St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012 Aug;19(4):813-21. doi: 10.1177/1741826711403252. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
The large randomized controlled multicentre clinical trial, HF-ACTION, recently demonstrated that a programme of recommendation of regular exercise training at moderate intensity is safe, improves quality of life, and reduces the combined endpoint of all-cause death and hospitalization in patients with chronic heart failure. However, the size of beneficial effects was modest compared to results published in smaller single studies and meta-analyses.
Based on results of a pilot study, the objective of the present investigation is to test the hypothesis that a programme comprising interval training at high relative intensity would yield significantly larger effects in terms of left ventricular remodelling compared to moderate continuous exercise training.
In a three-armed randomized multicentre study of stable heart failure patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, the effects of a 12-week programme of high-intensity interval training (HIT; 85-90% of peak oxygen uptake, VO(2peak)) will be compared to actual practice in Europe, represented by either an isocaloric programme of moderate continuous training (MCT; 50-60% of VO(2peak)) and a recommendation of regular exercise (RE) of the individual patients' own preference based on clinical practice at the local centre. The primary endpoint is reverse remodelling, defined as change in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter assessed by echocardiography. Secondary endpoints include peak oxygen uptake (VO(2peak)), biomarkers, quality of life, and level of physical activity assessed by questionnaires. In addition, long-term maintenance of effects after the supervised training period will be determined. Assessments will be made at baseline, after the 12-week intervention programme, and at 1-year follow up. A total number of 200 patients on treatment per protocol, randomized to the three groups in a 1 : 1 : 1 manner, is estimated to detect clinically relevant differences in effect with HIT vs. MCT and RE (p < 0.05; statistical power 0.90) for the primary endpoint. Inclusion of patients started May 2009 and will run until total number has been reached.
最近一项大型、随机对照、多中心临床研究 HF-ACTION 表明,推荐慢性心力衰竭患者进行中等强度的规律运动训练方案不仅安全,还能提高生活质量,并降低全因死亡和住院的复合终点。然而,与小型单中心研究和荟萃分析发表的结果相比,该方案的有益效果幅度不大。
基于一项初步研究的结果,本研究旨在检验以下假设,即高相对强度的间歇训练方案在改善左心室重构方面的效果将显著大于中等强度持续运动训练。
在一项纳入稳定型心力衰竭患者(左心室射血分数≤35%)的三臂随机、多中心研究中,将比较 12 周高强度间歇训练(HIT;85-90%峰值摄氧量,VO 2peak)方案与欧洲实际的等热量中等强度持续训练(MCT;50-60%VO 2peak)方案的效果,以及根据当地中心临床实践建议患者选择的自身偏好的常规运动(RE)方案的效果。主要终点为超声心动图评估的左心室舒张末期直径的逆重构变化。次要终点包括峰值摄氧量(VO 2peak)、生物标志物、生活质量和通过问卷评估的体力活动水平。此外,还将确定监督训练期结束后效果的长期维持情况。评估将在基线、12 周干预后和 1 年随访时进行。预计每组 200 例按方案治疗的患者随机分为三组(1:1:1),可检测到 HIT 与 MCT 和 RE 相比的主要终点的临床相关效果差异(p<0.05;统计效能 0.90)。患者纳入于 2009 年 5 月开始,将持续到达到总人数。