Department of Animal Ecology, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, VU University, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Exp Appl Acarol. 2011 Jul;54(3):261-8. doi: 10.1007/s10493-011-9443-7. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
The frequency of damaged Varroa destructor Anderson and Trueman (Mesostigmata: Varroidae) found on the bottom board of hives of the honey bee, Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) has been used as an indicator of the degree of tolerance or resistance of honey bee colonies against mites. However, it is not clear that this measure is adequate. These injuries should be separated from regular dorsal dimples that have a developmental origin. To investigate damage to Varroa mites and regular dorsal dimples, 32 honey bee (A. mellifera) colonies were selected from four Iranian provinces: Isfahan, Markazi, Qazvin, and Tehran. These colonies were part of the National Honey bee Breeding Program that resulted in province-specific races. In April, Varroa mites were collected from heavily infested colonies and used to infest the 32 experimental colonies. In August, 20 of these colonies were selected (five colonies from each province). Adult bees from these colonies were placed in cages and after introducing mites, damaged mites were collected from each cage every day. The average percentage of injured mites ranged from 0.6 to 3.0% in four provinces. The results did not show any statistical differences between the colonies within provinces for injuries to mites, but there were some differences among province-specific lines. Two kinds of injuries to the mites were observed: injuries to legs and pedipalps, and injuries to other parts of the body. There were also some regular dorsal dimples on dorsal idiosoma of the mites that were placed in categories separate from mites damaged by bees. This type of classification helps identifying damage to mites and comparing them with developmental origin symptoms, and may provide criteria for selecting bees tolerant or resistant to this mite.
在蜂箱的底板上发现的已损坏的瓦螨(Mesostigmata: Varroidae)的频率,被用作衡量蜜蜂群体对螨虫的容忍度或抵抗力的指标。然而,目前尚不清楚这种措施是否足够。这些损伤应该与具有发育起源的常规背部凹痕区分开来。为了研究瓦螨和常规背部凹痕的损伤,从伊朗的四个省份(伊斯法罕、马赞德兰、卡兹文和德黑兰)选择了 32 个蜜蜂(A. mellifera)群体。这些群体是国家蜜蜂育种计划的一部分,该计划导致了特定省份的品种。四月份,从严重感染的群体中收集瓦螨,并将其用于感染 32 个实验群体。八月份,从这些群体中选择了 20 个(每个省份 5 个群体)。从这些群体中取出成年蜜蜂,将其放入笼子中,在引入螨虫后,每天从每个笼子中收集受损的螨虫。在四个省份,受伤螨虫的平均百分比范围为 0.6%至 3.0%。结果显示,同一省份内的群体之间,螨虫受伤没有统计学差异,但特定省份的品系之间存在一些差异。观察到两种对螨虫的损伤:对腿和触须的损伤,以及对身体其他部位的损伤。在放置在与蜜蜂损伤不同类别的螨虫的背部体节上,也有一些常规的背部凹痕。这种分类有助于识别螨虫的损伤,并将其与发育起源症状进行比较,可能为选择对这种螨虫具有耐受性或抵抗力的蜜蜂提供标准。