Haddad Helene J, Salameh Ziad, Sadig Walid, Aboushelib Moustafa, Jakstat Holger A
Prosthodontic Department, Dental School, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Eur J Esthet Dent. 2011 Spring;6(1):94-102.
To determine the color space and the coverage error of two manual shade guide systems in four age groups of a selected population.
A total of 174 patients were divided into four age groups and the shade of their natural teeth was measured (2067 teeth) with a spectrophotometer (Vita Easyshade). Color parameters in terms of L*, a*, b* values, chroma, and hue were recorded for each tooth. Color difference (ΔEmin) between each natural tooth and the closest match using two manual shade guide systems were calculated (3D Master shade guide standard and 3D Master shade guide with intermediate values). A Wilcoxon test was used to assess statistical differences between mean ΔEmin values for each system (α = 0.05).
The recoded ΔE of the two tested manual systems was 6.19 for 3D Master shade guide (standard) and 6.02 for 3D Master shade guide (intermediate values). A statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) was found between the mean ΔEmin of the two systems. 47% of natural teeth presented a best match with intermediate value and chroma shade tabs. The mean ΔEmin was influenced by the age group of the patients (5.15, 5.23, 6.58, and 6.69, respectively).
Using intermediate value and chroma did not improve shade match, nor the coverage error of the tested population. Nevertheless, better coverage error was observed in younger age groups compared to older anterior teeth.
确定选定人群中四个年龄组的两种手动比色板系统的色彩空间和覆盖误差。
共174例患者被分为四个年龄组,用分光光度计(维他易美)测量其天然牙的颜色(2067颗牙齿)。记录每颗牙齿的L*、a*、b值、色度和色调等颜色参数。计算每颗天然牙与使用两种手动比色板系统(3D大师标准比色板和含中间值的3D大师比色板)最接近匹配颜色之间的色差(ΔEmin)。采用Wilcoxon检验评估每个系统平均ΔE*min值之间的统计学差异(α = 0.05)。
两种测试的手动系统记录的ΔE值,3D大师标准比色板为6.19,3D大师含中间值比色板为6.02。两个系统的平均ΔEmin之间存在统计学显著差异(P < 0.001)。47%的天然牙与中间值和色度色片最匹配。平均ΔEmin受患者年龄组影响(分别为5.15、5.23、6.58和6.69)。
使用中间值和色度并不能改善比色匹配,也不能改善测试人群的覆盖误差。然而,与老年前牙相比,在年轻年龄组中观察到更好的覆盖误差。