DEBASISH BASU, MD., DNB., Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Drug De-addiction and Treatment Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh-160012
Indian J Psychiatry. 2000 Oct;42(4):378-86.
Substance use disorders have undergone major changes in both the international (ICD-10) and American (DSM-IV) nosological systems, thus necessitating a study of cross-system agreement between ICD-10 and DSM-IV substance dependence, especially from a developing country setting. Further, endorsement rates for various substance dependence criteria in the two systems need to be studied from a similar perspective. Hence, 221 consecutive patients with 279 diagnostic categories of substance dependence attending a de-addiction centre in Northern India were studied with regard to endorsement of the various ICD-10 and DSM-IV criteria as well as for cross-system agreement for severity of dependence. High endorsement rates were seen for most criteria in both the systems, except for those related to 'persistence despite harm' and 'salience (neglect of various activities, plus excessive time spent to procure the substance)'. There were some significant differences, however, between endorsement rates across different substance categories in both the systems. Cross-system agreement on severity of substance dependence ranged from fair to good for all categories combined, and was good to excellent for the opioid category. The category of 'others' (nicotine, cannabis and sedative-hypnotics) showed poor cross-system agreement Overall, the results lend support to the basic theoretical construct behind both ICD-10 and DSM-IV substance dependence syndrome from a developing country perspective.
物质使用障碍在国际疾病分类(ICD-10)和美国精神障碍诊断与统计手册(DSM-IV)这两种分类系统中都发生了重大变化,因此需要研究 ICD-10 和 DSM-IV 物质依赖之间的跨系统一致性,尤其是在发展中国家的背景下。此外,还需要从类似的角度研究两种系统中各种物质依赖标准的认可率。因此,研究了在印度北部一家戒毒中心就诊的 221 名连续患者,共 279 种物质依赖的诊断类别,研究了他们对 ICD-10 和 DSM-IV 各种标准的认可情况,以及对依赖严重程度的跨系统一致性。两种系统中,大多数标准的认可率都很高,除了那些与“尽管有伤害但仍持续”和“显著(忽视各种活动,加上花大量时间获取物质)”相关的标准外。然而,两种系统中不同物质类别之间的认可率存在一些显著差异。所有类别合并后的物质依赖严重程度的跨系统一致性从良好到优秀不等,而阿片类物质的跨系统一致性为优秀到极好。“其他”类别(尼古丁、大麻和镇静催眠药)的跨系统一致性较差。总的来说,这些结果从发展中国家的角度为 ICD-10 和 DSM-IV 物质依赖综合征的基本理论结构提供了支持。