McKechnie Michelle L, Kong Fanrong, Gilbert Gwendolyn L
Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Western Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Methods Mol Biol. 2013;943:229-45. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-353-4_15.
Our aim was to develop and evaluate sensitive methods that would allow simultaneous direct identification of multiple potential pathogens in clinical specimens for diagnosis and epidemiological studies, using a multiplex PCR-based reverse line blot assay. We have previously developed assays suitable for detection of bacterial respiratory and systemic pathogens. In this chapter we describe, in detail, a method developed to identify 14 genital microorganisms, for use in epidemiological studies of genital infection or colonization, using first voided urine specimens. The 14 urogenital pathogens or putative pathogens studied were Trichomonas vaginalis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, N. meningitidis, Chlamydia trachomatis, Ureaplasma parvum, U. urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis, M. genitalium, Gardnerella vaginalis, Haemophilus influenzae, herpes simplex virus 1 and 2, and adenovirus. Two species-specific primer pairs and probes were designed for each target. The method was validated using a reference strain or a well-characterized clinical isolate of each target organism. In a clinical study among men attending sexual health clinics in Sydney, we used the assay to compare rates of detection of the 14 organisms in men with urethritis with those in asymptomatic controls and found the method to be sensitive, specific, convenient, and relatively inexpensive.
我们的目标是开发并评估一种灵敏的方法,该方法能够运用基于多重聚合酶链反应的反向线印迹分析法,在临床标本中同时直接鉴定多种潜在病原体,以用于诊断和流行病学研究。我们之前已经开发出适用于检测细菌呼吸道和全身性病原体的检测方法。在本章中,我们详细描述了一种用于鉴定14种生殖系统微生物的方法,该方法使用首次晨尿标本,用于生殖系统感染或定植的流行病学研究。所研究的14种泌尿生殖系统病原体或假定病原体为阴道毛滴虫、肺炎链球菌、淋病奈瑟菌、脑膜炎奈瑟菌、沙眼衣原体、微小脲原体、解脲脲原体、人型支原体、生殖支原体、阴道加德纳菌、流感嗜血杆菌、单纯疱疹病毒1型和2型以及腺病毒。针对每个靶标设计了两对种特异性引物和探针。该方法使用每种靶标生物体的参考菌株或特征明确的临床分离株进行了验证。在一项针对悉尼性健康诊所男性患者的临床研究中,我们使用该检测方法比较了尿道炎男性患者与无症状对照者中14种生物体的检出率,发现该方法灵敏、特异、便捷且相对廉价。