口服类固醇、鼓室内类固醇、高压氧和口服类固醇+高压氧治疗特发性突发性聋的疗效比较。

Efficacy comparison of oral steroid, intratympanic steroid, hyperbaric oxygen and oral steroid + hyperbaric oxygen treatments in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss cases.

机构信息

Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Otolaryngology Department, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Dec;268(12):1735-41. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1563-5. Epub 2011 Mar 23.

Abstract

Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss is a rare disorder of unknown pathogenesis in which hearing is lost partially or totally. About 60 treatment modalities have been described. We aimed to compare the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen, oral steroid, intratympanic steroid therapy and their combinations in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients. Files of patients who were followed up between 2004 and 2010 in our clinic were examined retrospectively. Patients were divided into four groups according to the therapy received: Oral steroid, oral steroid + hyperbaric oxygen, intratympanic steroid and hyperbaric oxygen. Treatment success was assessed by Siegel criteria and mean gains using pre-treatment and post-treatment audiograms. 217 patients and 219 ears were examined. The proportion of patients responding to therapy was the highest in the oral steroid + hyperbaric oxygen group with 86.88% (53/61) followed by the oral steroid group with 63.79% (37/58), the intratympanic steroid group with 46,51% (20/43) and the hyperbaric oxygen group with 43.85% (25/57). The proportion of patients who had complete recovery was the highest in the oral steroid + hyperbaric oxygen group with 42.6% (26/61) followed by the oral steroid group with 19.0% (11/58), the hyperbaric oxygen group with 17.5% (10/57) and the intratympanic steroid group with 11.6% (5/43). The oral steroid + hyperbaric oxygen group has the highest mean hearing gain among all groups (p < 0.05). Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients receiving oral steroid + hyperbaric oxygen combination therapy have a higher likelihood of recovery than patients receiving oral steroids, hyperbaric oxygen or intratympanic steroids alone.

摘要

特发性突发性聋是一种病因不明的罕见疾病,其听力部分或完全丧失。已有约 60 种治疗方法被描述。我们旨在比较高压氧、口服类固醇、鼓室内类固醇治疗及其联合应用于特发性突发性聋患者的疗效。回顾性分析了 2004 年至 2010 年在我院随访的患者的档案。根据接受的治疗方法将患者分为 4 组:口服类固醇、口服类固醇+高压氧、鼓室内类固醇和高压氧。根据治疗前后听力图采用 Siegel 标准和平均增益评估治疗效果。共检查了 217 例患者和 219 耳。在接受治疗的患者中,口服类固醇+高压氧组的反应率最高,为 86.88%(53/61),其次是口服类固醇组,为 63.79%(37/58),鼓室内类固醇组为 46.51%(20/43),高压氧组为 43.85%(25/57)。在完全康复的患者中,口服类固醇+高压氧组的比例最高,为 42.6%(26/61),其次是口服类固醇组,为 19.0%(11/58),高压氧组为 17.5%(10/57),鼓室内类固醇组为 11.6%(5/43)。所有组中,口服类固醇+高压氧组的平均听力增益最高(p<0.05)。接受口服类固醇+高压氧联合治疗的特发性突发性聋患者的康复可能性高于单独接受口服类固醇、高压氧或鼓室内类固醇治疗的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索