Suppr超能文献

比较传统直丝弓技术和种植体支抗正畸治疗成人骨性开颌的疗效。

Comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes in adults with skeletal open bite between conventional edgewise treatment and implant-anchored orthodontics.

机构信息

Division of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Apr;139(4 Suppl):S60-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.029.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Open bites are known to be difficult malocclusions to treat. Generally, with conventional edgewise treatment, incisor extrusion rather than molar intrusion is observed. Recently, the use of miniscrews as anchorage has markedly increased. In this study, orthodontic treatment outcomes after conventional edgewise treatment and implant-anchored treatment were investigated by cephalometric analysis and several occlusal indexes. In addition, the stability of these patients 2 years after the retention phase was also analyzed.

METHODS

Thirty adults (15 for nonimplant treatment [non-IA group] and 15 for implant-anchored treatment [IA group]) were our subjects. Cephalometric analysis, peer assessment rating, discrepancy index, and objective grading system were used.

RESULTS

From the cephalometric values in the non-IA group, open-bite patients were generally treated by extrusion of the maxillary and mandibular incisors that resulted in clockwise rotation of the mandibular plane angle. In the IA group, intrusion of the maxillary and mandibular molars that resulted in counterclockwise rotation was noted. Furthermore, in the IA group, the soft-tissue analysis showed decreases in the facial convexity and the inferior labial sulcus angle that resulted in the disappearance of incompetent lips. In the retention phase, extrusion of the mandibular molars was observed in the IA group. From the objective grading system evaluation, significant reductions of overbite in canines and premolars were observed in both groups. Furthermore, less stability was observed in the IA group compared with the non-IA group according to the total objective grading system score.

CONCLUSIONS

Ideal occlusion can be achieved in adults with severe open bite with both conventional edgewise and implant-anchored orthodontic treatment. However, absolute intrusion of the molars and improvement in esthetics might be achieved more effectively by using miniscrews as an anchorage device. In addition, since a significant amount of tooth movement occurs with miniscrews, careful attention is required during the retention phase.

摘要

简介

开颌是一种较难矫治的错颌畸形。一般来说,在常规方丝弓矫治中,常观察到切牙的伸长而非磨牙的压低。近年来,微种植体支抗的应用显著增加。本研究通过头颅侧位片分析和多项咬合指数,比较了传统方丝弓矫治和种植体支抗矫治的治疗效果。此外,还分析了这些患者在保持阶段结束后 2 年的稳定性。

方法

30 名成年人(非种植体治疗组 15 例,种植体支抗治疗组 15 例)为研究对象。采用头颅侧位片分析、患者评价、差异指数和客观分级系统进行评估。

结果

从非种植体治疗组的头颅侧位片测量值来看,开颌患者的上颌和下颌切牙通常通过伸长来治疗,导致下颌平面角顺时针旋转。在种植体支抗治疗组中,上颌和下颌磨牙的压低导致逆时针旋转。此外,在种植体支抗治疗组中,软组织分析显示面凸度和下唇沟角度减小,导致无功能唇闭合。在保持阶段,种植体支抗治疗组的下颌磨牙发生伸长。从客观分级系统评估来看,两组的尖牙和前磨牙的覆牙合显著减少。此外,种植体支抗治疗组的总客观分级系统评分较非种植体治疗组稳定性差。

结论

成人严重开颌可通过常规方丝弓和种植体支抗正畸治疗获得理想的咬合。然而,使用微种植体作为支抗装置可能更有效地实现磨牙的绝对压低和改善美观。此外,由于微种植体支抗会引起大量的牙齿移动,因此在保持阶段需要特别注意。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验