Suppr超能文献

预防丙泊酚注射痛的措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Prevention of pain on injection of propofol: systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, 94115 CA, USA.

出版信息

BMJ. 2011 Mar 15;342:d1110. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1110.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically determine the most efficacious approach for preventing pain on injection of propofol.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, www.clinicaltrials.gov, and hand searching from the reference lists of identified papers.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomised controlled trials comparing drug and non-drug interventions with placebo or another intervention to alleviate pain on injection of propofol in adults.

RESULTS

Data were analysed from 177 randomised controlled trials totalling 25,260 adults. The overall risk of pain from propofol injection alone was about 60%. Using an antecubital vein instead of a hand vein was the most effective single intervention (relative risk 0.14, 95% confidence interval 0.07 to 0.30). Pretreatment using lidocaine (lignocaine) in conjunction with venous occlusion was similarly effective (0.29, 0.22 to 0.38). Other effective interventions were a lidocaine-propofol admixture (0.40, 0.33 to 0.48); pretreatment with lidocaine (0.47, 0.40 to 0.56), opioids (0.49, 0.41 to 0.59), ketamine (0.52, 0.46 to 0.57), or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (0.67, 0.49 to 0.91); and propofol emulsions containing medium and long chain triglycerides (0.75, 0.67 to 0.84). Statistical testing of indirect comparisons showed that use of the antecubital vein and pretreatment using lidocaine along with venous occlusion to be more efficacious than the other interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

The two most efficacious interventions to reduce pain on injection of propofol were use of the antecubital vein, or pretreatment using lidocaine in conjunction with venous occlusion when the hand vein was chosen. Under the assumption of independent efficacy a third practical alternative could be pretreatment of the hand vein with lidocaine or ketamine and use of a propofol emulsion containing medium and long chain triglycerides. Although not the most effective intervention on its own, a small dose of opioids before induction halved the risk of pain from the injection and thus can generally be recommended unless contraindicated.

摘要

目的

系统评估预防丙泊酚注射痛的最有效方法。

设计

系统评价和荟萃分析。

资料来源

PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、www.clinicaltrials.gov 以及从已确定文献的参考文献中手动检索。

研究选择

比较药物和非药物干预与安慰剂或其他干预措施以减轻成人丙泊酚注射痛的随机对照试验。

结果

对来自 177 项随机对照试验的 25260 名成年人的数据进行了分析。单独使用丙泊酚注射引起疼痛的总体风险约为 60%。使用前臂静脉而非手部静脉是最有效的单一干预措施(相对风险 0.14,95%置信区间 0.07 至 0.30)。预先使用利多卡因(lignocaine)联合静脉闭塞同样有效(0.29,0.22 至 0.38)。其他有效干预措施包括利多卡因-丙泊酚混合物(0.40,0.33 至 0.48);预先使用利多卡因(0.47,0.40 至 0.56)、阿片类药物(0.49,0.41 至 0.59)、氯胺酮(0.52,0.46 至 0.57)或非甾体抗炎药(0.67,0.49 至 0.91);以及含有中链和长链甘油三酯的丙泊酚乳剂(0.75,0.67 至 0.84)。间接比较的统计学检验表明,使用前臂静脉和预先使用利多卡因联合静脉闭塞比其他干预措施更有效。

结论

减少丙泊酚注射痛的两种最有效的干预措施是在手选手部静脉时使用前臂静脉或预先使用利多卡因联合静脉闭塞。假设独立疗效,另一种实用的替代方案可以是在手静脉预先使用利多卡因或氯胺酮,并使用含有中链和长链甘油三酯的丙泊酚乳剂。尽管单独使用不是最有效的干预措施,但诱导前小剂量使用阿片类药物可使注射痛的风险减半,因此一般可以推荐使用,除非有禁忌证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验