• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生育期妇女宫颈的组织学复发和环扎术深度:不完全切除与不良妊娠结局。

Histological recurrence and depth of loop treatment of the cervix in women of reproductive age: incomplete excision versus adverse pregnancy outcome.

机构信息

Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, UK.

出版信息

BJOG. 2011 May;118(6):685-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02929.x. Epub 2011 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02929.x
PMID:21429068
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Recent meta-analyses have shown that loop treatment of the cervix of > 10 mm depth may be associated with adverse outcomes in future pregnancies. The aim of this study is to assess the rate of incomplete excision and recurrent disease in relation to depth of excision in women of reproductive age undergoing loop treatment.

DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

SETTING

Colposcopy Clinic, Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Gateshead, UK.

POPULATION

In all, 1558 women undergoing loop treatment for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (HGCIN) between 1998 and 2003.

METHODS

Women were followed up until 2008. Recurrence was analysed using Kaplan-Meier plots.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Incomplete excision rates and recurrence rates. Recurrence was defined as post-treatment disease with high-grade histology. Any dyskaryotic cytology on follow-up was also documented.

RESULTS

Recurrent high-grade disease on histology was found in 57/1558 (3.7%) women. In women ≤ 35 years old, despite a greater rate of incomplete excision at the endocervical margin at loop depths < 10 mm compared with ≥ 10 mm (24.4% versus 13.3%, P < 0.01), the recurrence rate was similar between the two groups (4.3% versus 3.4%, log-rank, P = 0.52). In contrast, a loop depth < 10 mm was associated with a higher disease recurrence rate (7.5% versus 3.0%, log-rank, P = 0.05) in women > 35 years.

CONCLUSION

In women of reproductive age requiring treatment for HGCIN, colposcopists performing loop excision should aim for < 10 mm depth. This provides adequate treatment for HGCIN and minimises the potential risk of adverse outcomes in future pregnancies.

摘要

目的

最近的荟萃分析表明,宫颈深度大于 10 毫米的环扎治疗可能与未来妊娠的不良结局有关。本研究旨在评估在接受环扎治疗的育龄妇女中,与切除深度相关的不完全切除率和复发病率。

设计

观察性队列研究。

地点

英国盖茨黑德北部妇科肿瘤中心阴道镜诊所。

人群

1998 年至 2003 年间共有 1558 名因高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变(HGCIN)接受环扎治疗的女性。

方法

所有女性均随访至 2008 年。采用 Kaplan-Meier 图分析复发情况。

结局测量

不完全切除率和复发率。复发定义为治疗后出现高级别组织学疾病。还记录了随访时任何不典型细胞学异常。

结果

在 1558 名女性中,有 57 名(3.7%)出现组织学上的复发性高级别疾病。在≤35 岁的女性中,尽管宫颈内口环扎深度<10 毫米的不完全切除率明显高于≥10 毫米(24.4%比 13.3%,P<0.01),但两组的复发率相似(4.3%比 3.4%,对数秩检验,P=0.52)。相比之下,环扎深度<10 毫米与>35 岁女性的疾病复发率较高(7.5%比 3.0%,对数秩检验,P=0.05)相关。

结论

在需要治疗 HGCIN 的育龄妇女中,行环扎切除术的阴道镜医师应将深度设定为<10 毫米。这为 HGCIN 提供了充分的治疗,并最大限度地降低了未来妊娠不良结局的潜在风险。

