Safir Oral Care Center, Konya, Turkey.
J Adhes Dent. 2011 Feb;13(1):31-7. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a18514.
This study compared microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of six simplified adhesive systems and an etch-andrinse, one-bottle adhesive system to intact enamel.
Twenty-eight sound incisor teeth were cut at the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) under water cooling. The enamel surfaces were cleaned with pumice, randomly assigned to seven groups and treated with one of the following adhesives: Hybrid Bond (Sun Medical); AdheSE One (Ivoclar/Vivadent); One Coat 7.0 (Coltene/Whaledent); Danville Experimental (Danville Materials); Clearfil S3 Bond (Kuraray); G Bond (GC); and Prelude Total-etch (Danville Materials) as control. Composite resin (Clearfil AP-X, Kuraray) buildups were created and after 24 h, the teeth were sectioned into beams of 1.0 mm2 cross-sectional area. Each beam was tested in a microtensile tester (Bisco) at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Data were calculated as MPa and analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Multiple comparisons were done using the Tukey test.
μTBS values of adhesives to intact enamel were as follows (mean ± SD; different letters indicate statistically different groups, p < 0.05): Hybrid Bond: 15.62 ± 3.90a; AdheSE One: 17.29 ± 3.88ab; One Coat 7.0: 19.59 ± 3.95abc; Danville Experimental: 18.65 ± 5.33abc; Clearfil S3 Bond:20.89 ± 2.96bcd; G Bond: 23.49 ± 4.21cd; Prelude Totaletch: 25.79 ± 5.24d.
Clearfil S3 Bond and G Bond showed bond strength similar to Prelude Total-etch (p = 0.064). The other simplified adhesives showed a similar performance (p = 0.239), however, μTBS values to intact enamel of these systems were lower than those obtained by Prelude Total-etch (p < 0.05).
本研究比较了六种简化型粘接剂系统和一种酸蚀-自酸蚀单瓶粘接剂系统与完整牙釉质的微拉伸粘接强度（μTBS）。
28 颗健康切牙在水冷却下于牙釉牙骨质界（CEJ）处切割。釉质表面用浮石清洁，随机分为 7 组，用以下一种粘接剂处理：Hybrid Bond（松风）；AdheSE One（义获嘉）；One Coat 7.0（科尔泰尼）；Danville Experimental（丹特力）；Clearfil S3 Bond（可乐丽）；G Bond（GC）；Prelude Total-etch（丹特力）作为对照组。复合树脂（可乐丽 Clearfil AP-X）堆积后，24 小时后将牙齿切成 1.0mm2 截面积的梁。每个梁在微拉伸试验机（必适）上以 1mm/min 的十字头速度进行测试。数据以 MPa 计算，并进行单因素方差分析。采用 Tukey 检验进行多重比较。
完整牙釉质的粘接剂的 μTBS 值如下（平均值±SD；不同字母表示统计学上有差异的组，p<0.05）：Hybrid Bond：15.62±3.90a；AdheSE One：17.29±3.88ab；One Coat 7.0：19.59±3.95abc；Danville Experimental：18.65±5.33abc；Clearfil S3 Bond：20.89±2.96bcd；G Bond：23.49±4.21cd；Prelude Total-etch：25.79±5.24d。
Clearfil S3 Bond 和 G Bond 的粘接强度与 Prelude Total-etch 相似（p=0.064）。其他简化粘接剂的性能相似（p=0.239），但这些系统对完整牙釉质的 μTBS 值低于 Prelude Total-etch（p<0.05）。
