执业护士的常规角色中,被发现是无效的。

试验注册

当前对照试验 ISRCTN50662837。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b99/4793434/b3c2481a512b/blai012129.f1_default.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验