• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机试验研究球囊式注射器在耵聍(耳屎)清除中的应用:对卫生服务利用的影响。

Randomized trial of bulb syringes for earwax: impact on health service utilization.

机构信息

Research & Development Office, The Surgery, Overton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Ann Fam Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;9(2):110-4. doi: 10.1370/afm.1229.

DOI:10.1370/afm.1229
PMID:21403136
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3056857/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Bulb syringes can be used for the self-clearance of earwax and, in the short term, appear effective. We compared the long-term effectiveness of self-irrigation using a bulb syringe with routine care in United Kingdom (UK) family practice clinics where irrigating ears to remove wax is a common procedure.

METHODS

We assessed the impact on health service utilization as a follow-up to a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial of 237 patients attending 7 UK family practice clinics with symptomatic, occluding earwax who were randomized to an intervention group (ear drops, bulb syringe, instructions on its use and reuse) or a control group (ear drops, then clinic irrigation). After 2 years, a retrospective notes search for earwax-related consultations was carried out. We used an intention-to-treat analysis to assess differences in dichotomous outcomes between groups.

RESULTS

In the 2-year trial follow-up, more control group patients returned with episodes of earwax: 85 of 117 (73%) control vs 70 of 117 (60%) intervention, χ(2)=4.30; P = .038; risk ratio 1.21 (95% CI, 1.01-1.37). The numbers of consultations amounted to 1.15 (control) vs 0.64 (intervention) (incidence rate ratio 1.79; 95% CI, 1.05-3.04, P = .032), ie, a difference of 0.50 consultations, thus saving a consultation on average for every 2 people.

CONCLUSION

For patients who have not already tried bulb syringes, self-irrigation using a bulb syringe significantly reduces subsequent demand for ear irrigation by health professionals. Advocating the initial use of bulb syringes could reduce demand for ear irrigation in family practice clinics.

摘要

目的

球囊式洗耳器可用于自行清除耳垢,且在短期内似乎有效。我们比较了在英国(UK)家庭诊所中使用球囊式洗耳器进行自我冲洗与常规护理的长期效果,在这些诊所中,冲洗耳朵以清除耳垢是一种常见的操作。

方法

我们评估了对健康服务利用的影响,这是对 237 名在 7 家英国家庭诊所就诊的、有症状性、阻塞性耳垢的患者进行的一项单盲、随机、对照试验的随访,这些患者被随机分配到干预组(滴耳液、球囊式洗耳器、使用和重复使用说明)或对照组(滴耳液,然后在诊所冲洗)。2 年后,对与耳垢相关的就诊记录进行了回顾性检索。我们采用意向治疗分析来评估组间二分类结局的差异。

结果

在 2 年的试验随访中,对照组中更多的患者因耳垢问题再次就诊:对照组 117 人中的 85 人(73%)vs 干预组 117 人中的 70 人(60%),χ(2)=4.30;P =.038;风险比 1.21(95%CI,1.01-1.37)。就诊次数为对照组 1.15 次(对照组)vs 干预组 0.64 次(干预组)(发病率比 1.79;95%CI,1.05-3.04,P =.032),即平均每次就诊减少 0.50 次,因此,每 2 人中就有 1 人可避免就诊。

结论

对于尚未尝试过球囊式洗耳器的患者,使用球囊式洗耳器进行自我冲洗可显著减少后续对专业医护人员进行耳部冲洗的需求。提倡最初使用球囊式洗耳器可能会减少家庭诊所中对耳部冲洗的需求。

