Suppr超能文献

肌肉骨骼疼痛活动模式量表(APS)德语版的翻译、信度和效度:一项方法学研究。

Translation, reliability, and validity of the German version of the Activity Patterns Scale (APS) in musculoskeletal pain: a methodological study.

机构信息

School of Health Professions, Institute of Physiotherapy, University of Applied Sciences ZHAW, Winterthur, Switzerland.

Pain in Motion Research Group (www.paininmotion.be), Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Nov 6;25(1):884. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07986-x.

Abstract

In musculoskeletal pain (MSP), pain duration, disability, and mental health relate to how a person engages in daily activities. The self-reporting questionnaire Activity Patterns Scale (APS) assesses these activity patterns and their subscales: Pacing (Pacing to increase activity levels,Pacing to conserve energy for valued activities,Pacing to reduce pain); Avoidance (Pain avoidance,Activity avoidance); Pacing (Excessive persistence, Task-contingent persistence, Pain-contingent persistence). This investigation translated the APS into German and estimated its internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity. The APS translation was conducted following international guidelines for the transcultural adaptation of self-reported measures. For the construct validity, the Avoidance Endurance Fast-Screening (AE-FS), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), and Coping Strategies Questionnaires (CSQ) scales were employed. Sixty-five participants with MSP contributed to a baseline survey with a follow-up at two weeks. The German version of the APS subscales demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.670-0.89) and satisfactory test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.72-0.82); only Task-contingent persistence revealed a poor result. Construct validity was supported by significant correlations between APS subscales (pacing, avoidance, persistence) with related measures, including the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (0.27 to 0.40; -0.50 to 0.55; 0.27 to 0.50), the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (0.28 to 0.47; 0.36 to 0.37; 0.38), and Avoidance-Endurance Fast Screening Pain Persistence Scale (none; none; 0.40). The findings demonstrate high construct validity by the substantial correlations in the predicted directions for the APS subscales and their corresponding questionnaires. The German version of the APS is a reliable and valid tool for assessing activity pattern subscales in individuals with MSP. This distinction could refine research and customize treatment instructions to regulate people's activity in clinical practice.

摘要

在肌肉骨骼疼痛(MSP)中,疼痛持续时间、残疾和心理健康与一个人参与日常活动的方式有关。自我报告问卷活动模式量表(APS)评估这些活动模式及其子量表: pacing(增加活动水平的 pacing,为有价值的活动节约能量的 pacing,减少疼痛的 pacing);回避(疼痛回避,活动回避);坚持(过度坚持,任务相关坚持,疼痛相关坚持)。本研究将 APS 翻译成德语,并估计其内部一致性、重测信度和结构有效性。APS 的翻译是根据自我报告测量的跨文化适应的国际指南进行的。为了评估结构有效性,采用了回避耐力快速筛查(AE-FS)、坦帕运动恐惧量表(TSK)和应对策略问卷(CSQ)量表。65 名 MSP 参与者参与了基线调查,并在两周后进行了随访。APS 子量表的德语版本表现出良好的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha=0.670-0.89)和令人满意的重测信度(组内相关系数=0.72-0.82);只有任务相关坚持的结果较差。APS 子量表(pacing、avoidance、persistence)与相关测量之间的显著相关性支持了结构有效性,包括应对策略问卷(0.27 至 0.40;-0.50 至 0.55;0.27 至 0.50)、坦帕运动恐惧量表(0.28 至 0.47;0.36 至 0.37;0.38)和回避耐力快速筛查疼痛坚持量表(无;无;0.40)。APS 子量表及其相应问卷的预测方向的大量相关性表明,该研究结果具有较高的结构有效性。APS 的德语版本是一种可靠和有效的工具,可用于评估 MSP 个体的活动模式子量表。这种区分可以细化研究并定制治疗方案,以在临床实践中调节人们的活动。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Exploring Changes in Activity Patterns in Individuals with Chronic Pain.探讨慢性疼痛患者活动模式的变化。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 19;17(10):3560. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103560.
10
What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention.什么是下背痛以及为什么我们需要关注它。
Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2356-2367. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30480-X. Epub 2018 Mar 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验