• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共振频率不能预测出能使气流或容量最大化的高频胸壁按压设置。

Resonant frequency does not predict high-frequency chest compression settings that maximize airflow or volume.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Pulmonology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15201, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Pulmonol. 2011 Jun;46(6):604-9. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21414. Epub 2011 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1002/ppul.21414
PMID:21438176
Abstract

High-frequency chest compression (HFCC) is a therapy for cystic fibrosis (CF). We hypothesized that the resonant frequency (f(res)), as measured by impulse oscillometry, could be used to determine what HFCC vest settings produce maximal airflow or volume in pediatric CF patients. In 45 subjects, we studied: f(res), HFCC vest frequencies that subjects used (f(used)), and the HFCC vest frequencies that generated the greatest volume (f(vol)) and airflow (f(flow)) changes as measured by pneumotachometer. Median f(used) for 32 subjects was 14 Hz (range, 6-30). The rank order of the three most common f(used) was 15 Hz (28%) and 12 Hz (21%); three frequencies tied for third: 10, 11, and 14 Hz (5% each). Median f(res) for 43 subjects was 20.30 Hz (range, 7.85-33.65). Nineteen subjects underwent vest-tuning to determine f(vol) and f(flow). Median f(vol) was 8 Hz (range, 6-30). The rank order of the three most common f(vol) was: 8 Hz (42%), 6 Hz (32%), and 10 Hz (21%). Median f(flow) was 26 Hz (range, 8-30). The rank order of the three most common f(flow) was: 30 Hz (26%) and 28 Hz (21%); three frequencies tied for third: 8, 14, and 18 Hz (11% each). There was no correlation between f(used) and f(flow) (r(2)  = -0.12) or f(vol) (r(2) = 0.031). There was no correlation between f(res) and f(flow) (r(2)  = 0.19) or f(vol) (r(2) = 0.023). Multivariable analysis showed no independent variables were predictive of f(flow) or f(vol). Vest-tuning may be required to optimize clinical utility of HFCC. Multiple HFCC frequencies may need to be used to incorporate f(flow) and f(vol).

摘要

高频胸壁振荡(HFCC)是囊性纤维化(CF)的一种治疗方法。我们假设,通过脉冲振荡测量得到的共振频率(f(res))可以用于确定在儿科 CF 患者中,哪种 HFCC 背心设置可以产生最大的气流或容量。在 45 名受试者中,我们研究了:f(res)、受试者使用的 HFCC 背心频率(f(used))以及通过气流计测量产生最大体积(f(vol))和气流(f(flow))变化的 HFCC 背心频率。32 名受试者的中位 f(used)为 14 Hz(范围,6-30 Hz)。三种最常见的 f(used)的排序是 15 Hz(28%)和 12 Hz(21%);三个频率并列第三:10、11 和 14 Hz(各 5%)。43 名受试者的中位 f(res)为 20.30 Hz(范围,7.85-33.65 Hz)。19 名受试者接受了背心调谐以确定 f(vol)和 f(flow)。中位 f(vol)为 8 Hz(范围,6-30 Hz)。三种最常见的 f(vol)的排序是:8 Hz(42%)、6 Hz(32%)和 10 Hz(21%)。中位 f(flow)为 26 Hz(范围,8-30 Hz)。三种最常见的 f(flow)的排序是:30 Hz(26%)和 28 Hz(21%);三个频率并列第三:8、14 和 18 Hz(各 11%)。f(used)与 f(flow)(r(2) = -0.12)或 f(vol)(r(2) = 0.031)之间没有相关性。f(res)与 f(flow)(r(2) = 0.19)或 f(vol)(r(2) = 0.023)之间也没有相关性。多变量分析显示,没有独立变量可以预测 f(flow)或 f(vol)。可能需要背心调谐来优化 HFCC 的临床实用性。可能需要使用多种 HFCC 频率来结合 f(flow)和 f(vol)。

相似文献

1
Resonant frequency does not predict high-frequency chest compression settings that maximize airflow or volume.共振频率不能预测出能使气流或容量最大化的高频胸壁按压设置。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2011 Jun;46(6):604-9. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21414. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
2
Different frequencies should be prescribed for different high frequency chest compression machines.不同的高频胸部按压机器应设定不同的频率。
Biomed Instrum Technol. 2006 Jul-Aug;40(4):319-24. doi: 10.2345/i0899-8205-40-4-319.1.
3
Comparison of settings used for high-frequency chest-wall compression in cystic fibrosis.高频胸壁压迫在囊性纤维化中的应用环境比较。
Respir Care. 2010 Jun;55(6):695-701.
4
The long-term effect of high-frequency chest compression therapy on pulmonary complications of cystic fibrosis.高频胸部按压疗法对囊性纤维化肺部并发症的长期影响。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 1991;11(3):265-71. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950110314.
5
Comparison of active cycle of breathing and high-frequency oscillation jacket in children with cystic fibrosis.囊性纤维化患儿主动呼吸循环与高频振荡背心的比较。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2004 Jan;37(1):71-5. doi: 10.1002/ppul.10358.
6
The effects of high-frequency chest compression on end-tidal CO.高频胸壁按压对呼气末 CO₂的影响。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020 Mar;55(3):646-648. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24588. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
7
Physiological effects of vibration in subjects with cystic fibrosis.囊性纤维化患者振动的生理效应。
Eur Respir J. 2006 Jun;27(6):1204-9. doi: 10.1183/09031936.06.00083605. Epub 2006 Feb 2.
8
Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on oscillated volume during high frequency chest compression in children with cystic fibrosis.呼气末正压对囊性纤维化患儿高频胸部按压期间振荡容积的影响。
Can Respir J. 2003 Mar;10(2):94-8. doi: 10.1155/2003/792917.
9
Pilot study: understanding the effects of voicing intervention on HFCC therapy in people with cystic fibrosis.试点研究:了解发声干预对囊性纤维化患者高频胸壁振荡治疗效果的影响。
J Voice. 2009 Jul;23(4):484-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.11.004. Epub 2008 May 5.
10
The comparison of three high-frequency chest compression devices.三种高频胸部按压装置的比较。
Biomed Instrum Technol. 2008 Jan-Feb;42(1):68-75. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205(2008)42[68:TCOTHC]2.0.CO;2.