Rhodes Karin V, Frankel Richard M, Levinthal Naomi, Prenoveau Elizabeth, Bailey Jeannine, Levinson Wendy
Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Social Policy & Practice, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Nov 6;147(9):620-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-9-200711060-00006.
Women who are victims of domestic violence frequently seek care in an emergency department. However, it is challenging to hold sensitive conversations in this environment.
To describe communication about domestic violence between emergency providers and female patients.
Analysis of audiotapes made during a randomized, controlled trial of computerized screening for domestic violence.
2 socioeconomically diverse emergency departments: one urban and academic, the other suburban and community-based.
1281 English-speaking women age 16 to 69 years and 80 providers (30 attending physicians, 46 residents, and 4 nurse practitioners).
871 audiotapes, including 293 that included provider screening for domestic violence, were analyzed. Providers typically asked about domestic violence in a perfunctory manner during the social history. Provider communication behaviors associated with women disclosing abuse included probing (defined as asking > or =1 additional topically related question), providing open-ended opportunities to talk, and being generally responsive to patient clues (any mention of a psychosocial issue). Chart documentation of domestic violence was present in one third of cases.
Nonverbal communication was not examined. Providers were aware that they were being audiotaped and may have tried to perform their best.
Although hectic clinical environments present many obstacles to meaningful discussions about domestic violence, several provider communication behaviors seemed to facilitate patient disclosure of experiences with abuse. Illustrative examples highlight common pitfalls and exemplary practices in screening for abuse and response to disclosures of abuse.
遭受家庭暴力的女性经常在急诊科寻求治疗。然而,在这种环境下进行敏感对话具有挑战性。
描述急诊科医护人员与女性患者之间关于家庭暴力的沟通情况。
对一项关于家庭暴力计算机筛查的随机对照试验期间录制的录音带进行分析。
两个社会经济背景不同的急诊科:一个是城市学术型,另一个是郊区社区型。
1281名年龄在16至69岁之间的讲英语的女性以及80名医护人员(30名主治医师、46名住院医师和4名执业护士)。
分析了871份录音带,其中包括293份涉及医护人员对家庭暴力进行筛查的录音带。医护人员在社会史询问过程中通常以敷衍的方式询问家庭暴力情况。与女性披露虐待行为相关的医护人员沟通行为包括追问(定义为额外提出≥1个主题相关问题)、提供开放式谈话机会以及对患者线索(任何提及的心理社会问题)做出总体回应。三分之一的病例中有家庭暴力的病历记录。
未检查非语言沟通。医护人员知道自己正在被录音,可能会尽力表现。
尽管忙碌的临床环境给关于家庭暴力的有意义讨论带来了许多障碍,但一些医护人员的沟通行为似乎有助于患者披露虐待经历。示例突出了在筛查虐待行为和对虐待披露做出回应方面的常见陷阱和 exemplary practices。 (注:“exemplary practices”疑有误,可能是“exemplary practices”应改为“exemplary practices”,但未明确具体正确表述,暂保留原文。)