Suppr超能文献

丹麦版手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍问卷在腕部骨折患者中的信度和效度

Reliability and validity of the Danish version of the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire in patients with fractured wrists.

作者信息

Schønnemann Jesper O, Larsen Kristian, Hansen Torben B, Søballe Kjeld

机构信息

Orthopedic Research Unit, Hospital Unit West, Holstebro, Denmark.

出版信息

J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2011 Feb;45(1):35-9. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2011.554708.

Abstract

The disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaire is a 30-item region-specific questionnaire that is used to measure the effect of treatment of the upper extremity. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of, and validate, the Danish version of the DASH score in patients with fractured wrists. Sixty patients were studied. We investigated internal consistency and test-retest reliability, convergent validity, content validity and responsiveness. Time to complete questionnaire was 11 minutes and two questionnaires were not usable. The internal consistency was sufficient (Cronbach's alpha 0.96 and intraclass correlation coefficient 0.89). The difference in the mean was 4.6 (CI: 0.48 to 8.72, p = 0.03). Convergent validity at first and last control was high for both pain, 0.46 and 0.40 respectively, and for physical mobility, 0.64 and 0.65 respectively, indicating that results confirmed other similar scores. We conclude that the Danish version of the 30-item DASH questionnaire is valid and practical for patients with fractured wrists.

摘要

上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)问卷是一份包含30个条目的特定部位问卷,用于评估上肢治疗效果。本研究旨在评估丹麦语版DASH评分在腕部骨折患者中的可靠性并进行验证。共研究了60例患者。我们调查了内部一致性、重测信度、收敛效度、内容效度和反应度。完成问卷的时间为11分钟,两份问卷不可用。内部一致性良好(Cronbach's α系数为0.96,组内相关系数为0.89)。平均值差异为4.6(置信区间:0.48至8.72,p = 0.03)。首次和末次对照时,疼痛的收敛效度较高,分别为0.46和0.40,身体活动能力的收敛效度也较高,分别为0.64和0.65,表明结果与其他类似评分相符。我们得出结论,丹麦语版30项DASH问卷对腕部骨折患者有效且实用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验