相似文献

1
Randomized trial of bulb syringes for earwax: impact on health service utilization.随机试验研究球囊式注射器在耵聍(耳屎)清除中的应用:对卫生服务利用的影响。
Ann Fam Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;9(2):110-4. doi: 10.1370/afm.1229.
2
Managing earwax in primary care: efficacy of self-treatment using a bulb syringe.基层医疗中耵聍的处理:使用球囊注射器自我治疗的效果
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Jan;58(546):44-9. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X263811.
3
The safety and effectiveness of different methods of earwax removal: a systematic review and economic evaluation.不同的耳垢清除方法的安全性和有效性:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jun;14(28):1-192. doi: 10.3310/hta14280.
4
Earwax - and the right way to use an ear syringe.耳垢——以及使用耳用注射器的正确方法。
Nurs Times. 1977 Oct 6;73(40):1564-5.
5
A quasi-randomised controlled trial of water as a quick softening agent of persistent earwax in general practice.在全科医疗中,将水作为持续性耵聍快速软化剂的一项半随机对照试验。
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Aug;51(469):635-7.
6
Prevention of cerumen impaction by treatment of ear canal skin. A pilot randomized controlled study.通过治疗耳道皮肤预防耵聍栓塞。一项初步随机对照研究。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2005 Apr;30(2):112-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00952.x.
7
Magnitude of impacted earwax in Oman, its impact on hearing impairment and economic burden of earwax on health services.阿曼耵聍嵌塞的程度、其对听力损害的影响以及耵聍对卫生服务造成的经济负担。
Indian J Med Sci. 2007 May;61(5):278-85.
8
Earwax.耳垢
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Apr;58(549):284. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X279995.
9
Clinical Practice Guideline (Update): Earwax (Cerumen Impaction).临床实践指南(更新版):耵聍(耵聍栓塞)
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jan;156(1_suppl):S1-S29. doi: 10.1177/0194599816671491.
10
A non-randomized comparison of earwax removal with a 'do-it-yourself' ear vacuum kit and a Jobson-Horne probe.使用“自己动手”耳部真空套件和乔布森-霍恩探针清除耳垢的非随机比较。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2005 Aug;30(4):320-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2005.01020.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Cerumen Management: An Updated Clinical Review and Evidence-Based Approach for Primary Care Physicians.耳垢管理:初级保健医生的最新临床综述和循证方法。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720904181. doi: 10.1177/2150132720904181.
2
PURLs: Ear wax removal: help patients help themselves.永久资源链接:耳部耵聍清除:帮助患者自助。
J Fam Pract. 2011 Nov;60(11):671-3.
3
In this issue: Back to basics: talking, listening, and low-tech primary care.本期内容:回归基础:交谈、倾听与低技术含量的初级医疗保健。
Ann Fam Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;9(2):98-100. doi: 10.1370/afm.1233.

本文引用的文献

1
The safety and effectiveness of different methods of earwax removal: a systematic review and economic evaluation.不同的耳垢清除方法的安全性和有效性:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jun;14(28):1-192. doi: 10.3310/hta14280.
2
Ear drops for the removal of ear wax.用于清除耳垢的滴耳剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21(1):CD004326. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004326.pub2.
3
Clinical practice guideline: cerumen impaction.临床实践指南:耵聍栓塞
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Sep;139(3 Suppl 2):S1-S21. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.06.026.
4
Managing earwax in primary care: efficacy of self-treatment using a bulb syringe.基层医疗中耵聍的处理:使用球囊注射器自我治疗的效果
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Jan;58(546):44-9. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X263811.
5
Impacted cerumen: composition, production, epidemiology and management.耵聍栓塞:成分、产生、流行病学及处理
QJM. 2004 Aug;97(8):477-88. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hch082.
6
Management of earwax in primary care--postal survey of UK GPs and practice nurses.基层医疗中耵聍的管理——英国全科医生和执业护士的邮政调查
Fam Pract. 2004 Aug;21(4):413-4. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh410.
7
When not to syringe an ear.何时不宜给耳朵进行灌洗
N Z Med J. 1998 Nov 13;111(1077):422-4.
8
What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes.相对风险是什么?一种在常见结局队列研究中校正优势比的方法。
JAMA. 1998 Nov 18;280(19):1690-1. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.19.1690.
9
Cerumen removal--current challenges.耵聍清除——当前面临的挑战。
Ear Nose Throat J. 1998 Jul;77(7):541-6, 548.
10
Ear wax removal: a survey of current practice.耵聍清除:当前实践调查
BMJ. 1990 Dec 1;301(6763):1251-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6763.1251.