Centre for Mental Health Research, Australian National University Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Front Psychiatry. 2010 May 11;1:11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2010.00011. eCollection 2010.
Defining how brain structures differ in pre-clinical dementia is important to better understand the pathological processes involved and to inform clinical practice. The aim of this study was to identify significant brain correlates (volume and asymmetry in volume) of mild cognitive disorders when compared to normal controls in a large community-based sample of young-old individuals who were assessed for cognitive impairment.
Cortical and sub-cortical volumes were measured using a semi-automated method in 398 participants aged 64-70 years who were selected from a larger randomly sampled cohort and who agreed to undergo an MRI scan. Diagnoses were reached based on established protocols for MCI and a more inclusive category of any Mild Cognitive Disorder (any-MCD: which includes AAMI, AACD, OCD, MNC, CDR, MCI). Logistic regression analyses were used to assess the relationship between volume and asymmetry of theoretically relevant cerebral structures (predictors) and MCI or any-MCD while controlling for age, sex, and intra-cranial volume.
The main correlates of cognitive impairment assessed in multivariate analyses were hippocampal asymmetry (more to left, MCI: OR 0.83, 95%CI 0.71-0.96, p = 0.013; MCD: OR 0.86, 95%CI 0.77-0.97, p = 0.011), lateral ventricle asymmetry (more to left, MCI: OR 0.95, 95%CI 0.91-0.99, p = 0.009; MCD: OR 0.95, 95%CI 0.92-0.98, p = 0.004), and cerebellar cortex asymmetry (more to right, MCI: OR 1.51, 95%CI 1.13-2.01, p = 0.005).
In this population-based cohort stronger associations were found between asymmetry measures, rather than raw volumes in cerebral structures, and mild cognitive disorders.
在临床前痴呆症中定义脑结构的差异对于更好地理解所涉及的病理过程并为临床实践提供信息非常重要。本研究的目的是在一个大的基于社区的年轻老年人样本中,当与正常对照相比时,确定轻度认知障碍的显著脑相关物(体积和体积不对称),这些老年人因认知障碍而接受评估。
使用半自动方法测量 398 名年龄在 64-70 岁的参与者的皮质和皮质下体积,这些参与者是从更大的随机抽样队列中选择的,并同意接受 MRI 扫描。根据 MCI 的既定方案以及更广泛的任何轻度认知障碍类别(任何-MCD:包括 AAMI、AACD、OCD、MNC、CDR、MCI)来确定诊断。逻辑回归分析用于评估在控制年龄、性别和颅内体积后,理论上相关的大脑结构(预测因子)的体积和不对称与 MCI 或任何-MCD 之间的关系。
在多变量分析中,认知障碍的主要相关物是海马体不对称(左侧更多,MCI:OR 0.83,95%CI 0.71-0.96,p=0.013;MCD:OR 0.86,95%CI 0.77-0.97,p=0.011),侧脑室不对称(左侧更多,MCI:OR 0.95,95%CI 0.91-0.99,p=0.009;MCD:OR 0.95,95%CI 0.92-0.98,p=0.004)和小脑皮质不对称(右侧更多,MCI:OR 1.51,95%CI 1.13-2.01,p=0.005)。
在这个基于人群的队列中,大脑结构的不对称性测量值与轻度认知障碍之间的相关性更强,而不是原始体积。