Suppr超能文献

加强遗传风险预测研究报告:GRIPS 声明。

Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies: the GRIPS statement.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2011 Aug;19(8):833-6. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.25. Epub 2011 Mar 16.

Abstract

The rapid and continuing progress in gene discovery for complex diseases is fueling interest in the potential application of genetic risk models for clinical and public health practice. The number of studies assessing the predictive ability is steadily increasing, but the quality and completeness of reporting varies. A multidisciplinary workshop sponsored by the Human Genome Epidemiology Network developed a checklist of 25 items recommended for strengthening the reporting of Genetic RIsk Prediction Studies, building on the principles established by previous reporting guidelines. These recommendations aim to enhance the transparency of study reporting, and thereby to improve the synthesis and application of information from multiple studies that might differ in design, conduct, or analysis. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published on the EJHG website.

摘要

基因发现技术在复杂疾病领域的快速持续进步,激发了人们对于遗传风险模型在临床和公共卫生实践中潜在应用的兴趣。评估预测能力的研究数量在稳步增加,但报告的质量和完整性却存在差异。人类基因组流行病学网络(HuGE)组织的一次多学科研讨会,基于先前报告准则所确立的原则,提出了一份 25 项项目的清单,以加强遗传风险预测研究的报告。这些建议旨在提高研究报告的透明度,从而促进对可能在设计、实施或分析方面存在差异的多项研究信息的综合和应用。详细的解释和说明文件发布在 EJHG 网站上。

相似文献

1
Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies: the GRIPS statement.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2011 Aug;19(8):833-6. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.25. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
3
Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies: the GRIPS statement.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;26(4):255-9. doi: 10.1007/s10654-011-9552-y.
4
Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies: the GRIPS statement.
Eur J Clin Invest. 2011 Sep;41(9):1004-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2011.02494.x. Epub 2011 Mar 15.
5
Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies (GRIPS): explanation and elaboration.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2011 May;19(5):18 p preceding 494. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.27.
6
Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies (GRIPS): explanation and elaboration.
Eur J Clin Invest. 2011 Sep;41(9):1010-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2011.02493.x. Epub 2011 Mar 15.
7
Strengthening the reporting of Genetic RIsk Prediction Studies (GRIPS): explanation and elaboration.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Aug;64(8):e1-e22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.02.003. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
8
Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies (GRIPS): explanation and elaboration.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;26(4):313-37. doi: 10.1007/s10654-011-9551-z.
9
STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association studies (STREGA)--an extension of the STROBE statement.
Eur J Clin Invest. 2009 Apr;39(4):247-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02125.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving reporting standards for phenotyping algorithm in biomedical research: 5 fundamental dimensions.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Apr 3;31(4):1036-1041. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae005.
4
The perspective from EASAC and FEAM on direct-to-consumer genetic testing for health-related purposes.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2013 Jul;21(7):703-7. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.238. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
5
Next steps in cardiovascular disease genomic research--sequencing, epigenetics, and transcriptomics.
Clin Chem. 2012 Jan;58(1):113-26. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.170423. Epub 2011 Nov 18.
6
PredictABEL: an R package for the assessment of risk prediction models.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;26(4):261-4. doi: 10.1007/s10654-011-9567-4. Epub 2011 Mar 24.

本文引用的文献

1
The emergence of translational epidemiology: from scientific discovery to population health impact.
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Sep 1;172(5):517-24. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq211. Epub 2010 Aug 5.
2
Assessment of improved prediction beyond traditional risk factors: when does a difference make a difference?
Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2010 Feb;3(1):3-5. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.110.938092.
3
A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research.
Eur J Clin Invest. 2010 Jan;40(1):35-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02234.x.
4
Assessment of claims of improved prediction beyond the Framingham risk score.
JAMA. 2009 Dec 2;302(21):2345-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1757.
7
Criteria for evaluation of novel markers of cardiovascular risk: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.
Circulation. 2009 May 5;119(17):2408-16. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192278. Epub 2009 Apr 13.
10
STREGA, STROBE, STARD, SQUIRE, MOOSE, PRISMA, GNOSIS, TREND, ORION, COREQ, QUOROM, REMARK... and CONSORT: for whom does the guideline toll?
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Jun;62(6):594-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.12.003. Epub 2009 Jan 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验