Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Klinikum Hanau, Teaching Hospital of the Goethe University of Frankfurt/ Main, Germany.
Phytother Res. 2011 Sep;25(9):1263-74. doi: 10.1002/ptr.3464. Epub 2011 Mar 28.
Kava hepatotoxicity is a well described disease entity, yet there is uncertainty as to the culprit(s). In particular, there is so far no clear evidence for a causative role of kavalactones and non-kavalactone constituents, such as pipermethystine and flavokavain B, identified from kava. Therefore, novel enzymatic, analytical, toxicological, ethnobotanical and clinical studies are now required. Studies should focus on the identification of further potential hepatotoxic constituents, considering in particular possible adulterants and impurities with special reference to ochratoxin A and aflatoxins (AFs) producing Aspergillus varieties, which should be urgently assessed and published. At present, Aspergillus and other fungus species producing hepatotoxic mycotoxins have not yet been examined thoroughly as possible contaminants of some kava raw materials. Its occurence may be facilitated by high humidity, poor methods for drying procedures and insufficient storage facilities during the time after harvest. Various experimental studies are recommended using aqueous, acetonic and ethanolic kava extracts derived from different plant parts, such as peeled rhizomes and peeled roots including their peelings, and considering both noble and non-noble kava cultivars. In addition, ethnobotanical studies associated with local expertise and surveillance are required to achieve a good quality of kava as the raw material. In clinical trials of patients with anxiety disorders seeking herbal anxiolytic treatment with kava extracts, long-term safety and efficacy should be tested using traditional aqueous extracts obtained from peeled rhizomes and peeled roots of a noble kava cultivar, such as Borogu, to evaluate the risk: benefit ratio. Concomitantly, more research should be conducted on the bioavailability of kavalactones and non-kavalactones derived from aqueous kava extracts. To be on the side of caution and to ensure lack of liver injury, kava consuming inhabitants of the kava producing or importing South Pacific islands should undergo assessment of their liver function values and serum aflatoxin levels. The primary aim is to achieve a good quality of kava raw material, without the risk of adulterants and impurities including ochratoxin A and AFs, which represent the sum of aflatoxin B1, B2, G1 and G2. Although it is known that kava may naturally be contaminated with AFs, there is at present no evidence that kava hepatotoxicity might be due to aflatoxicosis. However, appropriate studies have yet to be done and should be extended to other mould hepatotoxins, with the aim of publishing the obtained results. It is hoped that with the proposed qualifying measures, the safety of individuals consuming kava will substantially be improved.
卡瓦肝毒性是一种已被充分描述的疾病实体,但对于致病物质(因素)仍存在不确定性。特别是,目前尚无确凿证据表明卡瓦内酯和非卡瓦内酯成分(如哌莫嗪和 flavokavain B)在卡瓦中具有致病作用。因此,现在需要进行新的酶学、分析、毒理学、民族植物学和临床研究。研究应侧重于进一步确定潜在的肝毒性成分,特别要考虑到可能的掺杂物和杂质,特别是赭曲霉毒素 A 和产黄曲霉毒素(AFs)的曲霉种类,应紧急评估和公布这些物质。目前,曲霉和其他产真菌毒素的真菌尚未作为某些卡瓦原料的潜在污染物进行彻底检查。在收获后,高湿度、干燥方法不当和储存设施不足可能会促进其发生。建议使用来自不同植物部位(如去皮块茎和去皮根,包括其外皮)的水性、丙酮和乙醇卡瓦提取物进行各种实验研究,并考虑使用优质和非优质卡瓦品种。此外,需要结合当地专业知识和监测进行民族植物学研究,以确保卡瓦作为原料的高质量。在寻求使用卡瓦提取物进行草药抗焦虑治疗的焦虑症患者的临床试验中,应使用传统的水性提取物(从优质卡瓦品种如 Borogu 的去皮块茎和去皮根中获得)来测试长期安全性和疗效,以评估风险:效益比。同时,应进一步研究水性卡瓦提取物中卡瓦内酯和非卡瓦内酯的生物利用度。为谨慎起见,并确保没有肝损伤,来自生产或进口南太平洋岛屿的卡瓦消费居民应评估其肝功能值和血清黄曲霉毒素水平。主要目标是获得高质量的卡瓦原料,没有包括赭曲霉毒素 A 和 AFs 在内的掺杂物和杂质的风险,这些成分代表黄曲霉毒素 B1、B2、G1 和 G2 的总和。虽然已知卡瓦可能自然受到 AFs 的污染,但目前没有证据表明卡瓦肝毒性可能是由于黄曲霉毒素中毒引起的。然而,还需要进行适当的研究,并应扩展到其他霉菌肝毒素,目的是公布获得的结果。希望通过拟议的限定措施,实质性地提高消费卡瓦的个人的安全性。