• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Where to manage community acquired pneumonia? The assessment of severity].

作者信息

Bui H N, Vargas F, Gruson D, Hilbert G

机构信息

Service de réanimation médicale, hôpital Pellegrin, CHU de Bordeaux, place Amélie-Raba-Léon, Bordeaux cedex, France.

出版信息

Rev Mal Respir. 2011 Feb;28(2):240-53. doi: 10.1016/j.rmr.2010.08.010.

DOI:10.1016/j.rmr.2010.08.010
PMID:21402237
Abstract

The assessment of severity. Severity assessment is a key element in the management of community-acquired pneumonia. This assessment will determine the level of diagnostic workup and treatment, as well as the site of care. Several tools have been developed to help this assessment. The Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) or the CURB-65 can accurately identify patients with a low risk of death who might be considered for outpatient care while those with a high risk of death would be hospitalized. Nevertheless, PSI and CURB-65 are less accurate for identifying patients requiring admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). Different scores, such the American Thoracic Society criteria or the SMART-COP score, were built to predict need for admission to ICU, vasopressors or mechanical ventilation. Each score has its own strengths and weaknesses and physicians must be aware of these limitations. Although, severity assessment tools are useful guides in the management of patients with community acquired pneumonia, clinical judgment must remain decisive.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Where to manage community acquired pneumonia? The assessment of severity].
Rev Mal Respir. 2011 Feb;28(2):240-53. doi: 10.1016/j.rmr.2010.08.010.
2
[Severe community-acquired pneumonia: which score for determining the in-hospital level of care?].
Rev Med Suisse. 2009 Oct 14;5(221):2040-2, 2044.
3
Validation of the Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society criteria to predict severe community-acquired pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae.美国传染病学会/美国胸科学会标准对预测肺炎链球菌所致重症社区获得性肺炎的验证
Am J Emerg Med. 2009 Oct;27(8):968-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.07.037.
4
Can we use severity assessment tools to increase outpatient management of community-acquired pneumonia?我们能否使用严重程度评估工具来增加社区获得性肺炎的门诊管理?
Eur J Intern Med. 2012 Jul;23(5):398-406. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2011.10.002. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
5
Severe community-acquired pneumonia: validation of the Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society guidelines to predict an intensive care unit admission.重症社区获得性肺炎:美国传染病学会/美国胸科学会预测入住重症监护病房指南的验证
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Feb 15;48(4):377-85. doi: 10.1086/596307.
6
Validation and clinical implications of the IDSA/ATS minor criteria for severe community-acquired pneumonia.美国感染病学会/美国胸科学会严重社区获得性肺炎次要标准的验证及临床意义
Thorax. 2009 Jul;64(7):598-603. doi: 10.1136/thx.2009.113795. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
7
A prospective comparison of severity scores for identifying patients with severe community acquired pneumonia: reconsidering what is meant by severe pneumonia.用于识别重症社区获得性肺炎患者的严重程度评分的前瞻性比较:重新审视重症肺炎的定义。
Thorax. 2006 May;61(5):419-24. doi: 10.1136/thx.2005.051326. Epub 2006 Jan 31.
8
[Community-acquired pneumonia].社区获得性肺炎
Arch Bronconeumol. 2010 Oct;46 Suppl 7:26-30. doi: 10.1016/S0300-2896(10)70043-0.
9
Validity of pneumonia severity index and CURB-65 severity scoring systems in community acquired pneumonia in an Indian setting.肺炎严重程度指数和CURB-65严重程度评分系统在印度社区获得性肺炎中的有效性。
Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 2010 Jan-Mar;52(1):9-17.
10
PIRO score for community-acquired pneumonia: a new prediction rule for assessment of severity in intensive care unit patients with community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎的PIRO评分:一种用于评估重症监护病房社区获得性肺炎患者严重程度的新预测规则。
Crit Care Med. 2009 Feb;37(2):456-62. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318194b021.