相似文献

1
Histological recurrence and depth of loop treatment of the cervix in women of reproductive age: incomplete excision versus adverse pregnancy outcome.生育期妇女宫颈的组织学复发和环扎术深度:不完全切除与不良妊娠结局。
BJOG. 2011 May;118(6):685-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02929.x. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
2
Histological recurrence and depth of loop treatment of the cervix in women of reproductive age: incomplete excision versus adverse pregnancy outcome.育龄期女性宫颈组织学复发及环形电切术治疗深度:不完全切除与不良妊娠结局
BJOG. 2011 Nov;118(12):1536; author reply 1537. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03125.x.
3
Risk of preterm birth in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade one: a population-based cohort study.宫颈上皮内瘤变 1 级患者早产风险:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Feb;97(2):135-141. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13256. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
4
Effect of margin status on cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence following LLETZ in women over 50 years.切缘状态对50岁以上女性行大环形电切除术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变复发的影响
BJOG. 2008 Sep;115(10):1238-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01853.x.
5
Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease-a 16-year follow-up study.宫颈上皮内瘤变不完全切除作为疾病复发风险的预测指标:一项长达 16 年的随访研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;222(2):172.e1-172.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.042. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
6
Long-term cytological and histological outcomes in women managed with loop excision treatment under local anaesthetic for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.局部麻醉下采用环形切除术治疗高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变的女性的长期细胞学和组织学结果。
Cytopathology. 2011 Oct;22(5):334-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2010.00824.x. Epub 2010 Nov 14.
7
Long-term predictors of residual or recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2-3 after treatment with a large loop excision of the transformation zone: a retrospective study.宫颈转化区环形电切术后残留或复发的 2-3 级宫颈上皮内瘤变的长期预测因素:一项回顾性研究。
BJOG. 2020 Feb;127(3):377-387. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15996. Epub 2019 Dec 14.
8
Does histological incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia following large loop excision of transformation zone increase recurrence rates? A six year cytological follow up.转化区大环形切除术之后宫颈上皮内瘤变的组织学切除不完全会增加复发率吗?一项为期六年的细胞学随访。
BJOG. 2000 Oct;107(10):1298-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11623.x.
9
Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis.根据锥形切除深度对宫颈浸润前和早期浸润性疾病进行局部治疗后的不良产科结局:系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ. 2016 Jul 28;354:i3633. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3633.
10
[Clinical outcome and high risk factor for residual lesion analysis of HSIL half a year after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a clinical study of 1 502 cases].[宫颈环形电切术半年后高级别鳞状上皮内病变残留病灶分析的临床结局及高危因素:一项1502例的临床研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Nov 25;52(11):751-756. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2017.11.007.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors related to recurrence after surgical excision procedure for cervical dysplasia.与宫颈发育异常手术切除术后复发相关的危险因素。
Hippokratia. 2023 Oct-Dec;27(4):132-140.
2
Endocervical crypt involvement by high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and its association with high-grade histopathological recurrence after cervical excision in women with negative excision margins: a systematic review and meta-analysis.高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变累及宫颈管内腺体与宫颈切除术后切缘阴性的女性中高级别组织学复发的相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Mar;309(3):939-948. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07242-y. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
3
Rate of Involved Endocervical Margins According to High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Subtype and Transformation Zone Type in Specimens with Cone Length ≤ 10 mm versus > 10 mm-A Retrospective Analysis.
根据高危型人乳头瘤病毒亚型和转化区类型,对锥切长度≤10mm与>10mm标本的宫颈管切缘累及率进行回顾性分析。
Life (Basel). 2023 Aug 20;13(8):1775. doi: 10.3390/life13081775.
4
Improving the surgical performance during LLETZ cervical excision to optimise oncological and obstetric outcomes: critical appraisal of a novel high-fidelity simulator.提高宫颈环形电切术(LLETZ)的手术操作水平以优化肿瘤学和产科结局:对一种新型高保真模拟器的批判性评估
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 May;307(5):1643-1644. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06576-3. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
5
Healing pattern of the cervical stroma following cold coagulation treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A case report.宫颈上皮内瘤变冷凝治疗后宫颈基质的愈合模式:一例报告
Oncol Lett. 2022 Mar;23(3):81. doi: 10.3892/ol.2022.13201. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
6
The vaginal microbiota and innate immunity after local excisional treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.宫颈上皮内瘤变局部切除治疗后阴道微生物群和固有免疫。
Genome Med. 2021 Nov 4;13(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s13073-021-00977-w.
7
Conservative treatment of microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix stage IA1: Defining conization height to an optimal oncological outcome.宫颈微浸润鳞癌 IA1 期的保守治疗:定义锥高以获得最佳的肿瘤学结局。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 20;16(7):e0253998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253998. eCollection 2021.
8
Defining the short-term disease recurrence after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).界定环形电切术(LEEP)后的短期疾病复发情况。
BMC Womens Health. 2020 Feb 26;20(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-00901-1.
9
A method to improve the accuracy between the presumed depth of excision and the actual depth of excision in women receiving LLETZ cervical treatment; a single-center, two-operator experience.一种提高接受大环状宫颈切除术(LLETZ)治疗的女性患者切除深度推测值与实际切除深度之间准确性的方法;单中心、两名操作者的经验。
Hippokratia. 2018 Jul-Sep;22(3):113-121.
10
Prevention of Cervical Cancer: Guideline of the DGGG and the DKG (S3 Level, AWMF Register Number 015/027OL, December 2017) - Part 2 on Triage, Treatment and Follow-up.宫颈癌的预防:德国妇产科学会(DGGG)和德国妇科肿瘤学会(DKG)指南(S3级别,德国医学质量与效率理事会(AWMF)注册号015/027OL,2017年12月)——关于分流、治疗及随访的第2部分
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2019 Feb;79(2):160-176. doi: 10.1055/a-0828-7722. Epub 2019 Feb 18.