Ford Jessica, Finch John F, Woodrow Lawrence K, Cutitta Katherine E, Shea Julie, Fischer Avi, Hazelton Garrett, Sears Samuel F
Department of Psychology, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Sep;35(9):1146-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03455.x. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) reduces mortality in patients at risk for life-threatening arrhythmias via high energy shock. The Florida Shock Anxiety Scale (FSAS) was developed to measure ICD patient shock-related anxiety. Initial psychometric evaluation revealed good reliability and validity. The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometrics of the FSAS in a large US sample of ICD patients.
Participants were recruited via e-mail and the survey was completed online. Ultimately, 443 ICD patients (359 male and 421 White) completed the 10-item FSAS.
Means for FSAS were comparable to previously published data (M = 15.18, SD = 6.5). Interitem reliability was good (Cronbach's α= 0.89). The FSAS was negatively correlated with single-item measures of emotional well-being (r =-0.378, P < 0.01), sense of security (r =-0.365, P < 0.01), perceived general health (r =-0.185, P < 0.01), and quality of life (r =-0.216, P < .01), demonstrating discriminant validity. Convergent validity was supported through significant correlations with number of shocks (r = 0.464, P < 0.01) and reported disruptiveness of shock (r = 0.484, P < 0.01). Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that a single (second-order) factor model (χ(2) [34] = 75.34, P < 0.05, comparative fit index = 0.98, root mean-square error of approximation = 0.05) had the best fit.
Shock anxiety as a construct can be measured in a reliable and valid method by the FSAS. These nationally representative data suggest that a single score for shock anxiety is an easy to use and appropriate method of assessment.
植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)通过高能电击降低有危及生命心律失常风险患者的死亡率。佛罗里达电击焦虑量表(FSAS)用于测量ICD患者与电击相关的焦虑。初步心理测量学评估显示其具有良好的信度和效度。本研究旨在在美国大量ICD患者样本中检验FSAS的心理测量学特性。
通过电子邮件招募参与者,调查在线完成。最终,443名ICD患者(359名男性,421名白人)完成了10项FSAS。
FSAS的均值与先前发表的数据相当(M = 15.18,标准差 = 6.5)。项目间信度良好(克朗巴哈α系数 = 0.89)。FSAS与情绪幸福感单项测量(r = -0.378,P < 0.01)、安全感(r = -0.365,P < 0.01)、感知总体健康状况(r = -0.185,P < 0.01)和生活质量(r = -0.216,P < 0.01)呈负相关,表明具有区分效度。通过与电击次数(r = 0.464,P < 0.01)和报告的电击干扰性(r = 0.484,P < 0.01)的显著相关性支持了聚合效度。验证性因素分析表明单一(二阶)因素模型(χ(2) [34] = 75.34,P < 0.05,比较拟合指数 = 0.98,近似均方根误差 = 0.05)拟合最佳。
FSAS能够以可靠有效的方法测量电击焦虑这一构念。这些具有全国代表性的数据表明,电击焦虑的单一分数是一种易于使用且合适的评估方法。