Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.
Sexually Transmitted Infections Research Centre, University of Sydney, Marian Villa, Westmead Hospital, NSW 2145, Australia.
J Med Microbiol. 2011 Jul;60(Pt 7):1010-1016. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.029108-0. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
This study used a previously described multiplex PCR-based reverse line blot (mPCR/RLB) assay to assess the prevalence and distribution of 14 urogenital pathogens or putative pathogens, namely Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma genitalium, Mycoplasma hominis, Trichomonas vaginalis, Gardnerella vaginalis, Ureaplasma parvum, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2, and human adenovirus. First-voided urine specimens and endocervical and self-collected vaginal swabs from each of 216 women attending three sexual health clinics in Sydney, Australia, were tested and the results were compared with those of reference methods for each organism. One hundred and sixty-eight women (77.7 %) had at least one and 105 (48.6 %) had more than one target organism, most commonly G. vaginalis and Ureaplasma spp. The prevalence of each of the four known sexually transmissible pathogens was <5 %. Of the 216 women, 111 (51.4 %) reported at least one symptom consistent with genital or urethral infection, including discharge, pain or discomfort. Only G. vaginalis was detected more frequently in women with symptoms (P = 0.05). The specificity of the mPCR/RLB assay compared with that of the reference methods for each organism and for all specimen types was 100 %. The mean sensitivities of the mPCR/RLB assay compared with those of the reference methods for self-collected vaginal swabs, cervical swabs and first-voided urine specimens for all organisms were 99.3, 98.1 and 84.6 %, respectively; however, these differences were not significant. There were no differences in sensitivities between specimen types for C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, T. vaginalis and H. influenzae, although all were found infrequently. Overall, the mPCR/RLB platform was found to be an accurate testing platform in a sexual health clinic setting.
本研究采用先前描述的基于多重 PCR 的反向线印迹(mPCR/RLB)检测方法,评估了 14 种泌尿生殖道病原体或疑似病原体的流行情况和分布,包括淋病奈瑟菌、沙眼衣原体、生殖支原体、人型支原体、阴道毛滴虫、阴道加德纳菌、解脲脲原体、人型支原体、脑膜炎奈瑟菌、肺炎链球菌、流感嗜血杆菌、单纯疱疹病毒 1 型和 2 型以及人腺病毒。对来自澳大利亚悉尼三家性健康诊所的 216 名女性的首次排空尿液标本和宫颈内及自我采集的阴道拭子进行了检测,并将结果与每种病原体的参考方法进行了比较。168 名女性(77.7%)至少有一种目标病原体,105 名女性(48.6%)有多种目标病原体,最常见的是阴道加德纳菌和脲原体。四种已知的性传播病原体的患病率均<5%。在 216 名女性中,111 名(51.4%)报告至少有一种与生殖器或尿道感染一致的症状,包括分泌物、疼痛或不适。只有阴道加德纳菌在有症状的女性中检测到的频率更高(P=0.05)。mPCR/RLB 检测方法与每种病原体和所有标本类型的参考方法相比,特异性均为 100%。mPCR/RLB 检测方法与参考方法相比,对自我采集的阴道拭子、宫颈拭子和首次排空尿液标本中所有病原体的平均灵敏度分别为 99.3%、98.1%和 84.6%;然而,这些差异无统计学意义。对于沙眼衣原体、淋病奈瑟菌、阴道毛滴虫和流感嗜血杆菌,标本类型之间的灵敏度无差异,尽管这些病原体均很少见。总体而言,mPCR/RLB 平台在性健康诊所环境中被证明是一种准确的检测平台。