Arena J G, Sherman R A, Bruno G M, Young T R
Veterans Administration Medical Center, Augusta, GA 30910.
Int J Psychophysiol. 1990 Jul;9(1):31-7. doi: 10.1016/0167-8760(90)90005-x.
This paper presents the results of two studies in which bilateral surface EMG recordings of paraspinal muscle tension were measured in 29 lower back pain and 20 normal subjects in 6 different positions (standing, bending from the waist, rising, sitting with back supported, sitting unsupported, prone) on two occasions, and a comparison of the data from both studies. Measures were highly reliable when examined using analysis of variance procedures. Statistically significant reliability coefficients were obtained when the absolute values of the measures were examined, although in some instances less than 20% of the variance was explained. When examined as relative [percent change from baseline (prone) condition] values, differences between the two groups were observed: the normals were statistically more reliable than lower back pain subjects during every condition. Implications for clinical work and both basic and applied research are discussed.
本文介绍了两项研究的结果。在这两项研究中,对29名下背痛患者和20名正常受试者在两种情况下的6种不同姿势(站立、弯腰、起身、背靠支撑坐着、无支撑坐着、俯卧)下双侧椎旁肌张力的表面肌电图记录进行了测量,并对两项研究的数据进行了比较。使用方差分析程序进行检查时,测量结果具有高度可靠性。在检查测量值的绝对值时,获得了具有统计学意义的可靠性系数,尽管在某些情况下,解释的方差不到20%。当作为相对值[相对于基线(俯卧)状态的百分比变化]进行检查时,观察到两组之间存在差异:在每种情况下,正常受试者在统计学上比下背痛受试者更可靠。文中讨论了这些结果对临床工作以及基础研究和应用研究的意义。