Suppr超能文献

高强度间歇训练与渐进式高强度循环抗阻训练对心力衰竭患者内皮功能和心肺功能适应性的影响:一项初步的随机对照试验。

High-intensity interval training versus progressive high-intensity circuit resistance training on endothelial function and cardiorespiratory fitness in heart failure: A preliminary randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Health and Technologies in Health Sciences Program, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil.

BIOMED-REVAL (Rehabilitation Research Centre), Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Oct 1;16(10):e0257607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257607. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Exercise training is strongly recommended as a therapeutic approach to treat individuals with heart failure. High-intensity exercise training modalities still controversial in this population. The study aims to preliminary assess the consequences of high-intensity exercise training modalities, aerobic interval training (HIIT) and progressive high circuit-resistance training (CRT), on primarily endothelial function and cardiorespiratory fitness, and secondly on muscle strength and physical performance in heart failure patients.

METHODS

This preliminary multicentric randomized controlled trial comprised 23 heart failure patients, aged 56 ± 10 years old, mainly New York Heart Association classification I and II (%), hemodynamically stable, who compromise at least 36 exercise sessions of a randomly assigned intervention (HIIT, CRT or control group). Endothelial function, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, muscle strength and physical performance were completed at baseline and post-intervention.

RESULTS

Although no effects on endothelial function; both HIIT and CRT modalities were able to produce a positive effect on [Formula: see text] peak (HIIT = +2.1±6.5, CRT = +3.0±4.2 and control group = -0.1± 5.3 mL/kg/min, timegroup p-value<0,05) and METs (HIIT = +0.6±1.8, CRT = +0.9±1.2 and control group = 0±1.6, timegroup p-value<0,05). Only HIIT increased isokinetic torque peak (HIIT = +8.8±55.8, CRT = 0.0±60.7 and control group = 1.6±57.6 Nm) matched p-value<0,05. Regarding the physical performance, the CRT modality reduced chair stand test completion time (HIIT = -0.7±3.1, CRT = -3.3±3.2 and control group = -0.3±2.5 s, matched p-value<0,05 and HIIT improved global physical performance(time*group p<0,05).

CONCLUSION

This preliminary study trends to indicate for the first time that high-intensity interval training promotes a jointly superior effect compared to progressive high intensity circuit-resistance training by improving cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular strength, and physical performance. Further research with larger cohort is necessary.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ReBEC RBR-668c8v.

摘要

简介

运动训练作为一种治疗心力衰竭患者的方法被强烈推荐。高强度运动训练模式在该人群中仍存在争议。本研究旨在初步评估高强度运动训练模式(间歇高强度训练 HIIT 和渐进式高阻力训练 CRT)对主要内皮功能和心肺功能适应性的影响,其次对肌肉力量和心力衰竭患者的身体表现的影响。

方法

本初步多中心随机对照试验纳入 23 名年龄在 56±10 岁的心力衰竭患者,主要为纽约心脏协会分类 I 和 II(%),血流动力学稳定,至少完成 36 次随机分配干预(HIIT、CRT 或对照组)的运动训练。在基线和干预后完成内皮功能、心肺运动测试、肌肉力量和身体表现的评估。

结果

尽管 HIIT 和 CRT 两种模式都没有对内皮功能产生影响;但它们都能对[Formula: see text]峰值产生积极影响(HIIT = +2.1±6.5,CRT = +3.0±4.2,对照组 = -0.1±5.3 mL/kg/min,时间组 p 值<0,05)和 METs(HIIT = +0.6±1.8,CRT = +0.9±1.2,对照组 = 0±1.6,时间组 p 值<0,05)。只有 HIIT 增加了等速扭矩峰值(HIIT = +8.8±55.8,CRT = 0.0±60.7,对照组 = 1.6±57.6 Nm),匹配 p 值<0,05。关于身体表现,CRT 模式减少了坐立测试完成时间(HIIT = -0.7±3.1,CRT = -3.3±3.2,对照组 = -0.3±2.5 s,匹配 p 值<0,05,HIIT 提高了整体身体表现(时间*组 p<0,05)。

结论

这项初步研究首次趋势表明,高强度间歇训练通过提高心肺功能适应性、肌肉力量和身体表现,与渐进式高强度阻力训练相比具有更优越的效果。需要进一步的更大队列研究。

临床试验注册号

ReBEC RBR-668c8v。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验