Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu 807-8555, Japan.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011 Sep;18(5):678-83. doi: 10.1007/s00534-011-0375-8.
To examine the circumstances of medical treatment for acute pancreatitis before publication of the new Japanese (JPN) guidelines using the Japanese administrative database associated with the Diagnosis Procedure Combination system.
We collected data from 7,193 patients with acute pancreatitis in 2008 and examined the recommended medical treatment in the new JPN guidelines [from recommendations B (considered to be recommended treatments) to D (considered to be unacceptable treatments)] according to severity of acute pancreatitis. Patients were divided into two groups: mild cases (n = 6,520) and severe cases (n = 673).
Enteral nutrition for severe cases without ileus (recommendation B) was uncommon (13.5%). In contrast, prophylactic antibiotics were administered in a large number (80.4%) of mild cases without acute cholangitis (recommendation D). Furthermore, administration of H(2) receptor antagonists, except for cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (recommendation D), were performed in many patients with both mild and severe cases (66.8 vs. 78.6%).
This study demonstrated a discrepancy between actual medical treatment performed and the new JPN guidelines with regard to some of the medical treatments. Future studies are required after publication of the new JPN guidelines to determine how they affect medical treatments.
利用与诊断程序组合系统相关的日本行政数据库,在新日本指南发布之前,研究急性胰腺炎治疗的情况。
我们从 2008 年的 7193 例急性胰腺炎患者中收集数据,并根据急性胰腺炎的严重程度检查新日本指南中的推荐治疗[从推荐 B(被认为是推荐治疗)到 D(被认为是不可接受的治疗)]。患者分为两组:轻症组(n=6520)和重症组(n=673)。
对于无肠梗阻的重症患者,肠内营养(推荐 B)并不常见(13.5%)。相比之下,在没有急性胆管炎的轻症患者中,预防性抗生素的使用(推荐 D)数量很多。此外,重症和轻症患者均有大量使用 H2 受体拮抗剂(除上消化道出血的病例外,推荐 D)(66.8%比 78.6%)。
本研究表明,一些治疗方法与实际治疗之间存在差异。新日本指南发布后,需要进行进一步的研究,以确定其对治疗方法的影响。