Department of Human Resource Studies, Cornell University, ILR School, 165 Ives Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Jul;96(4):872-80. doi: 10.1037/a0022991.
Despite an amassing organizational justice literature, few studies have directly addressed the temporal patterning of justice judgments and the effects that changes in these perceptions have on important work outcomes. Drawing from Gestalt characteristics theory (Ariely & Carmon, 2000, 2003), we examine the concept of justice trajectories (i.e., levels and trends of individual fairness perceptions over time) and offer empirical evidence to highlight the value of considering fairness within a dynamic context. Participants included 523 working adults who completed surveys about their work experiences on 4 occasions over the course of 1 year. Results indicate that justice trends explained additional variance in distal work outcomes (job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intentions) after controlling for end-state levels of justice, demonstrating the cumulative effects of justice over time. Findings also reveal that change in procedural justice perceptions affected distal work outcomes more strongly than any other justice dimension. Implications for theory and future investigations of justice as a dynamic construct are discussed.
尽管组织公正文献层出不穷,但很少有研究直接探讨公正判断的时间模式,以及这些感知变化对重要工作结果的影响。本研究借鉴格式塔特征理论(Ariely 和 Carmon,2000,2003),考察了公正轨迹的概念(即个体公平感知随时间的变化水平和趋势),并提供了实证证据来强调在动态环境中考虑公平的价值。参与者包括 523 名在职成年人,他们在 1 年内的 4 个时间点完成了关于工作经历的调查。结果表明,在控制了公正的最终状态水平后,公正趋势解释了远端工作结果(工作满意度、组织承诺和离职意向)的额外差异,表明公正随时间的累积效应。研究结果还表明,程序公正感知的变化对远端工作结果的影响比任何其他公正维度都更强烈。讨论了将公正作为动态构念进行理论和未来研究的意义。