Institute for Healthcare Improvement, 20 University Road, 7th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Apr;20 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i24-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.046557.
In Plato's Theaetetus, knowledge is defined as the intersection of truth and belief, where knowledge cannot be claimed if something is true but not believed or believed but not true. Using an example from neonatal intensive care, this paper adapts Plato's definition of the concept 'knowledge' and applies it to the field of quality improvement in order to explore and understand where current tensions may lie for both practitioners and decision makers. To increase the uptake of effective interventions, not only does there need to be scientific evidence, there also needs to be an understanding of how people's beliefs are changed in order to increase adoption more rapidly. Understanding how best to maximise the overlap between actual and best practice is where quality improvement needs to employ educational and social sciences' methodologies and techniques.
在柏拉图的《泰阿泰德篇》中,知识被定义为真理和信念的交集,即如果某件事情是真实的但不被相信,或者被相信但不是真实的,就不能声称拥有知识。本文从新生儿重症监护室的一个例子出发,改编了柏拉图对“知识”概念的定义,并将其应用于质量改进领域,以探索和理解当前实践者和决策者可能面临的紧张局势。为了提高有效干预措施的采用率,不仅需要有科学证据,还需要了解如何改变人们的信念,以更快地提高采用率。理解如何最大限度地扩大实际最佳实践之间的重叠,是质量改进需要运用教育和社会科学的方法和技术的地方。