Nursing home De Riethorst Stromenland, Geertruidenberg, The Netherlands.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2011 Jul;12(6):410-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2010.07.018. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
There is extensive literature on interventions to prevent or reduce falls in elderly people. These findings, however, were based mainly on studies of community-living persons. The primary aim of the present study was to report the effectiveness and implementation aspects of interventions aimed at reducing falls in elderly residents in long-term care facilities: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and hand searching of reference lists of included RCTs.
RCTs that assessed fall incidents (falls, fallers, recurrent fallers, fall-related injuries) among elderly residents in long-term care facilities were included in this narrative review. Two independent reviewers abstracted data: general program characteristics (setting, population, intervention program) and outcomes, detailed program characteristics (assessment, intervention content, individually tailored, multidisciplinary), and implementation aspects (feasibility, implications for practice). The CONSORT Statement 2001 Checklist was used regarding the quality of reporting RCTs.
Twenty trials met the inclusion criteria. Seven trials, 4 multifactorial and 3 monofactorial, showed a significant reduction in the fall rate, the percentage of recurrent fallers, or both the fall rate and the percentage of persons sustaining femoral fractures. The positive effective programs were as follows: a comprehensive structured individual assessment with specific safety recommendations; a multidisciplinary program including general strategies tailored to the setting and strategies tailored specifically to residents; a multifaceted intervention including education, environmental adaptation, balance, resistance training, and hip protector; calcium plus vitamin D supplementation; vitamin D supplementation; a clinical medication review; and a multifactorial intervention (fall risk evaluation, specific and general interventions).
In general, because of the limited number of included trials, the evidence is inconclusive for multifaceted and single interventions in long-term care facilities. Most of the reviewed studies did not find a significant positive effect on fall incidents. However, our data support the conclusions of Gillespie et al. that multifactorial interventions in long-term care populations seem more likely to be beneficial. However, single interventions (eg, targeting vitamin D insufficiency) can be effective. Furthermore, a careful approach is needed as programs to prevent falls in these settings may be ineffective or even may have adverse effects. This may occur especially when a program is not feasible for the setting in which it is implemented.
关于预防或减少老年人跌倒的干预措施有大量文献。然而,这些发现主要基于对社区居住人群的研究。本研究的主要目的是报告旨在减少长期护理机构老年人跌倒的干预措施的有效性和实施方面:对随机对照试验(RCT)的系统评价。
MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL 和纳入 RCT 的参考文献列表的手工检索。
本叙述性综述纳入了评估长期护理机构中老年人跌倒事件(跌倒、跌倒者、复发性跌倒者、跌倒相关损伤)的 RCT。两名独立的审查员提取数据:一般计划特征(设置、人群、干预计划)和结果、详细的计划特征(评估、干预内容、个体化、多学科)以及实施方面(可行性、对实践的影响)。使用 CONSORT 声明 2001 清单评估 RCT 的报告质量。
20 项试验符合纳入标准。7 项试验,4 项多因素和 3 项单因素,显示跌倒率、复发性跌倒者的百分比或跌倒率和股骨骨折者的百分比均显著降低。有效的积极方案如下:全面的个体化结构化评估,并有具体的安全建议;包括针对环境和特定人群的一般策略以及针对特定人群的具体策略的多学科方案;包括教育、环境适应、平衡、阻力训练和臀部保护器的多方面干预;钙加维生素 D 补充剂;维生素 D 补充剂;临床药物审查;以及多因素干预(跌倒风险评估、具体和一般干预)。
一般来说,由于纳入试验的数量有限,长期护理机构中多因素和单一干预的证据尚无定论。大多数已审查的研究都没有发现对跌倒事件有显著的积极影响。然而,我们的数据支持 Gillespie 等人的结论,即长期护理人群中的多因素干预似乎更有可能有益。然而,单一干预(例如,针对维生素 D 不足)也可能有效。此外,需要采取谨慎的方法,因为在这些环境中预防跌倒的方案可能无效甚至可能产生不良影响。当一个方案对于实施该方案的环境不可行时,尤其可能会出现这种情况。