School of Health Professions, Institute of Physiotherapy, University of Applied Sciences ZHAW, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Pain in Motion Research Group (www.paininmotion.be), Brussels, Belgium.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Nov 6;25(1):884. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07986-x.
In musculoskeletal pain (MSP), pain duration, disability, and mental health relate to how a person engages in daily activities. The self-reporting questionnaire Activity Patterns Scale (APS) assesses these activity patterns and their subscales: Pacing (Pacing to increase activity levels,Pacing to conserve energy for valued activities,Pacing to reduce pain); Avoidance (Pain avoidance,Activity avoidance); Pacing (Excessive persistence, Task-contingent persistence, Pain-contingent persistence). This investigation translated the APS into German and estimated its internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity. The APS translation was conducted following international guidelines for the transcultural adaptation of self-reported measures. For the construct validity, the Avoidance Endurance Fast-Screening (AE-FS), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), and Coping Strategies Questionnaires (CSQ) scales were employed. Sixty-five participants with MSP contributed to a baseline survey with a follow-up at two weeks. The German version of the APS subscales demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.670-0.89) and satisfactory test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.72-0.82); only Task-contingent persistence revealed a poor result. Construct validity was supported by significant correlations between APS subscales (pacing, avoidance, persistence) with related measures, including the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (0.27 to 0.40; -0.50 to 0.55; 0.27 to 0.50), the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (0.28 to 0.47; 0.36 to 0.37; 0.38), and Avoidance-Endurance Fast Screening Pain Persistence Scale (none; none; 0.40). The findings demonstrate high construct validity by the substantial correlations in the predicted directions for the APS subscales and their corresponding questionnaires. The German version of the APS is a reliable and valid tool for assessing activity pattern subscales in individuals with MSP. This distinction could refine research and customize treatment instructions to regulate people's activity in clinical practice.
在肌肉骨骼疼痛(MSP)中,疼痛持续时间、残疾和心理健康与一个人参与日常活动的方式有关。自我报告问卷活动模式量表(APS)评估这些活动模式及其子量表: pacing(增加活动水平的 pacing,为有价值的活动节约能量的 pacing,减少疼痛的 pacing);回避(疼痛回避,活动回避);坚持(过度坚持,任务相关坚持,疼痛相关坚持)。本研究将 APS 翻译成德语,并估计其内部一致性、重测信度和结构有效性。APS 的翻译是根据自我报告测量的跨文化适应的国际指南进行的。为了评估结构有效性,采用了回避耐力快速筛查(AE-FS)、坦帕运动恐惧量表(TSK)和应对策略问卷(CSQ)量表。65 名 MSP 参与者参与了基线调查,并在两周后进行了随访。APS 子量表的德语版本表现出良好的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha=0.670-0.89)和令人满意的重测信度(组内相关系数=0.72-0.82);只有任务相关坚持的结果较差。APS 子量表(pacing、avoidance、persistence)与相关测量之间的显著相关性支持了结构有效性,包括应对策略问卷(0.27 至 0.40;-0.50 至 0.55;0.27 至 0.50)、坦帕运动恐惧量表(0.28 至 0.47;0.36 至 0.37;0.38)和回避耐力快速筛查疼痛坚持量表(无;无;0.40)。APS 子量表及其相应问卷的预测方向的大量相关性表明,该研究结果具有较高的结构有效性。APS 的德语版本是一种可靠和有效的工具,可用于评估 MSP 个体的活动模式子量表。这种区分可以细化研究并定制治疗方案,以在临床实践中调节人们的活动。