McCarren B, Alison J A
School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, PO Box 170, Lidcombe, NSW 1825, Australia.
Eur Respir J. 2006 Jun;27(6):1204-9. doi: 10.1183/09031936.06.00083605. Epub 2006 Feb 2.
The physiological mechanisms by which vibration and other physiotherapy interventions may clear secretions in subjects with cystic fibrosis are unknown. The main aim of this study was to compare the expiratory flow rates and frequencies of airflow oscillation of vibration to those of Acapella(R), Flutter(R), positive expiratory pressure and percussion. Respiratory flow rates were measured during interventions, the order of which was randomised. The oscillation of the airflow of the interventions was determined by frequency spectral analysis. In 18 young adult subjects with cystic fibrosis, the mean peak expiratory flow rate of vibration was greater than Flutter(R), percussion, Acapella(R) and positive expiratory pressure. The mean+/-sd of the oscillation of the airflow of vibration (8.4+/-0.4 Hz) was lower than Acapella(R) (13.5+/-1.7 Hz) and Flutter(R) (11.3+/-1.5 Hz) but similar to percussion (7.3+/-0.3 Hz). Theoretically, the higher peak expiratory flow rate of vibration compared to the other physiotherapy interventions may promote secretion clearance. In addition, the frequency of oscillation of vibration was within the range demonstrated to increase mucus transport. This study has provided some evidence for the physiological rationale for the use of vibration to aid secretion clearance.
振动及其他物理治疗干预措施可清除囊性纤维化患者分泌物的生理机制尚不清楚。本研究的主要目的是比较振动与阿法贝拉(Acapella)、弗勒特(Flutter)、呼气末正压及叩击的呼气流量率和气流振荡频率。在干预过程中测量呼吸流量率,干预顺序为随机安排。通过频谱分析确定干预措施的气流振荡情况。在18名患有囊性纤维化的年轻成年受试者中,振动的平均呼气峰值流速大于弗勒特、叩击、阿法贝拉及呼气末正压。振动气流振荡的平均值±标准差(8.4±0.4Hz)低于阿法贝拉(13.5±1.7Hz)和弗勒特(11.3±1.5Hz),但与叩击(7.3±0.3Hz)相似。从理论上讲,与其他物理治疗干预措施相比,振动的较高呼气峰值流速可能促进分泌物清除。此外,振动的振荡频率在已证明可增加黏液转运的范围内。本研究为使用振动辅助分泌物清除的生理原理提供了一些证据。