Suppr超能文献

在常规临床医院环境中通过半定量检测尿路病原体进行尿路感染的分子诊断

Molecular Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections by Semi-Quantitative Detection of Uropathogens in a Routine Clinical Hospital Setting.

作者信息

van der Zee Anneke, Roorda Lieuwe, Bosman Gerda, Ossewaarde Jacobus M

机构信息

Medical Microbiology, and Molecular Diagnostics Unit, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Mar 8;11(3):e0150755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150755. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of our study was the development of a semi-quantitative real-time PCR to detect uropathogens. Two multiplex PCR reactions were designed to detect Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter spp., Proteus mirabilis, Enterococcus faecalis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. 16S based PCR was performed in parallel to detect Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Firstly to identify non-targeted agents of infection in the same urine specimen, and secondly to quantify background flora. The method was evaluated in comparison with standard bacterial culture, and a commercial PCR kit for detection of uropathogens.

FINDINGS

Analysis with a known panel of 116 clinical isolates yielded a PCR specificity of 100%. Analysis of urine specimens from 211 patients revealed a high correlation of PCR Cq values with both culture positivity and quantity. Concordance between PCR and culture was 98% when both methods yielded results. PCR was found to be more sensitive than culture. With a cut-off Cq value of 33, the negative predictive value of PCR was 94%. The 16S PCR confirmed most results. One specimen was positive by 16S PCR suggesting another cause of infection not detected by the specific PCR assays.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that it is feasible to detect and identify uropathogens by multiplex real-time PCR assay.

摘要

背景

我们研究的目的是开发一种用于检测尿路病原体的半定量实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)。设计了两个多重PCR反应来检测大肠杆菌、克雷伯菌属、肠杆菌属、柠檬酸杆菌属、奇异变形杆菌、粪肠球菌和铜绿假单胞菌。同时进行基于16S的PCR以检测革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性细菌。一是为了识别同一尿液标本中未靶向的感染病原体,二是为了对背景菌群进行定量。将该方法与标准细菌培养法以及一种用于检测尿路病原体的商业PCR试剂盒进行比较评估。

研究结果

对一组已知的116株临床分离株进行分析,PCR特异性为100%。对211例患者的尿液标本进行分析发现,PCR的Cq值与培养阳性率和菌量均高度相关。当两种方法都得出结果时,PCR与培养的一致性为98%。发现PCR比培养更敏感。Cq值截断值为33时,PCR的阴性预测值为94%。16S PCR证实了大多数结果。有一个标本16S PCR呈阳性,提示存在特异性PCR检测未发现的其他感染原因。

结论

我们得出结论,通过多重实时PCR检测法检测和鉴定尿路病原体是可行的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/628b/4783162/fe85079656ab/pone.0150755.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验