Chair Sek Y, Lee Chui K, Choi Kai C, Sears Samuel F
The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Jul;34(7):858-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03048.x. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
Patient-centered outcomes for Chinese implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients have not been previously studied. This study examined health-related quality of life (HRQL) and its relation with ICD shock-related anxiety, ICD shock, patient acceptance of the ICD, and demographic and clinical characteristics among a sample of Chinese ICD patients.
Eighty-five ICD recipients completed the Chinese versions of the Short Form (SF-12) Health Survey, Florida Patient Acceptance Survey (FPAS), and Florida Shock Anxiety Scale (FSAS), and a demographic sheet during their follow-up visit.
The mean scores of physical component summary and mental component summary (MCS) of ICD patients (41.7 and 46.6, respectively) were lower than the Hong Kong Chinese normative data. As expected, MCS was negatively correlated with shock anxiety (r =-0.38, P < 0.01) and positively correlated with patient acceptance (r = 0.50, P < 0.01). Shock anxiety was negatively correlated with patient acceptance of the ICD (r =-0.58, P < 0.01). Age was positively associated with FPAS (r = 0.55, P = 0.014) while negatively related with FSAS (r =-0.28, P = 0.003). The experience of ICD shock (yes/no) was not associated with any differences but shock frequency groups (no shocks, 1-2 shocks, and ≥3) and gender were significantly different on shock anxiety but not on general mental functioning.
Higher ICD shock anxiety was associated with lower HRQL and lower ICD acceptance. Age, female, and clinical characteristics such as diabetes, coronary heart disease, and ICD shock experience can influence patient-centric outcomes of HRQL, FPAS, and FSAS. These results extend the evidence for increased clinical attention in Chinese patients to specific outcomes such as shock anxiety and its impact on HRQL.
此前尚未对中国植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)患者以患者为中心的结局进行研究。本研究调查了中国ICD患者样本的健康相关生活质量(HRQL)及其与ICD电击相关焦虑、ICD电击、患者对ICD的接受度以及人口统计学和临床特征之间的关系。
85名ICD接受者在随访期间完成了中文版的简明健康调查(SF-12)、佛罗里达患者接受度调查(FPAS)和佛罗里达电击焦虑量表(FSAS),以及一份人口统计表格。
ICD患者的身体成分总结和心理成分总结(MCS)的平均得分(分别为41.7和46.6)低于中国香港的正常数据。正如预期的那样,MCS与电击焦虑呈负相关(r = -0.38,P < 0.01),与患者接受度呈正相关(r = 0.50,P < 0.01)。电击焦虑与患者对ICD的接受度呈负相关(r = -0.58,P < 0.01)。年龄与FPAS呈正相关(r = 0.55,P = 0.014),而与FSAS呈负相关(r = -