Aaronson N K
Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute.
Oncology (Williston Park). 1990 May;4(5):59-66; discussion 70.
While increasing attention is being paid to the feasibility of incorporating quality of life investigations into cancer clinical trials, and QOL data have played a prominent role in some recent trials, such studies remain the exception rather than the rule. This paper addresses a number of measurement, research design, and implementation issues surrounding clinical-trial-based quality of life studies. These include: the appropriate source of quality of life data; global versus multidimensional approaches to conceptualizing quality of life; the feasibility and desirability of a quality of life measurement "gold standard;" generic versus disease-specific measures; the role of psychometrics in selecting quality of life measures; the frequency and timing of data collection; and patient accrual and differential loss to follow-up. Where appropriate, areas of real or potential consensus on the methods of conducting quality of life investigations are highlighted.
虽然越来越多的人开始关注将生活质量调查纳入癌症临床试验的可行性,并且生活质量数据在最近的一些试验中发挥了重要作用,但这类研究仍然是例外而非惯例。本文探讨了围绕基于临床试验的生活质量研究的一些测量、研究设计和实施问题。这些问题包括:生活质量数据的合适来源;将生活质量概念化的整体方法与多维方法;生活质量测量“金标准”的可行性和可取性;通用测量方法与疾病特异性测量方法;心理测量学在选择生活质量测量方法中的作用;数据收集的频率和时间;以及患者入组和随访中的差异失访。在适当的地方,强调了在进行生活质量调查方法方面实际达成或潜在达成共识的领域。