Instituto do Coração (InCor) - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo,São Paulo, SP - Brasil.
Universidade de São Paulo - Escola de Artes, Ciências e Humanidades, São Paulo, SP - Brasil.
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020 Jun 1;114(5):764-772. doi: 10.36660/abc.20190255.
In spite of proven effectiveness of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), shock therapy delivered by the device may result in increased levels of anxiety and depression, leading to deleterious effects on quality of life.
To carry out the translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Florida Shock Anxiety Scale (FSAS) scale into Brazilian Portuguese.
In this psychometric study, construct validity was performed by exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory (CFA) factor analyses, and by item response theory (IRT). The adjustment indexes of the CFA were: Robust Mean-Scaled Chi Square/df NNFI, CFI (Comparative Fit Index), GFI (Goodness Fit Index), AGFI (Adjusted Goodness Fit Index), RMSEA (Root Mean Square Error of Approximation) and RMSR (Root Mean Square of Residuals). Reliability was evaluated through Cronbach's Alpha, McDonald's Omega and Greatest Lower Bound (GLB). The analyses were carried out with the programs SPSS 23 and Factor 10.8.01. A 5 percent significance level was used.
The final Portuguese version of the FSAS was administered to 151 ICD patients, with a mean age of 55.7 ± 14.1 years, and predominantly male. The parallel analysis indicated that the FSAS is unidimensional, with an explained variance of 64.4%. The correlations ranged from 0.31 to 0.77, factor loadings from 0.67 to 0.86, and communalities from 0.46 to 0.74. The adjustment indexes of the CFA were above the quality threshold. Satisfactory reliability evidence was provided by the FSAS.
The FSAS-Br showed consistent validity and reliability evidence. Therefore, it can be used in ICD patients in Brazil. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020; 114(5):764-772).
尽管植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)已被证实有效,但该设备所提供的电击治疗可能会导致焦虑和抑郁水平升高,从而对生活质量产生有害影响。
将佛罗里达电击焦虑量表(FSAS)翻译成巴西葡萄牙语,并进行跨文化调适和验证。
在这项心理测量学研究中,通过探索性(EFA)和验证性(CFA)因子分析以及项目反应理论(IRT)进行了结构有效性评估。CFA 的调整指标包括:稳健平均比例卡方/df NNFI、CFI(比较拟合指数)、GFI(良好拟合指数)、AGFI(调整良好拟合指数)、RMSEA(近似均方根误差)和 RMSR(残差均方根)。可靠性通过 Cronbach's Alpha、McDonald's Omega 和 Greatest Lower Bound(GLB)进行评估。分析使用 SPSS 23 和 Factor 10.8.01 程序进行。使用 5%的显著水平。
最终的 FSAS 葡萄牙语版本应用于 151 名 ICD 患者,平均年龄为 55.7±14.1 岁,主要为男性。平行分析表明,FSAS 是单维的,解释方差为 64.4%。相关性范围为 0.31 至 0.77,因子负荷为 0.67 至 0.86,共性为 0.46 至 0.74。CFA 的调整指标高于质量阈值。FSAS 提供了令人满意的可靠性证据。
FSAS-Br 表现出一致的有效性和可靠性证据。因此,它可以在巴西的 ICD 患者中使用。(Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020; 114(5):764-772)。