Scholich S L, Hallner D, Wittenberg R H, Rusu A C, Hasenbring M I
Abteilung für Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum.
Schmerz. 2011 Apr;25(2):184-90. doi: 10.1007/s00482-011-1023-6.
The variables pain intensity (SI), disability (DS) and quality of life (QoL) belong to a set of primary patient-based outcomes in chronic low back pain (CLBP). The avoidance-endurance model (AEM) assumes three maladaptive and one adaptive pain response pattern. The purpose of this study was to study the level and course of the outcomes with regard to the four AEM patterns.
A total of 52 CLBP inpatients were investigated at 2 points in time: during the first days after admission and 6 months after the acute exacerbation of pain. Differences between AEM patterns were analyzed with repeated measurement analyses of variance.
Groups differences were found for SI (F((3, 48))=2.82, p<0.05), general (F((3, 48))=6.78, p<0.05) and health-related QoL (F((3, 48))=5.99, p <0.05). In contrast, for the variable disability only a significant time effect was found.
The results show differences in the level and process of SI, DS and QoL between the subgroups. An AEM-based classification of subgroups is also reasonable for CLPB patients.
疼痛强度(SI)、功能障碍(DS)和生活质量(QoL)等变量属于慢性下腰痛(CLBP)一组基于患者的主要结局指标。回避-耐受模型(AEM)假定存在三种适应不良和一种适应性疼痛反应模式。本研究的目的是研究这四种AEM模式下结局指标的水平和变化过程。
共对52例CLBP住院患者在两个时间点进行了调查:入院后的头几天以及疼痛急性加重后6个月。采用重复测量方差分析来分析AEM模式之间的差异。
发现SI(F((3, 48))=2.82, p<0.05)、总体(F((3, 48))=6.78, p<0.05)以及与健康相关的QoL(F((3, 48))=5.99, p <0.05)存在组间差异。相比之下,对于功能障碍变量,仅发现了显著的时间效应。
结果显示各亚组在SI、DS和QoL的水平及变化过程上存在差异。基于AEM的亚组分类对于CLPB患者也是合理的。