Nurture Research Center, Provimi North America, Lewisburg, OH 45338, USA.
J Dairy Sci. 2011 Apr;94(4):2138-46. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3841.
Housing, bedding, and summer cooling were management options evaluated. Holstein calves (42±2 kg of body weight) initially 2 to 5 d of age were managed in southwest Ohio in poly hutches or wire mesh pens in a curtain-sided nursery with no supplemental heat. Calves were fed milk replacer (27% crude protein, 17% fat fed at 0.657 kg of dry matter per calf daily), starter (20% crude protein dry matter, textured, fed free-choice), and water (free-choice). Measurements were for 56 d. In trial 1, 28 calves per treatment were bedded with straw and housed in either hutches or nursery pens. This trial was conducted from September to March; the average temperature was 8°C and ranged from -17 to 31°C. In trial 2a, 16 calves per treatment were managed in nursery pens bedded with straw, in nursery pens bedded with sand, or in hutches bedded with sand. This trial was conducted from May to September; the average temperature was 21°C and ranged from 7 to 33°C. In trial 2b, 26 calves per treatment were housed in nursery pens and bedded with straw. This trial was conducted from May to September; the average temperature was 22°C and ranged from 8 to 34°C. One treatment was cooled with fans between 0800 and 1700 h and the other was not. Data were analyzed as repeated measures in a completely randomized block design by trial, with calf as the experimental unit. In trial 3, air in the nursery and calf hutches used above was sampled 35 d apart for calves aged 5 and 40 d. Air in individual hutches on 2 commercial farms was sampled for 5- and 40-d-old calves for 2 hutch types. Air in the multi-calf hutches was sampled for calves of 75 and 110 d of age. Bacterial concentrations of air samples were analyzed (log10) as odds ratios by Proc Logistic in SAS software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC); differences were declared at P<0.05. In trial 1, weight gain of calves in nursery pens was 6% greater and feed efficiency was 4% greater than that of calves in hutches. In trial 2a, weight gain and starter intake of calves in the nursery with straw bedding were greater and scouring was less than that in calves bedded with sand in the nursery or hutches. The relative humidity was greater in the hutches than in the nursery pens. In trial 2b, weight gain, feed efficiency, and hip width change were greater and breaths per minute were less for calves cooled with fans compared with calves that were not cooled. In trial 3, airborne bacteria concentrations were greater in the hutches than in the nursery pens. Straw bedding (vs. sand), nursery pens (vs. hutches), and summer daytime cooling with fans improved calf weight gain.
住房、卧床和夏季降温是评估的管理选项。荷斯坦小牛(42±2 公斤体重)最初在俄亥俄州西南部管理,年龄在 2 至 5 天,在带有窗帘侧门的托儿所中,在没有补充热量的情况下,使用多孔屋或金属丝围栏饲养。小牛喂食代乳(27%粗蛋白,17%脂肪,每天每头小牛 0.657 公斤干物质)、起始料(20%粗蛋白干物质,质地柔软,自由选择)和水(自由选择)。测量持续 56 天。在试验 1 中,每个处理 28 头小牛用稻草垫料,并分别安置在畜舍或托儿所围栏中。该试验于 9 月至 3 月进行;平均温度为 8°C,范围从-17°C 到 31°C。在试验 2a 中,每个处理 16 头小牛,在托儿所围栏中用稻草垫料、在托儿所围栏中用沙子垫料或在畜舍中用沙子垫料管理。该试验于 5 月至 9 月进行;平均温度为 21°C,范围从 7°C 到 33°C。在试验 2b 中,每个处理 26 头小牛安置在托儿所围栏中,并用稻草垫料。该试验于 5 月至 9 月进行;平均温度为 22°C,范围从 8°C 到 34°C。一组小牛在 0800 至 1700 小时之间使用风扇降温,另一组小牛不降温。通过试验,将数据作为重复测量进行完全随机区组设计分析,将小牛作为实验单位。在试验 3 中,每隔 35 天,对 5 天和 40 天大的小牛进行托儿所和小牛畜舍的空气采样。对 2 个商业农场的 2 种畜舍类型的 5 天和 40 天大的小牛进行了 2 小时畜舍的空气采样。对 75 天和 110 天大的小牛进行了多小牛畜舍的空气采样。使用 SAS 软件中的 Proc Logistic 对空气样本的细菌浓度(log10)进行了优势比分析(SAS Institute Inc.,Cary,NC);宣布差异显著 P<0.05。在试验 1 中,托儿所围栏中小牛的增重比畜舍中小牛高 6%,饲料效率高 4%。在试验 2a 中,在托儿所用稻草垫料的小牛的增重和起动料摄入量更大,腹泻更少,而在托儿所用沙子垫料或畜舍的小牛则更少。畜舍中的相对湿度高于托儿所围栏。在试验 2b 中,与未冷却的小牛相比,使用风扇冷却的小牛的增重、饲料效率和臀部宽度变化更大,每分钟呼吸次数更少。在试验 3 中,畜舍中的空气细菌浓度高于托儿所围栏。稻草垫料(与沙子相比)、托儿所围栏(与畜舍相比)和夏季白天使用风扇降温提高了小牛的体重。