Suppr超能文献

自然感染的育肥场牛粪便一过性排出和有限的动物间传播艰难梭菌。

Transient fecal shedding and limited animal-to-animal transmission of Clostridium difficile by naturally infected finishing feedlot cattle.

机构信息

Food Animal Health Research Program, College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, USA.

出版信息

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 May;77(10):3391-7. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02736-10. Epub 2011 Mar 25.

Abstract

To longitudinally assess fecal shedding and animal-to-animal transmission of Clostridium difficile among finishing feedlot cattle as a risk for beef carcass contamination, we tested 186 ± 12 steers (mean ± standard deviation; 1,369 samples) in an experimental feedlot facility during the finishing period and at harvest. Clostridium difficile was isolated from 12.9% of steers on arrival (24/186; 0 to 33% among five suppliers). Shedding decreased to undetectable levels a week later (0%; P < 0.001), and remained low (< 3.6%) until immediately prior to shipment for harvest (1.2%). Antimicrobial use did not increase fecal shedding, despite treatment of 53% of animals for signs of respiratory disease. Animals shedding C. difficile on arrival, however, had 4.6 times higher odds of receiving antimicrobials for respiratory signs than nonshedders (95% confidence interval for the odds ratio, 1.4 to 14.8; P = 0.01). Neither the toxin genes nor toxin A or B was detected in most (39/42) isolates based on two complementary multiplex PCRs and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay testing, respectively. Two linezolid- and clindamycin-resistant PCR ribotype 078 (tcdA+/tcdB+/cdtB+/39-bp-type deletion in tcdC) isolates were identified from two steers (at arrival and week 20), but these ribotypes did not become endemic. The other toxigenic isolate (tcdA+/tcdB+/cdtB+/classic tcdC; PCR ribotype 078-like) was identified in the cecum of one steer at harvest. Spatio-temporal analysis indicated transient shedding with no evidence of animal-to-animal transmission. The association between C. difficile shedding upon arrival and the subsequent need for antimicrobials for respiratory disease might indicate common predisposing factors. The isolation of toxigenic C. difficile from bovine intestines at harvest highlights the potential for food contamination in meat processing plants.

摘要

为了纵向评估育肥场牛的艰难梭菌粪便排出和动物间传播情况,作为牛肉胴体污染的风险因素,我们在一个实验性育肥场设施中对 186 ± 12 头育肥牛(平均值 ± 标准差;1369 个样本)进行了测试,包括育肥期和收获期。艰难梭菌在抵达时从 12.9%的牛中分离出来(5 个供应商中 0 至 33%)。一周后,粪便脱落减少至无法检测到的水平(0%;P<0.001),并且在运往收获前的最后一周(1.2%)之前一直保持较低水平(<3.6%)。尽管对 53%的动物进行了呼吸道疾病症状的治疗,但抗菌药物的使用并没有增加粪便脱落。然而,在抵达时排出艰难梭菌的动物,其接受呼吸道症状抗菌药物治疗的几率是未排出者的 4.6 倍(比值比的 95%置信区间,1.4 至 14.8;P=0.01)。根据两种互补的多重 PCR 和酶联免疫吸附试验检测,大多数(39/42)分离株未检测到毒素基因或毒素 A 或 B。从两头牛(抵达时和第 20 周)中鉴定出两株利奈唑胺和克林霉素耐药的 PCR 核糖体型 078(tcdA+/tcdB+/cdtB+/tcdC 中的 39-bp 型缺失)分离株,但这些核糖体型未成为地方性的。另一个产毒分离株(tcdA+/tcdB+/cdtB+/经典 tcdC;PCR 核糖体型 078 样)在一头牛的盲肠中被鉴定出来。时空分析表明存在短暂的脱落,没有动物间传播的证据。在抵达时艰难梭菌脱落与随后需要使用抗生素治疗呼吸道疾病之间的关联可能表明存在共同的易患因素。在肉加工厂,从牛的肠道中分离出产毒艰难梭菌,突出了其对食品污染的潜在风险。

相似文献

1
5
Fecal shedding of Clostridioides difficile in calves in Sao Paulo state, Brazil.
Anaerobe. 2024 Aug;88:102861. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2024.102861. Epub 2024 May 9.
7
A multiplex, internally controlled real-time PCR assay for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile and identification of hypervirulent strain 027/ST-1.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Jun;31(6):1073-9. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1409-5. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
9
Dogs are carriers of Clostridioides difficile lineages associated with human community-acquired infections.
Anaerobe. 2021 Feb;67:102317. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2020.102317. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
10
Prevalence of gastrointestinal Clostridium difficile carriage in Australian sheep and lambs.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Sep;79(18):5689-92. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01888-13. Epub 2013 Jul 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Genotyping and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of and in Camel Minced Meat.
Pathogens. 2021 Dec 19;10(12):1640. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10121640.
4
Genomic Delineation of Zoonotic Origins of .
Front Public Health. 2019 Jun 20;7:164. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00164. eCollection 2019.
5
Clostridioides difficile ribotypes isolated from domestic environment and from patients in Bangladesh.
Anaerobe. 2019 Apr;56:88-90. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2019.02.010. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
7
Subboiling Moist Heat Favors the Selection of Enteric Pathogen Clostridium difficile PCR Ribotype 078 Spores in Food.
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2016;2016:1462405. doi: 10.1155/2016/1462405. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
8
Clostridium difficile in Food and Animals: A Comprehensive Review.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;932:65-92. doi: 10.1007/5584_2016_27.

本文引用的文献

1
Microbiological conditions of meats from large game animals and birds.
Meat Sci. 2007 Oct;77(2):149-60. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.03.007. Epub 2007 Mar 19.
2
Clostridium difficile in vegetables, Canada.
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2010 Nov;51(5):600-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2010.02933.x.
3
Enteric bacterial pathogens with zoonotic potential isolated from farm-raised deer.
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2010 Sep;7(9):1031-7. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2009.0486.
4
Clostridium difficile survives minimal temperature recommended for cooking ground meats.
Anaerobe. 2010 Oct;16(5):540-2. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2010.05.004. Epub 2010 May 19.
6
Varied prevalence of Clostridium difficile in an integrated swine operation.
Anaerobe. 2009 Dec;15(6):256-60. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2009.09.006. Epub 2009 Sep 22.
7
Clostridium difficile strains from community-associated infections.
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Sep;47(9):3004-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00964-09. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
10
Clostridium difficile in retail meat products, USA, 2007.
Emerg Infect Dis. 2009 May;15(5):819-21. doi: 10.3201/eid1505.081071.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验