• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本卫生学会是否需要自己的行为准则?基于问卷调查的理事会成员和青年成员的回应比较。

Does the Japanese Society for Hygiene need its own Code of Conduct? A comparison of the responses of councilors and junior members based on a questionnaire survey.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.

出版信息

Environ Health Prev Med. 2011 May;16(3):178-84. doi: 10.1007/s12199-010-0175-9. Epub 2010 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1007/s12199-010-0175-9
PMID:21431804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3078295/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare current awareness of the "On a Code of Conduct for Scientists" (OCCS) among members of the Japanese Society for Hygiene (JSH).

METHOD

An anonymous self-administered questionnaire was mailed to JSH members, including 439 councilors and 376 junior members (who were under 50 years of age with a membership of 3 years or longer, excluding councilors). Councilors were surveyed from November to December 2007, while junior members were surveyed from November to December 2008.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 40.6% (n = 331/815), with responses from 46.7% of the councilors (n = 205/439) and 33.5% of the junior members (n = 126/376). Among the respondents, 36.0% of councilors (n = 68) and 59.8% of junior members (n = 73) did not know the contents of "On the Code of Conduct for Scientists" (P < 0.01), while 76.3% of councilors (n = 145) and 61.4% of junior members (n = 75) had not heard of it (P < 0.05). However, a majority of the respondents reported interest in the Code [70.0% of councilors (n = 133), 68.6% of junior members (n = 83)] (P < 0.05) and a favorable attitude towards research ethics education [69.3% of councilors (n = 133), 68.9% of junior members (n = 84)] (P < 0.54). In addition, 24.3% of the responding councilors (n = 46) and 15.7% of the responding junior members (n = 19) believe it necessary for JSH to formulate its own code of conduct for scientists (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

We clarified the current state of awareness of the OCCS among JSH members as well as the opinion of members for the JSH to have its own Code of Conduct for Scientists. This result provides important information that should be considered during the formulation of an individual code of conduct for scientists in the JSH.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较日本卫生学会(JSH)成员对《科学家行为准则》(OCCS)的认知现状。

方法

向 JSH 成员(包括 439 名理事和 376 名青年成员)邮寄了一份匿名自填式问卷。青年成员的调查时间为 2008 年 11 月至 12 月,理事的调查时间为 2007 年 11 月至 12 月。

结果

总应答率为 40.6%(n=331/815),其中理事的应答率为 46.7%(n=205/439),青年成员的应答率为 33.5%(n=126/376)。在应答者中,36.0%的理事(n=68)和 59.8%的青年成员(n=73)不知道《科学家行为准则》的内容(P<0.01),而 76.3%的理事(n=145)和 61.4%的青年成员(n=75)没有听说过该准则(P<0.05)。然而,大多数应答者表示对该准则感兴趣[70.0%的理事(n=133),68.6%的青年成员(n=83)](P<0.05),并对研究伦理教育持赞成态度[69.3%的理事(n=133),68.9%的青年成员(n=84)](P<0.54)。此外,24.3%的应答理事(n=46)和 15.7%的应答青年成员(n=19)认为 JSH 有必要制定自己的科学家行为准则(P<0.01)。

结论

本研究明确了 JSH 成员对 OCCS 的认知现状以及成员对 JSH 制定自己的科学家行为准则的意见。该结果提供了重要信息,在 JSH 制定个人科学家行为准则时应予以考虑。

相似文献

1
Does the Japanese Society for Hygiene need its own Code of Conduct? A comparison of the responses of councilors and junior members based on a questionnaire survey.日本卫生学会是否需要自己的行为准则?基于问卷调查的理事会成员和青年成员的回应比较。
Environ Health Prev Med. 2011 May;16(3):178-84. doi: 10.1007/s12199-010-0175-9. Epub 2010 Sep 23.
2
[Attitudes towards the code of conduct for scientists among council members of the Japanese Society for Hygiene].[日本卫生学会理事会成员对科学家行为准则的态度]
Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2010 Jan;65(1):60-74. doi: 10.1265/jjh.65.60.
3
Comparison of questionnaire responses regarding awareness of Japanese Society of Hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension between 2014 and 2019 in primary care.2014 年与 2019 年基层医疗中关于高血压管理的日本高血压学会指南知晓情况的问卷调查应答比较。
Hypertens Res. 2021 Sep;44(9):1147-1157. doi: 10.1038/s41440-021-00693-3. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
4
The implications of developing a profession-wide code of ethics.
Health Educ Q. 1983 Summer;10(2):120-5. doi: 10.1177/109019818301000204.
5
Do the national survey results reflect the state of drug-induced liver injury in a single local city in which there is no hospital having Members of the Board of Councilors of the Japan Society of Hepatology? Results of a questionnaire survey conducted in a local city.全国调查结果是否反映了某个单一地方城市的药物性肝损伤状况,而该城市没有日本肝病学会理事会成员的医院?在地方城市进行的问卷调查结果。
Hepatol Res. 2011 Mar;41(3):225-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2010.00762.x.
6
The Code of Professional Conduct for the Neurocritical Care Society.神经重症监护学会职业行为准则。
Neurocrit Care. 2015 Oct;23(2):145-8. doi: 10.1007/s12028-015-0175-0.
7
Awareness of and adherence to cancer screening guidelines among health professionals in Japan.日本医疗专业人员对癌症筛查指南的知晓与遵循情况。
Cancer Sci. 2007 Aug;98(8):1241-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00512.x. Epub 2007 May 30.
8
Role of professional organizations in setting and enforcing ethical norms.专业组织在制定和执行道德规范方面的作用。
Clin Dermatol. 2012 Mar-Apr;30(2):156-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2011.06.002.
9
Achieving cultural safety for Australia's First Peoples: a review of the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency-registered health practitioners' Codes of Conduct and Codes of Ethics.实现澳大利亚原住民的文化安全:对澳大利亚卫生从业人员管理局注册的卫生从业人员的行为准则和道德准则的审查。
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Aug;45(4):398-406. doi: 10.1071/AH20215.
10
American Health Information Management Association Code of Ethics. Revised and approved July 2004.
J AHIMA. 2004 Nov-Dec;75(10):80A-80D.

本文引用的文献

1
[Attitudes towards the code of conduct for scientists among council members of the Japanese Society for Hygiene].[日本卫生学会理事会成员对科学家行为准则的态度]
Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2010 Jan;65(1):60-74. doi: 10.1265/jjh.65.60.
2
Research ethics and lessons from Hwanggate: what can we learn from the Korean cloning fraud?研究伦理与黄禹锡事件的教训:我们能从韩国克隆造假事件中学到什么?
J Med Ethics. 2008 Mar;34(3):214-21. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.023721.
3
Korean scandal will have global fallout.韩国丑闻将产生全球影响。
Nature. 2005 Dec 22;438(7071):1056-7. doi: 10.1038/4381056a.
4
Scientific misconduct. More of Bell Labs physicist's papers retracted.科研不端行为。贝尔实验室物理学家更多论文被撤回。
Science. 2003 Jan 3;299(5603):31. doi: 10.1126/science.299.5603.31b.