• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种植体周围近段骨水平的种植体存留率和影像学分析。

Implant survival and radiographic analysis of proximal bone levels surrounding a contemporary dental implant.

机构信息

College of Dental Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Implant Dent. 2011 Apr;20(2):146-56. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31820fbc31.

DOI:10.1097/ID.0b013e31820fbc31
PMID:21448024
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to evaluate the performance of a contemporary dental implant. Assessments were made regarding implant survival and radiographic bone changes from surgical placement to subsequent time points.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-five patients received 204 dental implants. One hundred and seventy-six implants were placed into healed ridges and 28 implants were inserted into fresh extraction sockets. Implant survival percentages and mean data pertaining to radiographic proximal bone loss for 1 randomly selected implant per patient are presented.

RESULTS

The survival rates for implants placed into healed ridges and fresh extraction sockets were 98.6% and 96.4%, respectively. The overall survival rate for all implants in the 75 patients was 99.0%. With respect to proximal bone levels, mesial and distal bone loss from surgical placement to 12 months was 0.96 mm mesially and 0.83 mm distally. From 24 to 36 months follow-up, the mesial and distal bone changes were 0.16 mm and 0.19 mm, respectively. Up to 36 months after implants were placed into fresh extraction sockets, the mean distance from the implant-abutment interface to the first bone to implant contact was 1.01 mm mesially and 1.10 mm distally.

CONCLUSION

With respect to the time frame of the study, assessed parameters were similar to other implant systems that are currently used.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估一种现代牙科植入物的性能。评估内容包括从手术植入到后续时间点的种植体存活率和影像学骨变化。

材料和方法

75 名患者共植入 204 颗种植体。其中 176 颗种植体植入愈合牙槽嵴,28 颗种植体植入新鲜拔牙窝。本文呈现了每位患者随机选择的 1 颗种植体的种植体存活率百分比和影像学近中骨丢失的平均值数据。

结果

植入愈合牙槽嵴和新鲜拔牙窝的种植体存活率分别为 98.6%和 96.4%。75 名患者的所有种植体总体存活率为 99.0%。就近中骨水平而言,从手术植入到 12 个月时近中侧和远中侧的骨丢失分别为 0.96mm 和 0.83mm。从 24 个月到 36 个月的随访中,近中侧和远中侧的骨变化分别为 0.16mm 和 0.19mm。在将种植体植入新鲜拔牙窝后的 36 个月内,种植体-基台界面到第一个种植体骨接触点的近中侧和远中侧平均距离分别为 1.01mm 和 1.10mm。

结论

就研究时间框架而言,评估参数与目前使用的其他种植系统相似。

相似文献

1
Implant survival and radiographic analysis of proximal bone levels surrounding a contemporary dental implant.种植体周围近段骨水平的种植体存留率和影像学分析。
Implant Dent. 2011 Apr;20(2):146-56. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31820fbc31.
2
Comparison of radiographic and clinical outcomes following immediate provisionalization of single-tooth dental implants placed in healed alveolar ridges and extraction sockets.在愈合的牙槽嵴和拔牙窝中植入单颗牙种植体后即刻临时修复的影像学和临床效果比较。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Nov-Dec;25(6):1222-32.
3
Influence of surgical and prosthetic techniques on marginal bone loss around titanium implants. Part I: immediate loading in fresh extraction sockets.手术及修复技术对钛种植体周围边缘骨吸收的影响。第一部分:新鲜拔牙窝内的即刻负重
J Prosthodont. 2014 Oct;23(7):521-7. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12153. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
4
Early functional loading of sand-blasted and acid-etched (SLA) Straumann implants following immediate placement in maxillary extraction sockets. Clinical and radiographic result.即刻植入上颌拔牙窝后对喷砂酸蚀(SLA)种植体进行早期功能加载。临床和影像学结果。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Aug;18(4):441-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01387.x. Epub 2007 May 21.
5
A randomized clinical trial to evaluate and compare implants placed in augmented versus non-augmented extraction sockets: 3-year results.一项评估和比较在增强型和非增强型拔牙窝中植入物的随机临床试验:3 年结果。
J Periodontol. 2012 Jul;83(7):836-46. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110205. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
6
A 1-year controlled clinical trial of immediate implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: stability measurements and crestal bone level changes.一项为期 1 年的即时种植体植入新鲜拔牙窝的对照临床试验:稳定性测量和牙槽嵴骨水平变化。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Aug;14(4):491-500. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00294.x. Epub 2010 Jul 17.
7
The efficacy of full-arch immediately restored implant-supported reconstructions in extraction and healed sites: a 36-month retrospective evaluation.全口即刻负重种植义齿修复在拔牙窝和愈合后位点的疗效:一项 36 个月的回顾性评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Mar-Apr;25(2):329-35.
8
Dental implants placed in extraction sites grafted with different bone substitutes: radiographic evaluation at 24 months.不同骨代用品移植的拔牙窝内植入的牙种植体:24 个月的放射学评估。
J Periodontol. 2009 Oct;80(10):1616-21. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090156.
9
Immediate occlusal loading of implants placed in fresh sockets after tooth extraction.拔牙后即刻在新鲜拔牙窝植入种植体的即刻咬合加载。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Nov-Dec;22(6):955-62.
10
Localized management of sinus floor technique for implant placement in fresh molar sockets.局部处理磨牙区牙槽骨技术在新鲜拔牙窝中种植体植入的应用
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Apr;15(2):243-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00348.x. Epub 2011 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the Effect of Topical Melatonin Application on Immediately Placed Dental Implants Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)评估局部应用褪黑素对即刻种植的牙种植体的影响。
Cureus. 2022 May 23;14(5):e25233. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25233. eCollection 2022 May.
2
Dental Implants Inserted in Fresh Extraction Sockets versus Healed Sites: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.新鲜拔牙窝植入种植体与愈合位点植入种植体的系统评价和Meta分析
Materials (Basel). 2021 Dec 20;14(24):7903. doi: 10.3390/ma14247903.
3
The seven-year cumulative survival rate of Osstem implants.
奥齿泰种植体的七年累积生存率。
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Apr;40(2):68-75. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2014.40.2.68. Epub 2014 Apr 28.