Department Of Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Aug;26(8):894-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1662-4. Epub 2011 Mar 15.
While victims of intimate partner violence (IPV) present to health care settings for a variety of complaints; rates and predictors of case identification and intervention are unknown.
Examine emergency department (ED) case finding and response within a known population of abused women.
Retrospective longitudinal cohort study.
Police-involved female victims of IPV in a semi-rural Midwestern county.
We linked police, prosecutor, and medical record data to examine characteristics of ED identification and response from 1999-2002; bivariate analyses and logistic regression analyses accounted for the nesting of subjects' with multiple visits.
IPV victims (N = 993) generated 3,426 IPV-related police incidents (mean 3.61, median 3, range 1-17) over the 4-year study period; 785 (79%) generated 4,306 ED visits (mean 7.17, median 5, range 1-87), which occurred after the date of a documented IPV assault. Only 384 (9%) ED visits occurred within a week of a police-reported IPV incident. IPV identification in the ED was associated with higher violence severity, being childless and underinsured, more police incidents (mean: 4.2 vs 3.3), and more ED visits (mean: 10.6 vs 5.5) over the 4 years. The majority of ED visits occurring after a documented IPV incident were for medical complaints (3,378, 78.4%), and 72% of this cohort were never identified as victims of abuse. IPV identification was associated with the day of a police incident, transportation by police, self-disclosure of "domestic assault," and chart documentation of mental health and substance abuse issues. When IPV was identified, ED staff provided legally useful documentation (86%), police contact (50%), and social worker involvement (45%), but only assessed safety in 33% of the women and referred them to victim services 25% of the time.
The majority of police-identified IPV victims frequently use the ED for health care, but are unlikely to be identified or receive any intervention in that setting.
尽管亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的受害者因各种投诉前往医疗保健机构就诊;但目前尚不清楚病例识别和干预的发生率和预测因素。
在已知的受虐妇女群体中,研究急诊科(ED)的病例发现和反应情况。
回顾性纵向队列研究。
在中西部半农村县,涉及警方介入的 IPV 女性受害者。
我们将警方、检察官和医疗记录数据进行了关联,以在 1999 年至 2002 年间检查 ED 鉴定和反应的特征;采用双变量分析和逻辑回归分析,考虑了受试者多次就诊的嵌套情况。
在 4 年的研究期间,993 名 IPV 受害者共产生 3426 起与 IPV 相关的警方事件(平均 3.61 次,中位数 3 次,范围 1-17 次);其中 785 人(79%)产生了 4306 次 ED 就诊(平均 7.17 次,中位数 5 次,范围 1-87 次),这些就诊都发生在有记录的 IPV 袭击日期之后。只有 384 次(9%)ED 就诊发生在警方报告的 IPV 事件后的一周内。ED 中 IPV 的识别与更高的暴力严重程度、无子女和保险不足、更多的警方事件(平均:4.2 次与 3.3 次)和更多的 ED 就诊(平均:10.6 次与 5.5 次)有关,这些事件发生在 4 年中。在有记录的 IPV 事件后发生的大多数 ED 就诊都是医疗投诉(3378 次,78.4%),该队列中 72%的人从未被认定为虐待受害者。IPV 的识别与警方事件发生的当天、警方护送、自我披露“家庭虐待”以及心理健康和药物滥用问题的图表记录有关。当 IPV 被识别时,ED 工作人员提供了具有法律意义的文件(86%)、警方联系(50%)和社工介入(45%),但仅对 33%的女性评估了安全性,只有 25%的时间将她们转介给受害者服务机构。
大多数被警方认定的 IPV 受害者经常因医疗保健而使用 ED,但他们不太可能在该环境中被识别或接受任何干预。